dedalus_1947: (Default)

I had a friend was a big baseball player

Back in high school,

He could throw that speedball by you,

Make you look like a fool, boy.

Saw him the other night, at this roadside bar;

I was walking in, he was walking out.

We went back inside, sat down, and had a few drinks;

But all he kept talking about was

Glory days – well they’ll pass you by,

Glory days – in the wink of a young girl’s eye,

Glory days, glory days, glory days.

(Glory Days, Bruce Springsteen, 1982)


“Hello?” I asked in an overly loud voice, in the direction of the speaker phone attached to the window shade of my car. “Hello?” I repeated. “Hi Tony, this is Ed” said the disembodied voice of my brother from the speaker.

“Hi Ed, what’s up?” I said.

“I’m calling to make sure you’re still going to the game today”.

“Of course” I replied, “I’m on my way now. I should be at Art’s house by 5 o’clock. Where are you?”

“I’m just leaving Monrovia, but I should be there by 5:00. I’ll call back when I get off the 605 Freeway in Artesia”.

“Great, I’ll talk to you later.” I pushed the face plate of the speaker to disconnect the call. About 10 minutes later, the speaker again emitted a high pitched “beeeeep”, signaling that another call was coming through. This was immediately followed by a robotic voice, in a faintly British accent saying “call from: four-one-nine-two-five-five nine”. I pushed the face plate again and said, “Hi Prisa!”

“Hi Dad, are you still going to the game?”

“Sure am, I’m on Interstate 5, heading for the 710 freeway. What about you?”

“I’m leaving my apartment now” Prisa replied, “but I’ll be taking surface streets to Art’s house. Artesia Blvd is a straight shot to his house. I’m hoping to be there around 5 o’clock”.

“Great, I talked with Ed, and it looks like we’re all synchronized to arrive at Art’s at about the same time”.

“Ok, then; I’ll call you if you’re not already there. Bye”

After I said goodbye, I was struck by the suspicion that my brother and daughter were in a conspiracy to make sure that I followed through on my intention to come to the soccer game today. I had cancelled on two previous occasions, and I was the last of my brothers and sisters to watch a Chivas USA soccer game, at the Home Depot Center in Carson. Since purchasing season tickets, my brother Arthur had begged me to be his guest. Even my daughter Prisa and her fiancé Joe had gone to a game. I had declined every one of Art’s entreaties. All my reasons were logical – the distance was too great, the starting time too late, or a prior engagement conflicted with the date; but they were all excuses. I simply didn’t want to go, and I couldn’t explain why – even to myself.

 

Art had been a devoted soccer fan since high school. Before the advent of local professional teams, he was attending matches of touring Mexican and European teams that visited Los Angeles from time to time. When Major League Soccer (MLS) attracted two franchises (first the Los Angeles Galaxy in 1996 and Chivas USA in 2004), he was the first person in line to buy Chivas season tickets for their new facility in Carson. Art told me they were the best seats in the house, but I was not inclined to believe him until evidence started trickling down from family members.

“They are REALLY good seats!” my sisters, Stella and Gracie, exclaimed in amazement. “Honestly, you have to go just to see his seats!”

My curiosity to visit the Home Depot Stadium and see these wondrous seats for myself finally overcame my mysterious case of ambivalence. When Art once again sent an email inviting me to a Galaxy - Chivas game, I said “Yes”.
 

 

I have a peculiar relationship with the game of soccer; a relationship that sometimes confuses people who know me - especially people who knew me in high school. I find the sport slow and boring, even at the professional level. I rarely go to games or watch them on television. The only exception is the World Cup playoffs. This is the month-long tournament which occurs every four years, when the finest soccer athletes of each country compete on national teams to determine the best team on the planet. It is the only authentic “World Series”. I saw my first World Cup while I was attending summer school classes at the National University of Mexico in Mexico City in 1966. I loved being part of a nationwide drama; watching one’s team compete, and then supporting a foreign favorite when your team is eliminated. In 1966, the Cup was decided in an epic match between England and Germany, with the British winning on a controversial overtime goal. Every four years, I get caught up in the excitement of the worldwide tournament and watch as many games as I can. At other times, I’m disinterested. My indifference has always confused Art. We were on the same soccer team in high school, and had played together for two years.

“Tony” he would exclaim, in surprise. “How can you not love the game? You were a two year letterman on the team that won the CIF Championship!” It was puzzling to him, and to me.
 

 

Albert Nocella was the first person to mention the idea.

“Tony” he began one day, as we took our seats in Father Salvador’s Religion class, sitting across the aisle from each other. “Wouldn’t you like to be a letterman, wearing one of those sweaters?” He nodded towards a tight group of 4 students, wearing thigh-length, thickly woven, white cotton sweaters with the bold school letter “B” emblazoned above the left pocket. They were crowded around Father Salvador’s desk, laughing and joking.

“Sure” I replied enviously, still believing in the mythology that lettermen always got the girls and popularity in high school, “but there’s no way. I dropped football after spring training, I’m not good enough at basketball or baseball, and I hate running – so cross country and track are out. There is no varsity sport I can letter in”. The bitterness of those last 9 words blackened my mood. In my sophomore year, I had forsaken the dream of playing a varsity sport and earning a varsity letter. I had fallen back on my Plan B – to win accolades and fame through scholarship. That year I made a concerted effort to earn the highest grades and be noticed by teachers and students for intelligence. For the first time, I received A’s in History, English, Spanish, and Religion, and B’s in P.E. and Math, and was invited to join the California Scholastic Federation (CSF). This was the Letterman’s Club of academics, where only the smartest students in the school were admitted. There I discovered that they were not all nerds and geeks. In fact many of these honor roll students played on “the thinking man’s sports” of cross-country and track. These were solitary, non-contact sports that allowed opportunities for reflection, thought, and individual achievement. I did not miss the irony of having gained entry into an elite scholastic organization, only to be surrounded by CSF students wearing letterman sweaters.

“No problem” continued Albert in a whisper, so Father Salvador wouldn’t notice, “I think I’ve found a sport we can letter in”.

“You’re cracked” I mutter in ventriloquist style, trying not to move my lips, as Father was telling us to open our books. “What sport can WE letter in?”

“Soccer” he hissed at me. “We try out for Father Amador’s soccer team”.

“Soccer!” I said, in a surprised loud voice. “I can’t play soccer!”

“Mr. Delgado”, interrupted Father Salvador, looking at me from over his lectern, “am I intruding on your discussion? Would you like me to wait until you’re finished?” he added sarcastically.

“Sorry, father” I replied, “I was asking Albert about his mother’s health. She has been ill, you know”.

“I did not know, but let’s not bother Mr. Nocella during a stressful time. Let me provide the solace and you pay attention”.

“Yes, father. Sorry, father”, I said opening my religion book and shielding my face.

“I’ll talk to you at lunch” came Albert’s whisper on my left.
 

 

Father Amador had been our foreign language teacher the year before. He was the shortest and most frail looking young priest in the Piarist Order at St. Bernard High School. It was his first year of teaching and he didn’t have a clue how to handle American high school boys. All of the priests of this Iberian religious order were either from Spain, or the province of Catalonia (Catalonia, they always explained, might be IN Spain, but it was not really part of it). St. Bernard was the first beachhead of their teaching mission in the United States – and their future looked tenuous. Of the nine priests who occupied the residential house on the school campus, only two or three of the most eccentric were successful at relating with American teenagers. The rest lived in an imaginary religious-cultural bubble, dependent on the fickle cooperation of their adolescent male students. Father Amador was the weakest teacher in the house. He struggled valiantly at gaining our respect, but rarely succeeded. Albert and I had been in his sophomore Spanish class. Spanish was my “easy A”; it was my first language and I spoke it fluently, but, I had never received formal instruction in reading and writing until then. My goal in class was to avoid antagonizing my teacher so he wouldn’t raise my performance criteria too much higher than my non-fluent companions. Albert, despite 4 years of Spanish by the time he graduated, never learned more than 4 or 5 stock phrases (“Hola, Paco, que tal”, and “Mis albondigas estan discompuestas” were his favorites). Albert’s expertise lay in his ability to seduce teachers into getting off the subject and talking about themselves, and their interests. Amador and Nocella were an ideal match; Father didn’t want to teach, and Albert didn’t want to learn. The rest of the class just sat back to watch and listen (occasionally volunteering a question or two if Albert hesitated or faltered). It was during one of these off-topic discussions that we discovered that Father Amador had been a soccer star in his “preparatoria” (high school) and seminary in Spain. He loved talking about a sport no one knew anything about, and his early struggles at coaching the first-year team at Bernard’s. Neither the team nor the sport registered a blip on the school’s athletic radar screen, until the yearbook came out in June. Soccer was given four pages of pictures (more than cross-country, swimming, and track), and two sophomores on the team had won varsity letters, John Mahler and Danny Burke.
 

 

I found Albert at the far end of the breezeway during lunch. He was already in an animated conversation with two other students in our homeroom, Rick Villasenor and Bill Dennis.

“You’re crazy, Nocella” I repeated in Catholic school fashion, addressing him by his last name only. “We’re juniors. It’s too late for us to make a varsity team in a sport we never played”.

“Hear him out, Delgado” interjected Villasenor. “He makes sense”.

“Yah” added Dennis, an intense, dirty-blonde haired student, who only spoke in short, choppy, sentences.

I knew both of these boys as fellow classmates and failed varsity athletes. We had played softball on opposing parish teams in grammar school, and we still enjoyed playing all the seasonal sports during P.E. and lunch. However, we had given up on football for various reasons (see Forever, Not for Better), and were not talented enough to play beyond the JV level in the other serious sport programs. Our dreams of playing a varsity sport were coming to an end in our junior year.

“Okay” I said, “I’m listening”.

“Tony, I’m telling you, it’s a wide open sport. I talked to Burke and Mahler, and the team is desperate for players. They said nobody knows how to play the game – everybody is a beginner. There is only ONE team, a varsity team, and everybody who tries out is on it. Do you know what that means?”

“We could earn a letter before the end of the year” I answered in a hushed voice, not believing the possibility. All four of us looked at each other, not needing further elaboration. We loved sports and loved to play them, but found ourselves shut out of an exclusive club called “Varsity”.

“I think we can learn how to play this game” finished Albert. “Come on, Tony” he urged. “What can it take? You can kick a stupid ball around, can’t you?”

“Let’s talk to Mahler” I countered, seeking more time to consider. Albert was convincing - temptingly so; but Albert wasn’t a jock. He had never played an organized sport outside of Little League baseball, least of all football. Villasenor and Dennis had played freshman or JV football; they knew the rigors of training and the difficulties of perfecting skills and techniques. The issue was whether soccer offered a real avenue to PLAY and therefore LETTER on a varsity team. We would learn this from John Mahler. He was a unique individual, a varsity football and soccer player with credibility with all the jocks and non-jocks on campus because of his sportsmanship, honesty, and lack of pretense. Everybody liked and trusted Mahler. We found him among a group of football lettermen, walking out of the food shack near the center walkway.

“Hi Mahler” said Albert, walking up to him. “Can we talk to you about the soccer team?”

“Sure” Mahler said, nodding to his friends to go on without him. “What do you need?”

“Albert is trying to talk us into going out for soccer” I said quickly. “None of us know anything about the game. I want to know if we have a real chance to make the team and play, so we can earn letters.”

“If that’s a question, the answer is yes” Mahler said simply. “We need players, lots of them. Every position is open. Last year’s team was filled with senior football players who didn’t know what they were doing. They played the game like rugby, and they drove Father Amador nuts. Me and Burke were the only guys who learned how to play the game. This year, we have a new coach, but only two returning letterman. If you show up and practice, you can play. If you play, you can letter. We want guys who’ll put in the time and effort”.

“Okay” I said, looking at the other boys to see if they had questions. “When are tryouts?”

“They start on Wednesday after school at Westchester Park, on Manchester Blvd. The football field will be available when football season ends. Until then we practice at the park”.

“Thanks, Mahler” added Villasenor, “See ya”.

That was how I decided to play soccer in the fall of 1964.
 

 

My first year of soccer was an exploratory venture into maturity. I took full responsibility for the logistical and procedural requirements of joining, practicing, and playing a new sport. My Mom and Dad provided the funds, resources, and support, but I made all the arrangements (although Albert was always eager to give me advice, and keep me company). The first issue was transportation. I was one of 2 or 3 students who had driver’s licenses in their junior year of high school, and I inherited the task of driving my twin siblings, Art and Stella to school. I realized immediately that Stella would have no choice but to wait for us after school, if BOTH Arthur and I were playing soccer. So, despite my reluctance over playing on the same team as my brother, I talked him into joining. Actually, he jumped at the chance. I had never bothered to explore Art’s yearning to play a high school sport and earn a varsity letter. He was a very good Little League baseball player, but didn’t have the weight to play football. I always assumed he had given up on sports to concentrate on art and his grades. I discovered that soccer offered him the same opportunity it offered me. Once my transportation problems were resolved, Albert mooched a regular ride home from practice. It was only then that I entertained the sneaking suspicion that his efforts at convincing me to try out had been motivated by his need for a ride. Once it was clear that all three of us were on the team, I drove to an athletic shoe store on Pico Boulevard, near Vermont. It was the first time I had driven into an unknown part of the city, with a car full of student players, to buy our own equipment. It was liberating.

 

Three years of playing Pop Warner football, and one failed season of spring training (see Forever, Not for Better), had given me an analytical perspective on organized athletics. I could examine the sport, and my play, in a surprisingly objective fashion. Like any sport, the basic skills of soccer were not difficult to learn. The rules were new and unusual, but the physical mechanics of kicking, stopping, passing, and controlling the ball were simple. It is only the fluid and thoughtless execution of these techniques that is hard. Physical conditioning and practice are the essentials of any sport, and the scrimmages and games are always the fun part – the reward. We had a few natural players on the team, children of immigrants who learned the game as infants. These native players, along with those gifted individuals who mastered the essential skills the quickest, made up the starting team: an offense composed of a five-man front line (two wingers at the ends, two forwards, and one center striker); and a three-tiered defense, composed of 3 half backs, 2 fullbacks, and a goalie. Mr. Cooper, a retired British, semi-pro soccer player, was our coach. He was excitable and emotional in his language, mannerisms, and moods, but he was an encouraging and understanding man who realized that he was dealing with a squad of novice adolescents. Once he had identified the obviously superior players for most of the positions on the first team, I detected that he was looking for players with “the proper attitude”- players who demonstrated more aggressiveness than technical mastery. When I came to the conclusion that I was average in my mechanics, but on par with everyone else, my first-born-son compulsion to overachieve kicked in. To win a starting spot at the only halfback position available, I decided to distinguish myself from the competition. I concentrated on performing two finesse skills that few players had mastered: headers (striking the ball with the top of one’s forehead to redirect or shoot the ball at the goal) and throw-in’s (throwing the ball back into play, in a rigid, straight-armed fashion, directly over your head, without bending the elbows). Both techniques were awkward, and few players could do them correctly. The week before our first game, with the starting lineup still in question, I put forth a burst of supercharged energy and aggression, and caught the coach’s attention with my willingness to head the ball at every opportunity, and throw it in as far as I could. The ball was rocketing off the top of my head and forehead, and I could reach Burke at his center position in front of the goal with a throw-in from the sidelines. I made the first team and started the next three games.
 

 

Mastering basic mechanics and winning a starting position did not mean I knew what I was doing, or what was going on around me. I did not. I was going through the motions without visualizing a strategy or outcome. All my thoughts and actions were directed at avoiding mistakes, and that never made for fluid and effortless play. With each game I became more uncomfortable and less certain of my position and play. I was envious of Albert, my brother Art, and the other rookies sitting on the bench. They were slowly improving their games at a natural pace, watching and studying the matches being played. I concluded that I overachieved myself into an untenable situation and needed to sit down and reassess it. I needed, therefore, to find a way for the coach to reach the same conclusion without actually telling him. Teenage-thinking was impossible to explain to an adult, especially a coach: “Oh, Mr. Cooper, even though you think I’m good enough to start, I disagree. So I’d like to bench myself for a spell, until I feel more confident about my level of play”. That scenario would not work. On the morning of the game against Pater Noster High School, I told my mother I felt ill and unable to attend the game. It fell on my brother to inform the coach that I wasn’t able to play. I reasoned that if my “aggressive attitude” had gained his attention, demonstrating a clear lack of it would achieve my desired goal. A senior halfback by the name of Bjelejac (bee-gel-jack) was promoted to my position and I never started another game that season. I welcomed the demotion. I had been performing way over my head, with no feel or understanding of the game. Sitting on the bench and evaluating the actions of other players, without any performance anxiety, was a huge relief. Practices became more enjoyable, and competing against the first team in scrimmages was a delight. I could try any maneuver I saw or learned – sliding tackles, scissor kicks, over-the-head and backward kicks, and shots on goal from the top of the penalty box. Albert and I were finally having fun with this new sport. Our only worry was the varsity letter. I reasoned that I had amassed enough playing time during the first three games to acquire one, but Nocella was worried. He needed to insure his letter by playing to his off-field strength - humorous interactions with teachers in class. He began steadily lobbying the Team Faculty Moderator (or Piarist Assistant Coach), before school, during class, and after school in practice. Father Salvador, our religion teacher, had taken the position after Father Amador left (disappeared, was more like it), and Albert engaged him relentlessly until he surrendered on the issue. There was no way Albert ever had more than 5 or 10 minutes of game time the entire season, but he provided an indispensible ingredient for a successful program: he radiated loyalty and commitment to the team, with a flair for fun and humor at practice and on the bench. The day after we received our letters for varsity soccer, Albert submitted his application to the Letterman’s Club and made arrangements for me to drive him, Villasenor, and Dennis to a tailor shop in Inglewood to order our sweaters. On the drive back, a remarkable transformation occurred – this group of selfish, self-serving, and mercenary juniors looked at ourselves and realized that we had become a TEAM in the course of the year.
 

 

I don’t recall who first thought of it, or how it grew in the re-telling, but of the original eleven juniors who went out for the team in November of 1964, seven of us developed the absurd notion that we could win the League and CIF Championship in our senior year. The ridiculousness of that idea astounds me even today. Arthur once admitted during HIS senior year in soccer that the new coaches who replaced Mr. Cooper and Father Salvador described the 1966 team as “a bunch of kickers who managed to score a goal once in awhile”. I was offended at the time, but eventually realized that they were right. We had no business dreaming of championships, we barely knew how to play the game; but the more we talked after our first season, the more we came to believe that we could do it, and the more we played.
 

 

In those days, there were very few club teams at the high school level, especially in soccer. Sports were divided into seasons, and seasons came to an end. Mahler and Burke, as the longest tenured members of the team, took the lead of translating our impossible dream into practice. A core group of juniors (and my brother, who was a sophomore) made a commitment to play (practice) every Saturday or Sunday, until the new season began in November of 1965. This habit would keep us in shape and allow us to perfect our mechanics. The coaches could not ask this of us, but we could demand it of ourselves. The key to this plan was the “annoying pestering” from key individuals – Burke, the co-captain and trainer, Villasenor, the catalyst and motivator, and Nocella, the cheerleader and “fixer” (if there was a problem, Albert could fix it). I’m sure many difficulties and inconveniences arose in the course of the spring and summer, but I only remember it as fun. It was as if the crew of a ship had hijacked the vessel and taken it for an adventure cruise; suddenly, we were in charge of our own team. We communicated at school and by phone. We had driver’s licenses, automobiles, and all the necessary equipment. All we needed was a grassy field to play on, and people to match up against. If we were short the minimum number of players, we recruited friends, family, and strangers. We signed up new team members over the summer, and discovered a freshman from Ireland. When we got together on Saturday or Sunday, we played 11 on 11, 8 on 8, or 4 on 4; whenever we had less than 6 players, we would shoot on goal (with each of us alternating at goalie). Necessity forced us to play every position, so our mechanics became more natural and spontaneous. More important than honing technique, every weekend gave us the time to talk and figure out this sport that we had started playing only 4 months earlier. There were no adults telling us what to do, or what we should work on; we were soon-to-be seniors diagnosing our own progress, and prescribing our own solutions. Swigging Cokes or Pepsi after a practice, we would kick back on the grass and compare ourselves to Salesian High School, the best team in the league. They were the team to beat. However, even though many considered them “the Brazilians” of our league, we found some weaknesses. They were short in stature, lacked weight and strength, and had a tendency to show off their finesse dribbling and over-passing. We were oafish and clumsy in comparison, but, we also had some advantage. We had the best goalie in the league (John Mahler); big and strong defensemen who were very comfortable blocking and tackling in the American style of football; and a maniac center striker (Dan Burke) who would never quit until he scored (or assisted in the goal). Our strategy, as it evolved over the summer, was simple, to force every team to play our American style of soccer-football; we were a defense-oriented team, with a counter-punching, forward pass offense.
 

 

When the coaches returned in November of 1965, they discovered a predominately senior team of players, who were well conditioned, confident playing their positions, and focused on one mission – to take league and win the CIF Championship. Our first game was against Salesian, so we would find out soon enough if there was merit to our summer long dreams. I had also won back my starting position at right halfback, playing next to Villasenor. Contrary to my first year, I knew I could play the position and believed I was the best available athlete. I never kidded myself as to the level of my ability. I played soccer the way I played football, methodically, skillfully, and dependably. I had been blooded and beaten in battles, and I knew my own measure against opponents. If I could put a body on my man, deny him the ball, and kick, head, and pass well enough to get the ball to my teammates, I could play this game.
 

 

We played Salesian on a grey and overcast Saturday morning on the soccer fields of Loyola University (it would not be called Loyola-Marymount until 1975). We had visualized this game all summer and fall. With the opening whistle to start the match, we played a tight man-to-man defense, marking our opponents, staying with them at all times, and denying them the ball. Our forward line would double up on these men as often as possible to steal the ball or force it loose. Our counter-attacks were a series of swift, outlet passes to our wingers, who would fast-break down the sidelines and then center the ball towards the middle. In the meantime, our forwards would streak down the center of the field, filling the lanes, and receive the centering pass and score. We knocked the Salesian players off the ball and off their game from the start, and their frustration and anger grew as the game progressed. They yelled at, and criticized each other, and complained of their lack of hustle. We just played our game and supported each other. We broke a 1 to 1 tie in the second half, and played intense defense for the remainder of the game. We never tired, and our resolve never waivered. When the ref blew his whistle to end the game I blinked in disbelief. We had done it; we had beaten the best in the league. We had imagined it, talked about it, and rehearsed it all summer. We were on our way to a magical season that ended on February 19, 1966, against San Gabriel Mission High School, for the CIF Championship. We played our same style of soccer and won 2 to 1.
 

 

Prisa, Eddie, and I arrived within 2 minutes of each other at my brother’s home. Arthur and five yapping mini-dogs greeted us at the door, and he then proceeded to guide us through the wonders of his favorite professional soccer team, Chivas USA. He loaded us with a cornucopia of booster paraphernalia and promotional gear from his season-ticket stash, and he gave a running commentary on the team, its strengths, weaknesses, and prospects for the year. He lived only a short freeway distance from the home stadium at the Home Depot Center, and we left quickly so he could show us around. The stadium still maintained its newly constructed look. He and his wife, Elia, were such well known boosters that we were ushered through the VIP entrance, and allowed access to the box-seat hospitality pavilion. His seats were everything he had promised, and I had heard about. They were slightly above ground level, and adjacent to the stadium tunnel where all the players, celebrities, and entertainers entered and exited the field. Arthur could lean over, shake hands, and chat with all the players, coaches, and trainers. He appeared to be on a first name basis with all of them.

“You really kept up your interest in the game, didn’t you?” I asked, rhetorically, looking around the stadium in wonderment.

“Yeah, I guess I did” he replied. “I’ve always liked the game, even though I didn’t play much after high school. The Galaxy has more recognized stars like Beckman and Landon Donovan, but Chivas has stronger Mexican and South American support. The Latino fans make the games more enjoyable to watch – they really get into it. What about you; why don’t you watch or go to games?”

“I’m not sure” I said “After high school I never played again. I enjoy watching every sport other than soccer. I suppose, soccer was just a means to an end. It let me play a varsity sport, be a letterman, and win a championship in high school – but I never loved the game”.

“How is that possible?” pressed Arthur. “Bernard’s never had another year like your senior year. The team was never the same after you guys graduated”.

“You know, Art” I realized. “I don’t remember ‘the good old days’ of high school with a lot of fondness, but I did enjoy playing on that team. We haven’t been together since our 20th Reunion in 1986, and Frank Cuozzo and Terry Harwood never came back from Vietnam. Being together, dreaming together, and playing together, made that senior year special. Everything coalesced for us that year”.

“So soccer was fun” Art summarized.

“No” I corrected, “The team was fun; but it only lasted a season”.
 

 

We watched an exciting game that Chivas led 2-1 going into the last 2 minutes of play. It was during the added-on time, that Galaxy scored a desperation goal. The game ended in a tie.
 

dedalus_1947: (Default)

“Coaching is a profession of love.

You can’t coach people unless you love them”.

(Eddie Robinson, former Grambling State College coach)

 

“Either love your players

or get out of coaching”.

(Bobby Dodd, former Georgia Tech coach)

 

“Bye Dad”, Prisa said, giving me a quick peck on the cheek.

Clutching a sports bag to her chest, the pony-tailed girl in a grey and black jersey squeezed between the narrow entrance doors and sprinted off in the direction of eight girls at the far end of the court. The similarly dressed girls were stretching on the floor in the corner, or milling around the edge of the bleachers. I barely noticed the hasty goodbye and kiss from my daughter, as I entered the large, luminous, plastic bubble, that served as a gymnasium. Instead of the solid, reassuring echoes of a basketball court with players and spectators, I was distracted by the clattering ricochets of shouts and clapping that rebounded off the synthetic walls and roof. These noises did not synchronize with the game being played on the paneled floor. There was none of the steady drumming of basketballs, or the squeaking of sneakers against polished floors, as players passed, skipped, and dribbled. I heard none of these familiar harmonies as I entered the building. The noises I heard were harsh - and the poor acoustics in the ersatz gym made them deafening. The fact that we were in this cavernous monstrosity in the first place, was testament to the truism that boys and girls will play basketball anywhere in which two opposing hoops are hoisted 10 feet off the ground, and separated by a distance of 30 yards.
 

 

We were at a club basketball tournament at Alemany High School, on the grounds of what was once Our Lady Queen of Angels Junior Seminary, next to the San Fernando Mission. The original high school on Rinaldi Blvd had been damaged beyond repair in the Northridge Earthquake of 1994. The temporary move to the seminary across the street became permanent the following year, when it became obvious that the tiny number of priestly candidates did not warrant the exclusive use of such a large facility. There ensued a five year modernization and building program which would end with the completion of a new gym. In the interim, all high school games which required a court were played in the gyms of surrounding schools. For three years, I had watched the Louisville High School basketball team play Alemany in the gym belonging to L.A. Baptist High School. However, as I discovered on this day, the Alemany teams practiced at home, in this temporary structure made of plastic, vinyl, and acrylics. It appeared to be more substantial than a tent – barely; but it looked and sounded like a deserted airplane hanger filled with sprinting and jostling players, and shouting spectators.

 

I decided to ignore the din and cacophony of this place and concentrate on the reasons I was there – to watch my daughter play basketball, and absorb enough game details to keep up with her post-game analysis on the drive home. As one game was ending, I made my way up the shaky, temporary bleachers. I sat down and searched the court for Prisa. I spied her conferring with Kari, her co-captain, as the other girls were warming up and shooting around the basket. Prisa and Kari were the only seniors on a team filled with short underclasswomen, and a cadre of very talented freshman. The pair had been on varsity for four years, and inherited the roles of leaders for this year’s squad. Despite losing 5 varsity players to graduation, these captains were committed to improving on last year’s record, and rejected the notion of a “rebuilding year”. As evidence of this determination, Prisa waived her final year of volleyball to help direct the Basketball Conditioning sessions in the fall of 1997. This was a pre-season strength and conditioning program that allowed the coaching staff to assess their new and returning players before scheduled games and tournaments could begin. Coaches were not allowed to hold games or scrimmages during this period, but players were permitted to play on club teams - as long as their coaches were not present or guiding them. This lack of formal coaching made for low-key, low-stress games. No one kept score, and stats were rarely maintained; the point of the games was to let the kids play, and not on winning. A designated father, mother, or adult volunteer, stepped into the temporary role of coach for the game, and he or she would shuttle the players in and out.


The quaking of the bleachers signaled the transition to the next game. Sweaty and tussle-haired players climbed up the ascending benches to greet their supporters, merging with the descending spectators heading to the exits.  Searching for a better place to sit, I noticed that Prisa had walked over to the bottom of the bleachers and was waving me down.

“What’s up?” I asked, reaching the floor after a slow descent.

“Dad, I need to ask you for a favor”, she said in an odd manner, sliding up close to me.

“Sure” I replied quickly bringing up my right arm to hug her. I imagined that she probably needed me to recover something she had forgotten in the car, or at home.

“You really won’t have to do much, Dad, Kari and I will keep track of the substitutions, fouls, and plays; all you’ll have to do is sit there - it will be really simple”. All this was said in one quick and breathless sentence.

“Uhhh, what did you say?” I replied slowly, not trusting my hearing. “What do you need me to do?”

“I need you to be the coach, Dad. Kari’s dad couldn’t make it and there is no one else available”.

I felt as if the rotation of the earth had stopped, and everything was frozen in time. I was alone in the universe, facing my worst nightmare scenario: being asked for a personal favor, by my only daughter, to perform a simple, but terrifying task. My daughter was asking me to do the impossible – coaching a team.

 

There are only three actions I cannot conceive of ever performing: touching and distributing the transubstantiated Body of Jesus Christ as a host in Communion; performing medical surgery on any body; and coaching a sports team. I firmly believed that these tasks were the exclusive domain of unique individuals who were blessed with extraordinary talents and abilities. They were people who were born to be priests or ministers, doctors, medics, or nurses, and team coaches or managers. These were true vocations, special callings, which required rigorous training, dedicated practice, and faithful devotion. Admittedly, I had lightly dabbled in coaching when I volunteered as an assistant on my son’s early soccer and baseball teams, and my daughter’s softball teams; but these were amateurish, supporting efforts that ended with high school sports. I came to truly appreciate the complexity and intricacy of high school coaching when Prisa joined the varsity basketball team as a freshman. The newly hired husband and wife team (Mr. Coach and Mrs. Coach, as they were known) established a sophisticated program that raised the level of fitness, skill development, and game performance at Louisville High School. Prisa’s talents and understanding of basketball increased logarithmically under their tutelage, and I happily assumed the role of spectator and fan. I saw that she was playing the game at a level I never imagined, and understood it better than I ever would. Now that player was putting me in an impossible position.
 

 

I never refused Prisa anything she urgently needed or wanted (and she never asked for much); but I never accepted a task I wasn’t confident in performing adequately. I was a school principal of seven years, the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of a multi-million dollar operation, and the instructional leader of more than 70 teachers and 1800 students, but I was haunted by the primordial fear of being exposed as a fraud. I was trained as a teacher and administrator, but never as a manager of the types of emergencies and crises that can erupt on a school campus. Only 22 years of professional experiences gave me the brashness to face, engage, and deal with them – always realizing I was a hair’s breadth away from disaster. I was only as qualified as I believed myself to be. I was not about to knowingly assume a task, in public view, that I felt myself unqualified to perform.

“Dad, I know I’m asking you to do something you hate” she said, placing her head against my shoulder and looking up at me. “I would never let you be embarrassed. Trust me. Kari and I will do the coaching; I just need you to sit on the bench”.

I looked down at her pleading expression and imagined that it kept alternating as the face of the baby girl I rocked to sleep in my arms, and the mocking face of Chuck Barris, convincing an untalented contestant to make a fool of himself on the Gong Show.

“There has to be someone else we can find” I suggested, weakly.

“No, Dad, you’re our last hope. If you don’t do it, we’ll have to forfeit”. Her decisive tone resounded as loudly as the striking of the humiliating gong.

“Okay, honey” I said, letting go of my fears and placing my ego in the hands of my 17 year old daughter. “I’ll do it”.

Resignedly, I walked to the player’s bench and sat down. From that moment on, the velocity of actions and movements of the people around me, and on the floor, increased to match my speeding heart rate. Prisa, Kari, and eight other girls took the court, and, with the tipoff and start of the clock on the scoreboard, I was engulfed in a blizzard of shifting bodies. Uniformed shapes and squealing sneakers sprinted up and down the floor, transitioning from offense to defense, shooting and passing the ball, committing fouls and being fouled, shouting encouragements, setting plays, and giving directions. It was a confusing and humbling experience. I felt naked in the midst of a tempest, bereft of shelter and with no understanding of the elements that buffeted me. Suddenly the buzzer sounded, and the first half came to a close. During the abbreviated intermission, Prisa finished talking to the team and came up to me.

“You’re doing a great job, Dad,” she said, reassuringly, patting me on the shoulder “I’m really proud of you”.
 

 

Twelve years later, I walked into another gymnasium for the first time to see Prisa in a game of basketball between the Knights of Bishop Montgomery and St. Mary’s Academy of Inglewood. This time she was not playing, she was coaching. Stopping under the backboard at one end of the court to get my bearings, I happily noticed that this building was built in the reassuring, classic multipurpose design of the late 1950’s. There was a raised theatre stage on one side and rising bleachers on the other. The team benches were aligned on the stage side of the floor, with folding chairs set up along the baseline. Prisa was sitting on the stage, with a clipboard in hand, studying the day’s line up and game plan. There were two groups of players at each end of the court shooting and rebounding, but I couldn’t tell which were Prisa’s until the girls nearest me began staring, pointing, and whispering to one another. Girl athletes, as opposed to boys, are never indifferent to the parents of their coach, and their curiosity betrays them. As I walked over to Prisa, she hopped down from the stage when she saw me and gave me a hug.

“Hi dad, I’m glad you made it. Did you have any trouble getting here?”

“No, it was easy. I had a high school friend who lived near here, on Praire. I haven’t driven this route in years”.  Realizing that she didn’t have time to listen to my rambling memories, I changed the subject. “So, how has your team been doing?”

“We’ve been struggling” she explained. “Two of our players were out of town for Christmas, and two more couldn’t make the last game. Our practices have been uneven, and the girls are distracted. We’ve lost our last three games.”

“Ouch!” I exclaimed. “Sorry to hear that. Maybe your luck will change, now that I’m here. In fact, I think you should tell the players that I’ll be taking their pictures and bringing them luck today”.

“I’ll do that, Dad”, she said with a laugh.

“So, what kind or talent do you have this year?” I resumed, questioningly.

“Well”, she replied, “the Varsity coach drafted all the promising freshmen players. Her team is already loaded with talent, so the freshmen won’t see much game time. It’s too bad really, but I understand the advantages of practicing with the varsity team. We still have a good team, with some strong juniors. We have height, speed, and depth. In each of our last 3 games we came back from early deficits to tie the score, but then we lost momentum. The other teams just wanted it more. We have the talent – we just need to put our game together”.

A tall, strong-looking, ponytailed blonde player came bounding up to us. She was one of the girls who had noted my entrance into the gym. Prisa introduced her to me as the team captain and then gave her instructions.

“Be sure everyone has stretched and warmed up” she said carefully, “then bring the team together for a meeting”.

As the captain jogged back to her teammates, I said, “Well, coach, we’ll talk after the game. I’ll let you get back to your team. I’ll just watch and take pictures”.

“Great”, she replied, “Joe should be coming by later, so he can keep you company during the game”.

 


It is a treat and a blessing for a parent to watch their adult children performing their chosen professions or vocations. I’ve been fortunate to see Prisa teach one of her English classes, and now I was finally watching her coach. Last year she worked as an assistant, implementing the philosophy and game plans of the head coach. This year she was in charge, and it was her team. Fifteen girls of various sizes, shapes, and mannerisms huddled around her, at the far end of the bench. Watching her speak and interact with her players, reminded me of how she acted in class. She spoke softly and intently, used her hands for emphasis, and interjected lighthearted humor and joking banter. However, there was more intensity in the huddle that in a classroom. These girls wanted to be here, and on this team. The varsity coach had already picked over the players; so there would be no more promotions to varsity. This was the last season for all the juniors on the team. The players who remained were playing for love of the game. This was the essence of sport; to learn and play a game because you love to learn and play it. In high school, Prisa had willingly stayed at the JV level in volleyball and softball just to experience the joy of practice and performance; rather than practicing and watching on the varsity, she preferred playing on JV.

 

When the game started I joined Joe, Prisa’s fiancé, in the stands to watch and photograph. I enjoy watching basketball, even though I don’t recognize all the technical aspects of the game without the assistance of a commentator or coach. I can usually identify a zone defense, man-to-man coverage, and a full-court press, but after that I don’t know what is really going on beyond the scoring. That is why I love watching the Pac-10 Tournament with Prisa; she constantly updates me on the defensive sets, the plays, and the adjustments that go on during a game. She is so good at it, that spectators in front, and to our sides, would constantly engage her in conversation and discussion. When I’m alone, I just watch the guards, the ball, and the scoring. Through the lens of my camera, the teams traded baskets for the first quarter, with neither one establishing any consistent momentum or control. Despite Bishop Montgomery’s advantage in height and speed, St. Mary’s kept up with their outside shooting. The Knights would fall behind when they tried matching outside field goals, and then catch up with fast breaks off defensive turnovers, and passes to their forwards for layups. I grew increasingly anxious in the second quarter because Montgomery’s advantages were becoming more obvious, but they were not capitalizing on them. I expressed my apprehensions and nervousness with intermittent shouts of encouragement and emotional reactions: “yes, yes, yes”; “no, no, no”; “rebound, get the rebound”; “look up, look up”; “no, no, no”; “shoot, shoot  – yes!”; “ oohh, nooo”; “get it, get it”; and “put it up”. Joe was kind enough to ignore me. Glancing away from the action on the floor, I’d occasionally look over at Prisa, striding calmly and confidently in front of the team bench. Pausing at different spots along the baseline, she would call out, point, clap encouragement, and give directions to the hustling players who pushed the ball forward on the attack, and retreated on defense. The closest gesture of disapproval was when she stretched out her arms, palms up in supplication, and mouthed the word “What?” at the referees. The game see-sawed back and forth, with neither team gaining the upper hand. At halftime the score was St. Mary’s Academy 18 – Bishop Montgomery 20.
 

 

From my perspective behind the camera, Prisa’s halftime speech was a continuation of the pre-game huddle, and her on-court encouragements. She praised the players for what they were doing correctly, identifying the specific plays, and then reviewed the adjustments that needed to be made. She interspersed jokes, insights, and irony, but there was no hint of disappointment or frustration. I did hear strong echoes of past coaches that Prisa admired and loved. The second half was an entirely different game. Montgomery came out with increased determination and a pressing defense that did not let up, and they slowly increased their lead. When I looked up at the scoreboard in the 3rd quarter, they were ahead by 10 points; when I looked again at the next timeout, the spread had grown to 20. It was at that point that I finally sat back in my seat and relaxed, asking Joe how he was doing in his new position as Athletic Director of Serra High School. As he talked about how much he missed coaching, memories of the club game at Alemany, and my one-and-only high school coaching experience came to mind. I hated every moment of that game, because I felt powerless; I didn’t know what I was doing, or what was going on. Yet, I had to say “Yes” to my daughter or the girls would not play. That game was about trusting Prisa and her teammates, and being willing to appear foolish so they could play and learn in front of family, friends, and strangers. I suppose that is what every coach does when they go out on a court, or on a field of play, with their kids – saying “Yes”, and being willing to appear foolish, or wise, depending on how the team performs.  Observing some of her teaching mannerisms in her coaching style had misled me to suspect that coaching was an extension of teaching for Prisa – but it isn’t. Teachers and administrators do not expose themselves in quite that way in classrooms and schools; they work within segregated spaces and behind closed doors. Coaches have no privacy; they constantly expose themselves to public judgments every game, through their players.
 

 

The Knights coasted to an easy victory, with Prisa substituting her players generously to give everyone lots of time on the court. The final score was St. Mary’s 29 – Bishop Montgomery 62. At the end of the game, after Prisa had congratulated her team and reminded them of practice, I walked over to her and said, “Good game, coach”.  There is something generationally satisfying in watching ones children do something you never could. There is a little envy, and a lot of awe.
 


dedalus_1947: (Default)

I’ve written Valentine’s Day blogs to Kathleen Mavourneen for each of the last two years. One was inspired by an old diary I found in which I described two months in 1974, during our maturing romance (see Valentine’s Day ). The other was prompted by the lyrics to a song I heard the day after New Year’s at Catalina’s Bar and Grill (see On My Way to You ). This year I had no “bolt out of the clear blue sky” inspiration for an essay. The old year came to a close, and the New Year began. As Valentine’s Day approached, I simply felt the need to create something for my wife, the woman I love. What do I want to say? What scenes or memories come to mind? Where do I begin? I suppose the best place to start is at the beginning.

 

The convent on the corner of Manchester Blvd and Stanmoor Drive did not look like a religious cloister. Although it was across the street from a catholic church, there was nothing religious about the two-story, beige colored, stucco structure. It was a copy of the many nondescript apartment houses that abounded in that neighborhood of Westchester. I had driven by this building hundreds of times. Going to, and coming from, high school and work, I never suspected that it was the living quarters of five or six nuns (depending who was in residence) in the religious Community of St. Joseph of Carondelet (CSJ’s). I discovered its secret identity when Sister Marilyn and Sister Carol invited me to the TGIF which they, and their sisters, hosted periodically. Although I don’t recall who actually asked me, I do remember that being invited was a distinct honor. These were special invitations which required the consensus of all the sisters in the house.

 

I knew most of the CSJ’s as fellow faculty and staff members in the same catholic high school in which we worked. They were the largest of the religious orders, and they represented every level of the school hierarchy. They had an assistant principal (Sister Nancy), a department chair (Sister Marilyn), a counselor (Sister Carol), and two teachers (Sisters Margaret and Mona). Given their numbers and influence in the administration and culture of the school, I saw how the more paranoid priests feared some kind of feminine conspiracy or take-over. However, I also noticed that none of these decriers ever sought or requested additional responsibilities beyond their immediate classroom duties. The nuns were always ready to respond constructively to school problems and challenges. Until my invitation, I had no social or personal interactions with women in religious orders. From grades 2 through 8, the sisters who taught me were strict, unsmiling, militaristic martinets. I feared them. This simplistic view of nuns continued in high school, where I was taught solely by priests and male lay instructors, and I believed every prejudice they expressed about the pushy women on the other side of the co-institutional school. I also assumed the nuns who taught the girls were as boring and colorless as the male religious who lectured us. This view changed when I was hired at St. Bernard High School to teach history in January of 1972. Working closely with, for, and among nuns for the first time, especially the CSJ’s, was a mind-expanding, and a stereotype-smashing experience. In my first semester, I found the sisters to be inspirational leaders, conscientious and caring counselors, and skilled teachers. Marilyn, as Social Studies department chair, mentored me through my difficult rookie year. Carol, the consummate counselor, helped keep my humor and spirits up, as I struggled to motivate teenagers who were only 6 years younger than I, and who showed little tolerance for inexperienced teachers. As I became more confident and relaxed in my second year, Marilyn and Carol welcomed me to their table in the Teacher’s Lounge for coffee, cigarettes, and food during recess and lunch. It was during these open-ended chats, discussions, and joke-telling sessions that I came to know them better. When I was invited to their house, I realized I had passed some informal probation period. The moment I walked into their apartment on a Friday night, I knew I was being given an insight into their lives that most Catholics never got. Our interactions became closer and more personal. I became a regular guest, and developed an authentic friendship with Marilyn and Carol.
 

 

One evening at the convent, after a hectic week at school, I was regaling the sisters with stories of living at home with mom and siblings, and my adventures with three high school buddies who lived in an apartment nearby. Holding her stomach in laughter, Marilyn gasped that they wanted to meet these bachelor friends, who provided me a haven for continuous juvenile pursuits. As I tried explaining the importance of frivolous recreation, Carol interrupted with an apparent change of subject.

“Tony, there is a girl we know who I think you should meet”.

“Oh, you mean Kathy” chimed in Marilyn, cutting short her laughter. “She’s wonderful and you both have a lot in common”.

The topic immediately sobered me and brought a frown to my face. Working in an environment of nuns, I had become very wary of their matchmaking abilities. I didn’t have much confidence in their judgment when it came to predicting social chemistry and sexual attraction. I’d seen and met many of their female friends and acquaintances who occasionally visited the school. None of them looked particularly attractive or interesting.

“No thanks, ladies”.  I said gently, not wanting to hurt their feelings.

“It’s not what you think, Tony” countered Carol. “This girl is different. We’ve known her for along time and we really think she’s wonderful”.

“I need you to stop this” I said firmly and impatiently. “I don’t want to be set-up. I appreciate your interest, but I’m fine – really”.

“We’re not talking about a blind date, Tony” Marilyn continued. “Kathy is just somebody we really like and we think you would too”.

“Again, thank you ladies, but I’m not interested in meeting anyone. I’m dating someone right now”. I saw that none of my arguments were having any effect on my cloistered friends; but when I noticed that Carol was angling for another opportunity to weigh into the debate, I changed tack.

“Okay, look, I’ll make you a deal. I’ll agree to meet this girl, but let me be the one to tell you when. Now is not a good time; but I promise to tell you when I’m ready”.

“You promise?” repeated Carol, warily, looking at Marilyn for support.

“I promise” I said, raising my right hand as if taking an oath. Unwillingly, Carol and Marilyn took me at my word and accepted the compromise. They dropped the subject and did not raise it again. I was very pleased with myself for having short circuited their plans. I had no intention of ever asking to meet this girl – but I couldn’t forget the promise I’d made to them.
 

 

Two months after this debate, my affair with a teacher at the school ended. The aftermath of this short-lived infatuation lingered far longer than the relationship itself. I entered a barren period in my life where a meaningful relationship with a woman became a ceaseless longing. I had the company of my family at home, my friends at school, and my three high school buddies, but they were no longer enough. After considerable inner turmoil and debate, I sought out Carol and Marilyn at the lunch table one day and sat next to them.

“Uh, do you remember that conversation we had a while back about the friend you wanted me to meet?” I asked, embarrassedly, as the two nuns looked at each other and then me.

“Yes” they replied in tandem, with secret smiles on their faces.

“Well, I’d like to meet her. Just remember, this is not a date. You are just inviting us to have dinner WITH YOU”.

“Okay” Carol said, “We’ll take care of it”.

 

The girl was already there when I arrived. She was stretched on the living room rug, leaning against the coffee table, in conversation with Sister Mona. Seeing and listening to her was something of a jolt. She was nothing I expected. I had visualized a medium sized, mousy-faced graduate student, who was polite, cautious, quiet, and shy. I assumed any friend of nuns had to have these demur qualities, never making the association that I was their friend, and did not share any of these traits. Kathy was exactly the opposite from the convent girl I imagined. She had sparkling, hazel eyes, and an enchanting, beaming smile. She was tall and slender, with shoulder-length, and sun streaked, dark blonde hair. She had long, flowing legs, arms, hands and fingers; and glowed with vitality as she exploded with humor and laughter. Kathy took over the room and captivated the guests with stories of her family and college experiences. I’ve since learned that the on-stage persona dominating the awkward moments of introductory conversation emerges out of nervousness, and the desire to put people at ease. At the time, Kathy made everyone laugh and feel comfortable, as she asked questions, elaborated on answers, and made jokes. I had always thought my family was weird and funny. I was born into a Mexican-American family of 4 boys, 2 girls, and a widowed mother who clung to nostalgic memories of her aristocratic, Mexican family who had been displaced and dispossessed by the Revolution. However, Kathy’s stories of her Irish-American family, of 2 brothers, 7 sisters, 2 in-laws, and surgeon father, made mine seem bland. She was a classic storyteller, who tickled your curiosity, built up suspense, and then surprised you with an unexpected twist or ironic ending. It was more of a performance, than a conversation, but I managed to join in as drinks were served.
 

 

At the conclusion of dinner, a pretext arose to change gears, and prolong the evening in another venue. Sister Nancy needed to return to St. Bernard to recover a forgotten report in her office. Kathy and I volunteered to accompany her on the drive to the nearby high school. This opportunity gave me a chance to be alone with Kathy. I gave her a tour of the school I worked in, and spoke of my days there as a student. I told her of my teachers, the time I ditched during a day-long religious retreat (only to be caught returning to campus), and my days as a soccer player. I suppose I was trying to impress her as we walked to the football stadium, down the bleachers, and onto the track. There she challenged me to a foot race. I don’t remember who won, but I do recall her long strides, her flowing hair, and the out-of-breath laughter that ended the contest. Her lack of formal constraints and inhibitions enchanted me. I knew I needed to see her again. The problem was when to ask. To do so then, on the same evening we met, struck me as desperate; too pushy and overeager. I let the matter lie until we returned to the convent for coffee. When I asked Marilyn and Carol what they were planning that weekend, they said they were driving to Coachella Valley the following morning to join a United Farm Worker’s demonstration. They were long-time supporters of Cesar Chavez’s efforts to unionize farm workers, and wanted to help. Kathy was spending the night and going along. Here was the perfect excuse for a second meeting without betraying my interest in her. I explained my support of the Grape Strike and the UFW and asked Marilyn if I could join them. “Sure” she said, “but we’re leaving at 6 o’clock, so you’ll have to get up early”. When I left the convent, I shook Kathy’s hand, saying it was nice meeting her, and I told Marilyn and Carol that I would “try to join” them in the morning. The next day at 5:45 A.M., I was parked outside, waiting impatiently for 6 o’clock to knock on the convent door.
 

 

The drive to Coachella was a test of sorts. I wanted to see if the spell cast the previous evening would survive the harsh glare of day, and the rigors of a long car trip. If anything, Kathy looked different and better. In the clear light of the morning, with none of the evening glamour, Kathy looked relaxed and lovelier. She was dressed in faded Levis and a long-sleeve, creamy-green, collarless blouse that accentuated her shape and stature. She had tied her hair back into a long ponytail, so her cheekbones, nose, chin, and neck showed a sharper profile. On the road trip to the demonstration, she again controlled the tone and tenor of the conversation, keeping it lose and lively. She solicited information and opinions from all of the passengers, and then expressed her own views with a mixture of jokes, witty observations, commentary on schools, nuns, priests, and her family. I learned a lot about her family on that journey, although I wasn’t sure how much was hyperbole or fact. I tried to join in, but found I enjoyed just listening to her voice, her laughter, and the way she made other people laugh. One would think that a trip to a worker-owner confrontation, at a time of violent encounters, would have been memorable, but all I remember of the trip is riding in the car with Kathy. The imperative to see her again increased steadily all day; but I wanted to see her alone, without the annoying presence of other people. I wanted to be with her, speak only to her, and she only to me. As we were unloading the car on our return to the convent, I suddenly found myself standing alone with her for a moment. Realizing that this might be my only opportunity before leaving, I blurted out my mentally rehearsed question.

“Uhhh, Kathy, can I see you again?” An eternity passed before she answered.

“Sure, that would be great” she said with a bewitching smile. “I’d like that”.

The euphoria of hearing the words “sure”, “great”, and “like”, all in the same sentence, accompanied by a gorgeous smile, sent me into ecstasy. I said goodbye, gave Carol and Marilyn big hugs, and walked to my car in a haze of delight. It wasn’t until I arrived home that I realized I had not asked for her phone number; but even that oversight did not alter my mood. I would correct it later.
 

 

36 years have passed since that blissful Saturday afternoon when Kathy said “Sure!” I am no longer the arrogant boy who did not trust two friends who knew me better than I knew myself. I am no longer the slender and impassioned young man who tried so hard to attract and impress a lovely young woman. I’ve grown old, fat, and lazy; but sometimes the magic happens, and I find myself in a romantic time warp. This year I asked Kathy to accompany me to my school’s Christmas Dinner. No matter how one approaches them, large faculty dinner parties are difficult and awkward events for principals. They are incompatible mixtures of formal business and social festivities. Principals are never “just a guest”; they are always “the boss”. The principal must meet, greet, introduce, and chat with employees, their spouses, loved ones, and guests. It is a lot of work, and I usually don’t ask Kathy to attend. For the last two years, I had gone alone. However, this year I wanted Kathy’s company. This is my last year at MASH Middle School and I wanted this last Christmas dinner to be memorable. Over the last two years, my leadership team of administrators, coordinators, and counselors had really come together. They are a great group to work with and be around; they work hard, support each other, and love to laugh and have fun. I had mentioned them often to Kathy and I especially wanted her to meet them – and they her. I also wanted to have fun, and Kathy’s presence, conversation, and humor would distract me from the more formal and annoying aspects of the party, and allow me to enjoy myself.

 

The evening began in the usual fashion. We came home from work, dressed, drove, arrived, and greeted the hostesses and early guests. Then, while standing in the bar line to buy drinks, I heard a familiar and enchanting voice, with a touch of Irish humor, describing the upcoming wedding of our daughter. I looked around to see my radiant wife surrounded by a bevy of youthful coordinators and assistant principals gazing up at her in wonder. They were listening to every word and laughing at her stories of the nuptial preparations and difficulties. By the time I returned and handed her a drink, the coordinators were asking her questions about her school, her job as principal, and our family. As they listened to her responses, they kept smiling at the two of us, standing side by side, holding hands.

 

As we drove home that evening, I leaned over and kissed Kathy on the cheek.

“Thanks for coming along this evening. You were wonderful”.

“You’re welcome, babe”, she replied with a smile.

I looked sideways at her, and smiled back as the words of my favorite Eric Clapton song came to mind. They seemed to fit my mood perfectly on that Friday night:
 

 

It’s late in the evening; she’s wondering what clothes to wear.

She puts on her makeup and brushes her long blonde hair.

And then she asks me, “Do I look all right?”

And I say, “Yes, you look wonderful tonight.”

 

We go to a party and everyone turns to see

This beautiful lady who’s walking around with me.

And then she asks me, “Do you feel all right?”

And I say, “Yes, I feel wonderful tonight.”

 

I feel wonderful because I see

The love light in your eyes.

And the wonder of it all

Is that you don’t realize how much I love you.

 

It’s time to go home now and I’ve got an aching head,

So I give her the car keys, and she helps me into bed.

And then I tell her, as I turn out the light,

“Oh my darling, you were wonderful tonight”.

 



On this Valentine’s Day of 2009, I just want to say, I love you Kathleen Mavourneen, as much today as on the first day I saw you.

 

dedalus_1947: (Default)


In today’s sharp sparkle, this winter air,

any thing can be made, any sentence begun.

On the brink, on the brim, on the cusp,

praise song for walking forward in that light.

(Praise Song for the Day, Inaugural Poem by Elizabeth Alexander)

 



In the pre-dawn chill of Inauguration Day, sitting together on the flat, frigid, and windswept plain, there was little desire to move, talk, or joke. Communication and action was reduced to the barest essentials to conserve warmth. We spoke in quick questions and statements; like, “What’s the time? My toes are frozen. When will the sun come up?”  Instead of sharing impressions of the dawn, our thoughts were internalized, and we concentrated on the temperature, and how our bodies were reacting to it. I had never spent so much time completely at the mercy of the glacial elements of winter, without shelter or external covering. Our only defense against hypothermia was the clothing we wore. Together, Prisa and I passed seven hours on the National Mall waiting for the Swearing-In ceremony and speech. During that time, I gained a new appreciation for arctic gear and a healthy respect for the vagaries of freezing conditions. My personal observations were that cold seems to come in waves of intensity, and the sun doesn’t help much. There were intervals when I felt very cold and then, not-so-cold; periods when it seemed that the people around us were human generators of heat and warmth, and then a gust of frigid air would blow out their pilot lights and turn them into icicles radiating frost. I noticed this tendency mostly with my fingers and toes. Even when I wasn’t exposing my digits to the open air to adjust my camera or take a picture, my fingers (and toes) would alternate between feeling stiff, aching, and frostbitten, to being soft, flexible, and whole. I couldn’t understand it. Whether using mittens (as I did) or gloves (as Prisa did), there was no way to control the undulating phases of cold. We came to the fatalistic conclusion that no amount of clothing or insulated layering was adequate defense to the unrelenting rhythms of cold. Our only hope was the certainty that the morning would end. However, the rising sun didn’t make that much difference. The day turned sparkling and sharp, but the undulating rhythms of cold continued throughout. Looking back at how we fared during those seven hours, I think 3 factors helped us survive: woolen scarves and hats, music, and human company.
 

 

As a Los Angeles native, and a lifetime Southern California resident, I never used knit caps and scarves for the cold. I considered those items snow gear, ill suited for the infrequent rainfall and rarely cold mornings and evenings of a semi-arid, desert climate. I especially didn’t understand them as gifts. I considered scarves to be bright and wooly ladies neckwear, which women used to accessorize their coats and sweaters. I believed that scarves, like neckties, were decorative, and not at all functional. These notions shattered like thin ice on the morning of January 20. It did not matter that the sun was up, or that Washington D.C. was a southern city, my ears, nose, and throat (mouth) were the most sensitive and vulnerable parts of my anatomy, and they were taking a beating in this weather. With temperatures ranging in the mid to low 20 degrees, and wind chill blasts driving it occasionally lower, I constantly thanked God for the flannel cap that covered my head and ears, and my scarf, which covered my mouth and nose. Yet even these key accessories couldn’t compare with the beneficial effects that music had on the beleaguered spectators. At about 8:30, event technicians began testing the sound system on the Mall. Instead of a disembodied, monotone voice chanting “Check, check, check”, the speakers would suddenly explode with music and songs. We couldn’t tell if the music came from a radio or MP3 player, because it never lasted long. However, those intermittent and brief snippets of music were enough to lift our spirits and give us hope. We would sing along and rock with the longer, more popular pieces, and then boo when the testing terminated and the music stopped.

“The organizers could be really helpful if they just let the music play” Prisa said in a muffled voice, through her neck-scarf.

“Really” I agreed. “It would sure help to keep our minds off the cold”.

“It would; you know, I heard that they were thinking of showing the entire HBO Concert from last Sunday”.

“Wow that would be great” I said, praying that this was more than a rumor.

The testing continued for 15 more minutes and then stopped completely. A little later, as we were hopping up and down, and bouncing from foot to foot, trying to increase circulation; the giant monitor jumped suddenly to life. The title on the screen read “We Are One: The Obama Inaugural Celebration”, and the bundled masses on the Mall broke into wild cheers and muffled clapping. Prisa’s information had been correct, for over 90 minutes we were treated to a reprise of the HBO concert that took place two days before in front of the Lincoln Memorial. It was only then that we felt the sun’s presence, and the day’s promise. Our thoughts moved away from ourselves, the cold, and our discomfort, and focused on the speakers, the musicians, and the music. It was wonderful – from Bruce Springsteen’s “The Rising”, through Garth Brooks’ renditions of “American Pie” and “Shout”, to U2’s singing “In the the Name of Love” - we traveled the breadth of American’s gospel, soul, folk, and rock and roll music . We sang, we swayed, and we danced; more important we warmed. The heat wasn’t coming from the sun, but from the beaming smiles, infectious laughter, and bounding energy of the people around us. Bodies were moving and walking again. There was a renewed migration of individuals, pairs, and bands of people from the back of the Mall to the front. This new wave of “squatters” was looking for better locations and closer views. They filled every nook and cranny of empty space they could find. Ground that was used for lounging and sleeping during the darkened hours of the morning now filled with late arriving settlers. The crowd became denser and friendlier. As James Taylor and Pete Seeger performed, I focused my camera on the faces of the men and women around me, the young, the old, the cheery, and the intense. I wanted to record the faces of these witnesses, the people who had come from far and near to be here today. When the concert ended after 10:30, the video screen transitioned into showing a procession of dignitaries and guests. We saw Dustin Hoffman, Oprah Winfrey, the diplomatic corps, Steven Spielberg, and countless people who had gained the preferred seating areas under the Capitol portico. However, nothing was more impressive, or received the biggest cheer, than the live, overhead views of the Mall itself with its miles and miles of people. From the Capitol Building to beyond the Washington Monument, men, women, and children cheered and waved flags at the sight of themselves. We learned later that we totaled over 1.7 million spectators in this vast, sprawling area. At the time, we simply felt as One.
 

 

The official Inaugural ceremonies began at 11 o’clock with musical selections by the Marine Band and the Boys and Girls Chorus of San Francisco. During this interlude the video broadcast would break off to show the arriving members of the House and Senate, new cabinet members and former presidents. The only negative sound to emanate from the viewing throng during the entire experience was the booing at the pictures of President Bush and Vice-president Cheney. The moment was awkward and embarrassing, because it reminded me of how I scold my students at election assemblies to always cheer FOR candidates, never against them. We choose by our vote, I tell them, we don’t demean candidates, or former officers, by booing and catcalling. The lapse in decorum passed as soon as the camera shifted to a picture of Barack Obama, in the hallway of the Capitol, waiting to enter. This initial part of the agenda served as an audio and visual countdown to the Swearing-In, and like a late morning rocket launch, it generated a growing build-up of anticipation. The tension finally climaxed as the trumpet fanfare signaled the start of the events, and whoops and cheering greeted Senator Dianne Feinstein as she stepped to the podium to call the convocation to order and guide the proceedings. In a multitude of almost 2 million people, I was struck by the noticeable hush that descended on the Mall when the program started. Without hum or murmurings, all eyes and ears were locked on the giant screens, with an occasional glance at the Capitol building and portico. Up until this moment, I had felt bonded with the crowd by our common desire to be there, and having withstood the arduous morning. In the eerie stillness, my excitement faltered. From our distant location on the Mall, we could barely see the miniscule figures on the ledge in front of the Capitol. They were so far away and so tiny. If we couldn’t actually SEE Barack Obama, what were we doing here? Why had I travelled 2,000 miles, missed two days of work, and suffered the ravages of the raw elements? The self-pitying questions surprised me, but I managed to push them aside when I scanned the confident and happy faces of the people around me. Their expectant and excited features reassured me that my feelings were crazy, and a symptom of fatigue.
 

 

The introduction of the Reverend Rick Warren also distracted me from my doubts. His selection to give the Invocation had caused considerable controversy in the media because of some earlier criticisms of homosexuality, and I wondered if any of the previously manifested anti-Bush sentiment would reappear. There was none. In fact the “padre” helped vanquish my self-doubts by encapsulating the reasons for our presence on that Mall with a prayer. He carefully and thoughtfully constructed a psalm for our new president. Tears welled up in my eyes at the power of the words sent directly to God’s ear:

 

“Let us pray… The Scripture tells us, Hear, oh Israel, the Lord is our God; the Lord is one. And you are the compassionate and merciful one. And you are loving to everyone you have made.

 

Now today we rejoice not only in America’s peaceful transfer of power for the 44th time. We celebrate a hinge-point of history with the inauguration of our first African-American president of the United States.

 

We are so grateful to live in this land, a land of unequaled possibility, where the son of an African immigrant can rise to the highest level of our leadership.

 

And we know today that Dr. King and a great cloud of witnesses are shouting in Heaven.

 

Give to our new president, Barack Obama, the wisdom to lead us with humility, the courage to lead us with integrity, the compassion to lead us with generosity. Bless and protect him and his family.

 

Help us, oh God, to remember that we are Americans, united not by race or religion or blood, but to our commitment to freedom and justice for all.

 

When we focus on ourselves, when we fight each other, when we forget you, forgive us. When we presume that our greatness and our prosperity is ours alone, forgive us. When we fail to treat our fellow human beings and all the Earth with the respect that they deserve, forgive us.

 

And as we face these difficult days ahead, may we have a new birth of clarity in our aims, responsibility in our actions, humility in our approaches, and civility in our attitudes, even when we differ…”

 

“Do you have a Kleenex, Prisa?” I asked at the completion of the ‘Our Father (The Lord’s Prayer)’. Throughout the latter part of the Invocation I had been fighting back sobs and my flowing mucus.

“No, sorry Dad” she replied, looking at my reddening eyes with concern. “Are you okay?”

“Yea” I said, “but I need to blow my nose”. I was forced to use my mittens as a handkerchief until I got my nose under control.
 

 

After the Invocation, Prisa and I stood side-by-side, carefully listening to the rest of the ceremonies. The strongest and longest cheers of the day burst forth when President Obama said “So help me God” at the conclusion of his Oath of Office. Prisa and I hugged, and then I re-positioned myself to record the waving flags, embracing couples, and ear-to-ear smiles, with my camera. In that instant, seeing those faces, and feeling the energy of our numbers, I KNEW why Prisa and I had traveled so far and so long to be there at that moment. We were NOT there to SEE Barack Obama; we could get a better view at home, on our HDTV. We were there to be with him at this moment, so HE COULD SEE US: not Oprah, not Spielberg, not any one single person on the Mall – but so he could SEE ALL OF US AS ONE. We came together in that instant, for that reason. We were almost 2 million Americans being seen by one man from a high and lonely precipice, on the portico of the nation’s Capitol. The problems our nation faced and the tasks that awaited him were perilous and daunting. This was a moment when he needed to see the people who trusted him and were ready to brave the uncertain future with him. We were there to reassure him that he wasn’t alone. I imagined how we looked to him, and I prayed that we were an awesome and inspiring sight. I put my arm around Prisa, squeezed her close, and listened to the new president’s first speech.
 

 

The inaugural oration lacked the soaring eloquence and sweeping scope of the speeches he gave in Iowa and New Hampshire, in the first months of the primaries. Those were the high flying days when his rhetoric billowed with idealism and optimism. The phrases and style he used at that time were the Obama 1.0 version of his speeches; their freshness grabbed and held our attention, inspiring hopefulness and the promise of change. However, over the course of the long and arduous campaign, and with the collapse of the financial and economic system of the country, these messages changed and evolved. Slowly, his discourses became more logistical, factual, and concrete. The inaugural address continued this hardnosed and mature style. He described his Vision of hope and promise for the nation, but his message was truthful, realistic, and grim. President Obama did not sugar-coat the nation’s problems, nor offer inspirational platitudes. He also did not recite a convenient sound bite which journalists could repeat to characterize his administration – no New Deal, New Frontier, or Great Society quote was provided. The one phrase that probably captured the no-nonsense spirit of his theme was “Starting today, we must pick yourselves up, dust ourselves off, and begin the work of remaking America”. Prisa and I hung on his every word. We were moved by his speech, and we accepted the challenges that he framed for us and the nation. We cheered ourselves weak at the end. Together, we were concluding a journey that began over a year ago. It started when Prisa piqued my curiosity about this young, African-American Senator by telling me she was working on his presidential campaign (see Whisper of Hope). It was ending with a new president, here on the Mall of Washington D.C., on Wednesday, January 20, 2009.
 

 

The long day’s adventure drew to a close as Prisa and I sat warmly and snuggly at the bar of Kavanaugh’s Pub, on Wisconsin Ave. I ordered a beer for my soon-to-be wed daughter, and together we toasted and drank to the President Barack Obama - the First Citizen of the United States of America. As she lowered her glass, Prisa let out one final whoop:

 

“Woowhoo, Obama!”

 

 

dedalus_1947: (Default)

Some live by love they neighbor as thyself,

others by first do no harm or take no more

than you need. What if the mightiest word is love?

Love beyond marital, filial, national,

love that casts a widening pool of light,

love with no need to pre-empt grievance.

(Praise Song for the Day, Inaugural Poem by Elizabeth Alexander)

 



“I think this is as far as we can go”, I said breathlessly, glancing up at the annoying strobes, flashing from the malfunctioning spotlights suspended near the video “jumbo-tron” screen.

“We could probably get closer to the barriers, but then we’d lose sight of the screen”, Prisa mused, raising herself on tip-toes to survey the 5 to 8 yards between us and the fencing along 4th Street. “This is a good place to stop” she concluded, exhaling and sending a cloud of warm mist into the freezing morning air. We were being joined by a constant flow of hooded, scarved, and heavily jacketed settlers who had followed us across the National Mall, in Washington D.C. Like latter day Sooners, we were slowing from our initial sprint across the acres of worn winter grass to stake our claims at this spot. The imaginary land rush began the moment we topped the mound of the Washington Monument and saw only a vast tract of open territory between that towering obelisk and the eastern boundary of the public viewing area of the Inauguration. With every step we took, we accelerated our pace in the frigid morning, and sped past the buildings and landmarks we had noted the day before: the Smithsonian, the National Carousel, and the MSNBC trailer at 7th Street. The darkness of the early morning was interrupted by beams of narrow light cast by towers set at regular intervals along the Mall. Guided by these beacons we traversed 4 divided viewing areas before we came to a stop near 4th Street. We had come to the limits of our land claiming stampede.


 

As Prisa looked around to select her finally spot, I took stock of her location. The metal scaffolding to our right supported enough lighting to allow a determined GW student to read a hardbound novel. The last of a series of five jumbo video screens hovered to our left; and straight ahead, bathed in sparkling illumination, rose the gleaming white National Capitol. Red, white, and blue bunting and banners festooned the multi-layered portico which faced the Mall. This was it – the best, free spot on the Mall, except for the fortunate few in the exclusive seated and standing areas surrounding the capitol dais.

“Okay, chula” I said. “I think this is as far as I can take you. You can see everything here. Are you good?”

“Yup” my daughter replied cheerily. “This is great. I’ll be fine, don’t worry”.

“I’ll try calling you when I reach the ticket entrance, and we can stay in touch before the swearing in”.

“Okay, Dad. I’ll be fine. I’ll just sit down here and wait”.

The people around us had already started spreading blankets, chairs, and tarps on the ground, settling in for the long wait ahead. An enterprising quartet of friends seeking more warmth had confiscated a trash receptacle and transformed it into a waist-high, circular, cardboard barricade. Another settler behind her had spread a large white cardboard mat on the ground as insulation for his red blanket. The flannel rug stood out like a crimson postage stamp on a square white envelope.

“Okay then, Prisa” I said guiltily. “I think I’ll take off. Hopefully, the sooner I’m in line, the better my chances at a good spot in the center of the mall”.

“All right, Dad. I’ll be fine – really. Don’t worry”.

Unfortunately, I was worried. I was second guessing my decision to leave Prisa behind and proceed to another site on the Mall.
 

 

I kept thinking of the wide silver card I was carrying protectively in a plastic souvenir bag. The ticket was an exclusive invitation from Congressman Howard Berman to enter a special area between 4th and 3rd Streets, just ahead of Prisa’s location. Yesterday, we had queued up at 10:00 A.M. in front of the Rayburn Congressional office building on Independence Avenue to receive the silver ticket, and plead for an extra one for my daughter. That hope was soon dashed when the congressional assistant told us that we would have to return after 5 o’clock to see if anyone had failed to pick up their ticket. I was convinced that the chances for success were bleak, and not worth the rigors and travel difficulties of returning in six hours. My guilt over this decision was somewhat alleviated when, upon surveying the map and the actual viewing areas in front of the Capitol, we saw that we would be relatively close to each other on the Mall. I would be on one side of 4th Street and Prisa on the other. This sense of proximity gave us renewed courage, and we began sketching our game plan for Inauguration Morning as we walked around the Capitol and Mall. Beginning at 4:00 A.M., we would catch the first bus on Wisconsin Ave in Glover Park, and take it to the limits of the No-vehicle Zone at Washington Circle, near the Foggy Bottom Metro. From there we’d walk down 23rd Street to the Mall and then dash across it for 4th Street. Once settled, I would leave Prisa in place and make my way to the Silver Entrance at 3rd Street and Independence and get in line to wait until the gates opened at 8:30 A.M. So far, the only hitch to this plan was the failure of the bus to appear at 4 o’clock. We had waited forlornly at the bus stop for over 30 minutes in the freezing cold. After watching countless empty taxi cabs drive past, we decided that a warm car was worth the added expenditure. The speedy taxi ride proved even more fortuitous, because the driver was able to travel beyond our original drop-off point and deliver us on Constitution Ave at the edge of the Mall. Warmed and optimistic from the fast and comfortable journey, we joined the bands of early spectators who were making their way down the Mall. My 28 year old daughter had been my constant companion throughout our three days of travel, exploration, and planning. Now, in this semi-lit, cold, and barren place, I was at the point of leaving her alone.

“Okay” I repeated, trying to reassure myself that the time and difficulties spent in procuring my ticket demanded that it be used. Prisa had urged me to do so yesterday, and nothing had changed to prevent it. I gave her a wide, encompassing, bear-hug and a kiss on the cheek, and said, “I’ll see you when we have a new president. I love you, and thanks for coming with me”.

“I love you too, Dad. I wouldn’t have missed this for the world. I’m fine”.
 

 

I strode quickly away, refusing to look back. I kept telling myself that Prisa was a mature adult, a veteran high school teacher, and a coach. She was not the little girl of 8 who I once left for 2 hours, with her 10 year old brother, to wait for me at the Northridge Mall in Los Angeles while I went into a bookstore. That had been a scary misadventure. I brushed those memories aside and concentrated on the plan and the mental map I had drawn up showing the streets I needed to reach. I assumed that this second half of our game plan would go as well as the first. I made my way to the corner of our enclosed section, hoping to find a quick exit to 4th Street, so I could take it south one block to Independence Ave. There I would turn left toward 3rd and my entrance gate. However, I couldn’t get out. There was a security guard blocking my way at the nearest break in the fence.

“You can’t exit from here” the rotund guard said, as I approached. “You need to go back and find another exit”.

“All right” I replied, not worried about the redirection; in fact, I had expected them earlier. I had read about extensive road closures, and closed access routes; but none had materialized until now. I walked quickly away, along the dimly lit gravel pathway that paralleled the grassy mall, but did not receive much light. It was a cold but quiet walk, with no one other travelers going my way. Looking to my right, I could see clusters of people in all ages, sizes, and groupings streaming steadily along the illuminated mall. The walking warmed me, and I grew more confident of my actions. Suddenly a broad street opened to my left. Approaching another barred fence with more security guards, I saw a sea of faces and torsos pressed behind it. A sigh of dread escaped me when I saw no clear way out. Worse, I could see nothing to indicate that there were any lines or movement of people along Independence Ave, beyond the massed bodies behind the perimeter. I could only see wave after wave of people behind the barrier, staring at me and wondering how I was on the other side of the blockade that prevented them from entering the mall.
 

 

I walked up to a friendly looking guard and asked, “Is there an exit to Independence from here?”

“No sir” he replied, courteously, in a mild southern accent. “You can’t get out from here. We’ve been holding these people back for about an hour. We’ll be letting them in soon. You don’t want to be around when we let them go”.

Those well meaning words unleashed a series of apocalyptic vignettes in my head. I imagined myself the Flying Dutchman of the Mall, doomed to sail on an endless quest to circumvent these barriers and find a passage out. I saw a tidal wave of bodies cresting the wire mesh levies and inundating the vast expanse of the mall behind me, putting an incalculable mass of humanity and distance between Prisa and me. I saw myself being overwhelmed and overcome by a relentless current of people flowing in the opposite direction that I needed to travel. I had not foreseen this situation, or discussed it with Prisa. I turned my back on Independence Ave and decided that I would rather find safe harbor with Prisa, than venture further into the frigid, early morning waters of these unchartered seas. I walked past the gravel path to the Mall, and quickly began retracing my original route back to Prisa’s location. Speed was now essential. I theorized that Prisa and I must have found an accidental breach in the Mall security that allowed us earlier access to the Mall than our brethren on the south side of the capitol. This advantage would soon disappear, and with hordes of additional people entering the mall from the south, the harder it would be to find Prisa among the thousand bundled and huddled spectators. It would help if she was alerted to my change of plans, and looking for me as well. I pulled off my mittens, pulled out my cell phone, and pushed the speed dial number, praying that the signal would get through. The phone rang and rang, until an automated voice said that the contact was not available.

“Hi Pris, this is Dad” I said into the speaker. “I can’t find an access route to Independence and all the streets on the south side are jammed with people that will be flooding onto the mall. I have no clue how to get to Independence, so I’m heading back to your location. I hope you get this message so you can be on the lookout for me”. I tried to sound confident and matter-of-fact, but I was scared. I wasn’t sure if I could find the exact spot I had left her.

“Details, details; what were the details of that area?” I questioned myself, as I lengthened my stride. I mentally checked off the objects I remembered: strobe light, video screen, spotlight tower, and cardboard fencing and mats. I saw the strobe light in the distance, and re-positioned my returning glide path to the middle of the mall. I passed more and more people filling in previously open spaces as I descended toward the gleaming Capitol building. Praying that Prisa had not moved from her original location, I slowed down and triangulated with the strobe lighting and video screen on my left and the beacon tower on my right. With a sigh of relief I saw the cardboard fence around the quartet of friends in front of me, and quickly started searching for a familiar face and profile. I took three more steps and, looking down, I saw a bright blue knit cap, atop a huddled bundle on the grass. Prisa was sitting exactly where I had left her standing 20 minutes before.

“Hi Prisa”, I said with soulful relief. “I couldn’t get out; so I decided to come back”. I sat down next to her, huddled close for warmth, and explained what had happened.

“I’m glad your back” she said. “It was lonely without you”.

“I’m glad to be back. It would have been a sad morning without you”. Instead of feeling irritated or annoyed at the obstacles that had thwarted me, I was filled with a sense of peace. One thought kept going through my head, “Thank God I couldn’t get out”. I reached over, gave Prisa a one-armed hug, and settled down to our long, cold, morning watch together.
 

 

To be continued…..

 

 

dedalus_1947: (Default)

There are places I’ll remember

All my life, though some have changed.

Some forever, not for better,

Some have gone and some remain.

All these places have their moments,

With lovers and friends I still can recall.

Some are dead and some are living;

In my life, I’ve loved them all.

 (Lennon-McCarthy, In My Life: 1965)

I’ve found that most people my age recall their high school days in idyllic terms. I’ve never understood this. I mistakenly assumed that, in attending the same catholic school for four years, my high school friends and acquaintances shared the same adolescent feelings about these times. Yet, as I shivered at remembered scenes of embarrassments and humiliations, school mates and friends blissfully described these times as the best years of their lives. In the invitation of my silence, they tried to convince me of the superior education they received, the high quality of teaching, and the fulfilling social and sporting activities they participated in. At the conclusion of these conversations, I often doubted that we attended the same high school. These thoughts of high school came to me while I was writing my last essay about driving down Venice Boulevard (Rolling Home) and describing my years playing Pop Warner football. The high school scenes that came to mind did not fit the travelogue essay I was writing, so I saved them for another.

 

 

Looking back at the boy I was during high school, I would describe myself as an uncertain and insecure “nerd”, struggling to distinguish himself and achieve some chimerical prize in the social, academic, and athletic arenas in which we competed. I wanted to be recognized and envied: “There goes Tony. I wish I were as handsome, popular, smart, and athletic as he is”. At the same time I was afraid to be singled out, differentiated, or separated from the safety of a group. I wanted to be like other kids; kids who looked the right way, did the right things, and knew what to say in all occasions. It was a confusing time. My day to day existence never ceased being a private struggle of making mistakes, forgiving myself for having made them, and then trying to avoid making them again. This was difficult to do because I kept them hidden and secret. Miraculously, by a confluence of accident, good luck, and hard work, I reached a truce with myself in my senior year. In that fourth year, I achieved a modicum of individual distinction, group acceptance, and personal satisfaction as a student and athlete – but I could never forget my lower-classmen days, especially my freshman year and football.
 

 

In the summer of 1961, I decided to skip freshman tryouts and remain for a final year in the Pop Warner football program. I was in the odd situation of being the only high school boy on my team, since everyone else went to public junior high schools. The core of the team had been together for three years. We were veteran and experienced ball players who knew that this could be our championship season. I had no interest in breaking ranks with my comrades to join a new team. I assumed any sportsman would understand this decision; especially since football was just a game. Unfortunately, my high school did not. In my freshman year, I learned two lessons about high school football: Team loyalties are not respected when they conflict with its football program; and football is not a game in high school.
 

 

A clue to the importance of football in high school was the tradition among upper classmen in lettermen sweaters of cornering freshman boys and asking if they were going out for football. The question was couched as a compliment, such as “You have great hands; are you going out for the frosh team?” Or, “With your size and strength, you’d make a great lineman; are you going out for football?” The “right” answer was “Sure, I can’t wait!” This response, with an added dose of naive enthusiasm, would get you past this roadblock. Answering “No” was a sure provocation to a hostile interrogation, laced with humiliating homophobic insults and innuendo. “What’s wrong with you, are you a pansy? Do you still play with dolls? You don’t look like a fag to me!” Coaches who taught freshmen classes also posed these question, albeit without the explicit homosexual references. I’d been forewarned of this fall ritual by one former teammate who had moved on to catholic high school. However, it didn’t help, and I mistakenly tried walking the tightrope of honesty and sport machismo. When I was “braced” by lettermen or teachers, I told them I WAS a football player, but I was passing on freshman ball to complete a third year in Pop Warner. Instead of understanding and respect for this loyalty to my team, I received a semester-length dose of negative attention for my choice. It was the worst possible fate for a freshman, in a new school among strangers, to be singled out and made the target of mockery and derision by “jock” teachers and lettermen. I was called a “Pop Warner pansy”, a “homo”, and a “traitor” in hallways and the lunch area. I had to run more laps, and do extra push-ups and sit-ups than my fellow freshmen in P.E. This treatment continued until I showed up for spring football in April.

 

Spring football is a gathering of novice and veteran football players so they can be inspected and judged for their ability to play junior varsity or varsity football. The coaches hoped to weed out the weak and uncover the strong. At first I thought I had something to prove: I would demonstrate my seasoned skills and fierce attitude; I would show that I was not a “faggot” and I could play this game. Since I had not gone out for the freshman team that fall, I was relegated to the beginners group until I showed my mettle. I took the setback in stride. I devoted the first days to showing the neophytes how to buckle their pads and wear their uniforms, and translating the gridiron curses that were screamed at them by volunteer upperclassmen coaches. The adult coaches talked about team spirit, courage, and commitment; but, after three years, I knew that at its essence, football was about guts, attitude, and rules. There were rules of behavior and etiquette on the field and off the field. Beginners practiced and improved their skills, but real players had to show a willingness to accept and deliver punishment and receive pain without hesitation or sign of distress. I had done this for three years, and I believed I could continue at the high school level.

 

On one particularly cold day of practice, the linemen paired off for tackling drills. I was facing a mountainous classmate named Alex Schumacher, a freshman beginner who was nicknamed “Big”. He was 6’- 1’’, and weighed about 210 lbs – hefty advantages to my 5-9, 160. We were 5 yards apart when he was given the ball and commanded to run forward. My job was to hit and stop him, lifting and driving him off his feet, back into the ground. The collision was sufficiently loud and thunderous to cause all eyes on the field to turn towards us; but instead of seeing me drive him up and onto his back, the coaches saw us collapse to the side. An unstoppable force had struck the unmovable object, and there was no momentum left. Grasping the instructional opportunity of this moment, an assistant coach ran up to us and yelled in my face. It was a two-man litany I was familiar with:

“Delgado, do you call that sissy effort a tackle?” He screamed.

“No sir” I yelled back, through my mouth piece.

“What do you want to do about it? He barked.

“I want to do it again, coach!” I yelled enthusiastically.

“Good, line up! Do it again! Only this time plant him into the ground.” He commanded.

Schumacher was on his feet, still holding the ball, and moving his helmeted head from side to side as we spoke. He never said a word. He had no lines in this scripted dialogue, so he just stood there, confused, waiting for directions. “What are you waiting for, Shumacher?” the coached yelled, turning toward him and taking the ball away. “You heard me, let’s do it again. Line up – only this time I want you to run over him”.

We separated again. I took my stance, bit down on my mouth piece, and leaned forward, visualized my action. Spring forward, with driving legs, and impaling my right shoulder into his thighs, while wrapping my arms around his knees, pull them back towards me. The keys to a successful tackle off the line are hitting the ball carrier low and maintaining forward momentum by driving your legs like pistons. I’d done this hundreds of times. By putting all the pieces together I would hit him, drive him back, and drop him down.  Unfortunately, I knew what all the coaches knew, and the watching veterans suspected, about this pairing – it was a mismatch. Halfbacks and fullbacks did not come in Schumacher’s size, bulk or weight. My only hope was to act confidently and decisively and pray that Schumacher would realize that he needed to let himself be tackled. However, Alex was new to football. He truly believed it was his job to run over me. He knew nothing of lineman etiquette during tackling drills. The purpose of the drill was to practice form and intensity, not to score touchdowns. I was demonstrating the proper bravado and determination; he was supposed to be the tackling dummy.

“Go!” The coach screamed as he jammed the football into Schumacher’s stomach.

I charged off my mark, staying low and staring at the target of his stomach. I hit him with a resounding crunch before he had taken 2 steps, and followed the impact with a long strenuous grunt, “Aarrgghhh!”
 


 

Silence ensued, as all eyes watched the mammoth Schumacher, absorb the blow. My shoulder and helmet appeared to be pasted on his waist and thighs, and my legs kept driving, but there was no movement. I finally yanked the arms encircling his legs toward me and twisted him to the side, as though I was wrestling a giant heifer to the ground.

The coach was instantly hovering over us, yelling: “What do you call that, Delgado?”

“A candy-ass tackle, coach,” I replied immediately, looking up at him from the ground. I was hoping that by giving him an honest but humorous response, he would laugh and move on to the next pair. But he wasn’t going to let me off the hook yet.

“Damn right”, he responded. “That was the sorriest, most candy-assed tackle, I’ve ever seen! Where did you learn how to tackle like that? Oh wait, now I remember, Pop Warner football. What do you want to do about this, Delgado? Do you want to quit?”

“No sir!” I yelled back at him at the top of my lungs. “I want to go again, coach!” I lied, hoping that the force of my words would sound convincing. It must have worked, because for the first time I saw what appeared to be the beginnings of a smile on his grizzled face. I hoped he was seeing the absurdity of my situation, the size of my opponent, and realizing that I was only demonstrating false bravado.

“Good, then line up and knock him on his ass!”

That was not the response I wanted to hear. Perhaps my acting was better that I thought. Now I had no recourse but to try one more time. Since Alex was not cooperating with me, I needed a new plan. I jogged back to the line of tacklers and took my three point stance. If I couldn’t drive him back, then I had to drop him. The only way to do that was to knock his feet out from under him. This was the last-ditch, failsafe maneuver performed by undersized safeties when facing hard-charging fullbacks who had broken through the defensive lines of linemen and linebackers. It was a risky maneuver, because by launching oneself at a ball carrier’s feet, and turning themselves into a low-flying missile, with their helmet as the warhead, the tackler lost sight of his target. A quick back could simply leap over the blind, low flying obstacle and make the tackler look foolish. No self-respecting lineman would try such a ploy, leaving it for the likes of safeties, punters, and kickers. I had seen it done, but I never practiced the maneuver. I kept telling myself that Schumacher did not know enough to leap over me.

“Go” shouted the coach, pushing the ball into Schumacher’s stomach for the third time.

I flew off my mark, tunneling all my attention at the space between his ankles and knees. On my third step I launched myself, lowering my eyes to the ground, and visualizing the contact of my helmet and shoulder pads against bone and sinew. I felt a jarring collision that shivered through my neck, shoulders, back, waist, and thighs. I felt a wide blow to the stomach, followed by the collapsing avalanche of a mountain on my back. Everything went black until someone rolled me over.

“He’s not breathing, he’s not breathing!” Schumacher was yelling frantically in my face, and looking around in panic.

I was trying to inhale, but my lungs and mouth found no traction. I was grasping for air in an airless vacuum, and everyone moved and sounded as though they were under water. The wind had been knocked out of me. I’d seen it happen a few times in practices, and I’d experienced it once – I think. I wasn’t sure, and I didn’t care, because I couldn’t breathe. I tried saying “Pull up my belt; pull me up by my belt!” but no sounds emanated except more gasping. I’d seen coaches and other players treat this condition by lifting the belt of the winded player and raising his stomach. This action allowed air back into the diaphragm and lungs. However, no one was moving toward me and I was beginning to panic. Finally the head of the coach appeared in front of me, and I felt my midsection being raised up. “Whoosh”, the air seemed to rush back into me, and I started breathing again.

“Are you okay, Delgado?” The coach asked, staring into my eyes.

“Yes, sir”, I replied, marveling at how good air tasted after being blown out of your body. I sat up and felt my body expanding and contracting with air.

“Take five and get some water”, he said, patting me on my helmet.

“Do you want me to try it again, coach?” I asked, praying that he would finally call a halt to this ludicrous game we were playing.

“No”, he said, grimly, patting my helmet again. “I think you’ve done enough for now. Go get some water”.

I got up slowly and removed my helmet as I went jogging off to the water fountain. My stomach was sore, so I just rinsed my mouth and spit out the water. I was more interested in deep gulps of air than water. Two minutes later Schumacher came lumbering up to the fountain.

“I’m sorry, Tony”, he said through the face guard of his helmet.

“Shut up, you asshole” I muttered, softly, making sure no coaches heard. “Thanks for trying to kill me”, I exaggerated for good measure.

“Jeez” he whined. “I was only following directions. I didn’t mean to hurt you”.

“It’s a tackling DRILL you idiot!” I said, accentuating every word. “You’re not supposed to score touchdowns. You’re supposed to hold the ball and be tackled”.

“I’m sorry”, he repeated soulfully.

“Come on”, I said, putting my helmet back on. “Let’s get back to practice”. As we jogged along, I shook my head from side to side, in dreaded anticipation. Was I the only person who saw the absurdity of the drill and its mismatch? The tackling episode had been filled with potential for levity and humor, but the coach treated it as a tragedy of some sort. I was in the middle of a slapstick comedy sketch, but nobody was laughing. I couldn’t because my stomach was too sore, and no one else seemed to get it.

 

When Schumacher and I returned to our section of the practice field, the coach was directing the linemen to form a wide circle around him.

“Okay, okay, okay” he said, clapping his hands together in rhythm with his exclamations. “The drill is called ‘Bull in the Ring’. You each have a number. We start with one man in the middle, whose job it is to stay there as long as possible. The object is to knock the man out of the ring. I call a number, and the man with that number charges and drives the bull out of the ring. Get it? Who’ll go first?”

Even as I stepped forward with raised arm, shouting “Here coach!” the self-accusations reverberated in my mind: “What are you doing? Are you crazy? What are you trying to prove?” It was too late.

“Delgado, great; I knew I could count on you. Get in the middle of the ring, and be alert and ready”.

I ran to the center of the circle and took a wide, crouching stance, with arms up and out, and legs driving into the ground. It was a stupid drill whose only purpose was to demonstrate toughness and determination. Some coaches called it an open-field blocking drill, claiming it increased alertness and reaction time. I’d come to the conclusion that it was simply another game, a test of strength, fatigue, and spirit. I figured I could use my experience and balance, as well as my strength, to stay in the ring for a decent length of time.

“Five” shouted the coach, and Cavanaugh, a tall end came charging at me. He ran upright, so I slipped under his arms and slammed my shoulder into his chest and stomach, keeping my legs driving. “Eleven”, and the next player sprang at me. On and on the random countdown continued, and with each new opponent I managed to stay balanced and low, matching blow for blow, and push for push. I think I survived seven or eight attackers when my shoulders, arms, and legs began to ache and my reactions became labored. I wasn’t popping my pads into the on-rushing chests with enthusiasm, and my movements slowed. I was weakening, and it would only be a matter of time before I was pushed out; but I wasn’t ready to give up yet. When Number 3 came careening at me like a runaway locomotive, I stepped aside and shoved him in the same direction he was moving. His momentum sent him crashing to the ground, and triggered a verbal firestorm from the coach.

“What the hell are you doing, Delgado!” he screamed, running up to my position in the middle of the ring.

“I’m staying in the ring, coach” I replied, with more conviction than I felt.

“That’s not staying in the ring, Delgado – that’s chicken shit. You’re supposed to pound him out of the ring or be pounded out. You can’t be dancing around my ring. You’re not a ballerina, and I don’t want any candy-assed chickens in my ring!”

Perhaps it was the implausibility of a candy-assed hen that sent me over the edge. I again imagined I was back in that absurdist sketch on the tackling field, only this time I wasn’t accepting his humorless line of thinking.

“I thought I was on defense, sir”, I stated defiantly. “So I used my hands”.

“You what?” he exploded, his face turning into a rich tomato color. “You thought you were on defense? Are you being a smart-ass? Who told you to think? I don’t want you thinking on my field; I want you following orders and showing me some guts”.

“Sorry, coach” I dead-panned. “I thought I was on defense”. I wasn’t admitting my error, and I wasn’t giving him any new openings. I certainly wasn’t volunteering to repeat the drill. I’d already managed to knock the wind out of myself once and I had no intention of doing it again; but I never expected his response.

“You quit, and I can’t stand quitters” he shouted hysterically, grabbing hold of my face mask. “Get out of my sight, Delgado. You make me sick. Take five laps, and then pack up your Pop Warner, smart-ass attitude and hit the showers. You’re done for the day. Get out of here. I don’t want to see you”.

 

During those laps around the field, I subjected that coach to every hellish torture and degradation a 14 year old could imagine. I called him every curse word I knew, and muttered every obscenity I could think of with each crunching step. By the time I reached the locker room I was finally under control, and during the shower I considered quitting. With water dripping over my head and shoulders I came to the sad realization that this was not the way I learned to play the game. There was no laughter or levity during these practices; there were no encouragements or gentle prodding. I’d entered the new dimension of high school football, and I’d entered it late, with a reputation for having chosen Pop Warner football over freshman ball. These coaches were attempting to tear down the players and then build them up; and I was being too analytical, too critical, and too judgmental. I didn't belong here. I heard the clattering of cleats against cement before the rest of the players joined me in the locker room. No one directed a word to me. Although I sat in classes with many of these players, we were still virtual strangers. I had crossed a line of some kind on the practice field, and they were afraid that contact with me might contaminate them. I was alone and afraid to tell anyone what had happened.
 

 

Loneliness is a strange sensation when one is surrounded by two parents, two brothers, and two sisters, and crowded into a modified two-bedroom, one-bathroom home; but during my adolescence I felt it the most. No one seemed to know what I was experiencing in a co-institutional (girls attended the same high school, but they were educated in separate classes, by lay women or sisters) catholic high school as a freshmen. I was given no forewarning of, or frame of reference for the conflicts I was encountering. No one gave me the advice and warnings I offered my younger siblings when they entered grade school, high school, or college. That night I managed to bury and repress all thoughts of practice as I watched television. I actually welcomed the distracting aching muscles and fatigue I felt. I slept an exhausted and dreamless sleep, and awoke determined to quit. The rest of my day in classes was spent contriving the rationale I would offer to my coaches and parents for this decision. At 3:25 that afternoon, carrying my helmet, pads, and uniform over my shoulder, I walked silently to the block house that acted as our locker room. I told the head coach that I had spoken with my parents and they wanted me to devote more attention to my class work and grades. I don’t know if I was convincing, or if he had already decided that I wasn’t worth the effort, but he did not try to change my mind. He accepted my gear and wished me luck. That night I lied to my father and said that the demands of spring football were aversely affecting my class work, homework and grades. I told him that I needed to quit and concentrate on my course work. It was an argument that he could not, and did not, argue with. I sealed my fate that freshman year, and my football career came to an end.

dedalus_1947: (Default)

How does it feel?

How does it feel?

To be on your own,

With no direction home,

Like a complete unknown.

Like a rolling stone?

(Like a Rolling Stone, Bob Dylan: 1965)

 

When I saw the familiar exit sign on Interstate 405, I knew a decision had to be made. “Which way do I turn at the end of the off ramp?” I thought. I was driving to the December meeting of the Middle School Principal’s Organization (MSPO) of the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD). The meeting was to be held at Mark Twain Middle School. This was the public school which was attended by most of the kids I played baseball and football with as a child. I’ve traveled this road hundreds of times in my life: practicing freeway driving with my dad in 1964; driving home from classes at UCLA in 1967; and driving home from work on the swing shift at ADT Alarm Company, in 1971. After all those years, one would think that this was an easy question to answer, no? No; in fact it is a conundrum of Dylanesque proportions (Bob, not Thomas). This crossroad of Sawtelle Boulevard and the 405 exit always challenged me to find the best direction home. Turning left, puts me on Washington Place, which (when followed westward) takes me directly to my mother’s home. Turning right places me on a street, which (while a little out of the way) is a more historic route. While I usually took the quicker and more familiar course home, on this occasion I turned right. I decided to treat myself to a nostalgic journey down the boulevard named after the beach community where I lived from childhood through adulthood - Venice, California.
 

 

Today, Venice Boulevard is an expansive, four-lane, double highway that runs from Figueroa Street in Los Angeles to Pacific Avenue in Venice. I first traveled this road in 1959 when my father drove the entire family to see his new work place, and the house we hoped to buy in Culver City. At that time, the boulevard was a narrow, two-lane street, separated by a wide expanse of abandoned railroad track running in between. My father reanimated those tracks with stories about how he and his two younger brothers rode the trolleys of the Pacific Electric Railway to the beach. He called it the Red Car, and it was part of the legendary electric train system that operated in Southern California during the first half of the 20th Century. The line started in South Los Angeles and ended in the city of Venice (which was later incorporated into Los Angeles), with its famous promenade, beach, pier, and huge, indoor, saltwater swimming pool. In between these terminal points, the route traveled through the communities of Culver City, Palms, and Mar Vista. Culver City was the most prominent stop.
 

 

Home of three major studios, Metro Goldwyn Mayer (MGM), Hal Roach, and Radio-Keith-Orpheum (RKO); Culver City was the mecca of the Hollywood film, movie, and television industry from the early 1900’s to the 70’s. While MGM, with its impressive, overhead billboard of a roaring lion, was certainly the largest studio, RKO was the most storied. The studio produced such movie classics as King Kong and Citizen Kane, and it had a series of notorious and memorable owners. Joseph Kennedy, Howard Hughes, and David O. Selznick, owned and operated this studio. In 1957, RKO was purchased by Lucille Ball and Desi Arnez (stars of I Love Lucy), and renamed Desilu Studios. It was finally sold to Paramount Television Studios in 1967. Until our move to the Westside, I assumed that movies and television shows were produced only in Hollywood. I couldn’t believe that I would soon be living so close to this magical industry and the stars that worked there. As time went on, despite my pretended indifference to the celebrity star system, I never lost the habit of rubber-necking whenever I drove by the studios in Culver City. I was convinced that all the stars who worked there, also walked to work, strolled along the streets, and frequented the shops, restaurants, and churches of that city. Unfortunately, despite all my years of looking, I think I only saw the back of David McCallum’s head (He was the co-star of the popular 60’s television series, The Man from U.N.C.L.E.).
 

 

My knowledge of this street really started at my father’s workplace. He was a photographer at Mauri-Bardovi Photography, a commercial studio on Venice Blvd, just south of Cattaraugus Ave (I remember the street because I mispronounced it “cataracts”, ignoring the sound of the fourth vowel in favor of an ocular disease that rolled off my tongue). He worked there for nine years, eventually becoming the manager after the death of the owner and founder. His first duties were general photography and detailing (or “opaquing”) negatives. This intricate, doctoring of negatives, allowed only the non-opaque parts of a negative to develop and print. I still remember walking through that building on my first visit. The brand new, state-of-the-art studio seemed to be an unwinding honeycomb of workstations, darkrooms, printing labs, drying rooms, and large, open spaces. These open areas were cluttered with lights, stands, partitions, cables, tripods, and cameras. To an eleven year old novice, the studio was a disorienting maze of darkness and light as I walked from room to room, and lab to lab. It was scary and wondrous at the same time.

 

When I accompanied him as a helper, my father would disappear into a dark room with rolls of encased camera film and, guided by eerie red illumination, reappear in minutes with dripping spirals of unwound negatives. The unspooled rolls were then hung up like long, narrow socks on clothes lines in a walk-in cabinet. Once dry, the next step of the process was the most elaborate and creative. My father took the dry negatives into a wet lab to “print” and develop the photos. In those black and white days, images were projected and “imprinted” through light onto chemically treated photographic paper. By hand, these prints were then passed along and submerged in a series of flat chemical tubs until the pictorial images materialized and were locked in place. Until my initiation into this process, I thought photography consisted of posing or staging the subjects you wished to record, and snapping the shutter. I believed that the creative use of light and shadow was at the beginning of the photographic sequence, never imagining that the true masters of this artistic medium also manipulated them at the end. My father’s real skill as a photographer was demonstrated after the rolls of negative film were dry. He would use them to produce quick “contact proofs”. He studied these temporary prints to find the best negatives and determine the timing and lighting needed to produce the right picture. It was my job (as his eldest born helper) to dry the prints. So I would carefully lay the chemically treated photos onto a wide canvas conveyor belt that moved around a huge warming drum. They emerged, crisp and glossy at the other end of the conveyor, ready to be stacked and boxed. When I wasn’t bored or sleepy, I marveled at the simplicity of a black and white palette and the fine photos my father could produce by his attention to detail.
 

 

Just down the street from my father’s studio, heading west on Venice, near National Blvd, was another famous locale. My siblings and I recognized it immediately when we first drove past. We had already been branded by its distinctive Olympic trademark label and trucks. The Helms Bakery, and its fleet of open-cabbed bakery trucks, with their distinctive nautical whistles, was the pastry pied-piper of our time. To children in the late 50’s and early 60’s, the cookies, cakes, and doughnuts of the Helmsman made him the equal to the Good Humor Ice Cream Man. Mothers also appreciated this service because the Helmsman provided convenient staples that every kitchen needed. It was a rare confluence of interest which did not survive the increasing number of family automobiles and the swelling expansion of large, neighborhood supermarkets. Helms was already reducing its fleet and collapsing routes when we moved into Venice. Soon after, the trucks stopped rolling and the bakery closed. For years the last remaining symbols of the company were the bronze statue of The Helmsman at the Wheel, which was across the street from the Helms Olympic Foundation, and the original trademark Helms Olympic chevron sign atop the old bakery on Venice Blvd. The sign and foundation are still there, but the sculpture was moved to Chace Park in the Marina del Rey. The original bakery was converted into a huge furniture warehouse and showroom, and another section was turned into a jazz club called The Jazz Bakery which still operates.
 

 

Down from Helms Bakery is the intersection of Venice and Sepulveda Blvd. Sepulveda is the longest street in the city and county of Los Angeles. It runs an impressive 42.8 miles from Rinaldi Ave in the northern end of the San Fernando Valley to the city limits of Hermosa Beach. For the purposes of this story, it marked the boundary between Culver City and Palms, and led to the house we never bought. I don’t remember much of the house, other than it being yellow and immediately opposite the freeway. I do recall that it was located near Tito’s Tacos, a small, walk-up Mexican restaurant, on the corner of Washington Place and Sepulveda. Whenever I passed this taco stand, I saw long, serpentine lines of men and women waiting to purchase their simple fare of tacos, tostadas, burritos, tortilla chips and salsa. The only comparable sight was Tommy’s Original World Famous Hamburger stand, on Beverly Blvd in Los Angeles. The long lines at Tito’s Tacos continue to this day, and despite this visual testimony to its popularity, I never ate there. I probably would have, if we had moved nearby. However, when the bank determined that our house’s location was too close to an expanding freeway, the sale fell through. Soon after, my parents found a new house in Venice, and we bought it.

 


 

I always considered the 405 Interstate the border line of “The Westside”. Every thing west of the San Diego Freeway was the official “Westside”, and all the communities to the East were not (despite their proximity to the freeway). I’m sure citizen of Culver City, Palms, Cheviot Hills, Westwood, Fox Hills, and Inglewood would challenge this assertion, but they’d be wrong. The east-west divide occurs at the 405. Everything changes when you cross the freeway, traveling toward the beach – the weather, the residences, the people, and the traffic. Just as you can feel and see the thermometer change when you drive through the Sepulveda Pass from the San Fernando Valley into West Los Angeles at Mulholland Drive; you experience the same sensation when crossing the 405. The cold, wet, marine layer overcast, which is a common feature of beach life, rarely extends past the San Diego Freeway, and people dress, act, and look different on the eastside. I’ve also noticed that first-time visitors to these beaches exclaimed that they could smell the ocean after they crossed the 405.

 

As I traveled westward on Venice Boulevard, every street I passed, from Sawtelle Blvd to Walgrove Ave, was a virtual portal to memories of the past. Each road led to stories, people, and experiences that affected me and shaped my life. McLaughlin Ave was the route I took to UCLA when I commuted by motor scooter as an undergrad, and on bicycle as a graduate student. I would drive the family car when it was available, but with 3 and then 4 siblings attending the same college at different hours of the day, and with different courses, it was never convenient. We depended on personal means of transportation. The Santa Monica “Big Blue Bus” was the best option, but it took a long and circuitous course to the university. I preferred a solitary method because I could set my own schedules and explore new neighborhoods and routes whenever the notion struck me. When I took my scooter or bike, I always chose the flattest route to Westwood. I avoided the “Sawtelle Hill” by riding around it on Palms Blvd, then connecting with Sawtelle, and taking that street all the way to Ohio Ave in Brentwood. Ohio Ave was the southern border of the Federal property that contained the Veterans Administration complex, the Medical Center, the Federal Building, and the National Cemetery. Ohio took me to Veterans Ave in Westwood; and that street led me to Westwood Village and UCLA. Most days, I enjoyed the long commute in the fresh clean air, because it cleared my mind and gave me time to think about things. I also became familiar with the local sights, neighborhoods, and communities of the Westside: the Nisei (second generation Japanese-American) community along Sawtelle in Palms, the used book stores on Santa Monica Blvd, and the variety of theatres, shops, and restaurants in the Village. Centinela Avenue in Mar Vista was another such portal.

Whenever I cross Centinela on Venice Blvd, I always look toward the southeast corner of the intersection to see the remnants of Bruno’s Ristorante, the Italian restaurant that stood there from 1969 to 2000. The original building still stands, along with its HUGE billboard sign; but it now houses a Christian enterprise called The Vineyard Christian Fellowship. Bruno’s was the first “real” restaurant we dined at as a family of eight (6 children and 2 adults). Prior to that occasion, we only visited “family diners” such as Norm’s or Denney’s. These were convenient places, but I couldn’t shake the idea that they weren’t very classy, and one shouldn’t take a serious girl friend to dinner there. Bruno’s, on the other hand, presented a readable and moderately priced menu, with the upscale décor of a welcoming Venetian palazzo. I always felt comfortable and secure there, and took girls I liked and wanted to impress on dates. It was one of the first restaurants I took my wife Kathy when we began dating. Centinela also served as our backdoor route to Santa Monica. If we wanted to avoid the traffic and congestion of Lincoln Blvd when driving to that city, Centinela was the better path to take. The most graphic memory I have of that route is when I drove my father to the Santa Monica Airport to recover the studio car. This was the day his boss died in a helicopter accident. He had been scouting aerial sites for a photo shoot when the engine failed. Miraculously, the pilot avoided hitting any pedestrians, cars, or spectators, when the helicopter lost power and crashed. The pilot and my Dad’s friend and boss died on a street in Palms. Once my father answered my questions about the crash, he remained silent for the remainder of the trip to the airport.
 

 

Mar Vista was an apartment haven for young people and college students in the 1960’s and 70’s. It’s affordable, single and double room residences attracted large numbers of UCLA, Mount Saint Mary’s, and Santa Monica College students, who couldn’t afford the higher rents of Santa Monica, Brentwood, and Westwood. Despite my geographical proximity to Mar Vista, I actually spent more time with friends in the South Bay area, and the cities of Manhattan, Hermosa, and Redondo Beach. The South Bay tended to attract students from Loyola, Marymount University, and El Camino College. My high school friends (see Tres Amigos) lived in Hermosa Beach. A friend’s apartment offered the perfect counter-balance to college, home, and life (especially if one still lived at home with his family, like I did). Once or twice a week, I would drop by Jim, Greg, and Wayne’s, or John’s apartment to talk, play cards, listen to music, and share the problems of school and home. The addition of beer, wine, and food would escalate these innocuous visits to a higher level. Given the right circumstances and motivations, these spontaneous visits could generate viral invitations to more friends and soon an all-night party ensued. Those youthful days seemed endless. As time passed, and prices rose, however, many of these apartments on the Westside and South Bay were eventually converted into condominiums and sold off to older, permanent residents. If I took Wade Street at Venice and traveled south for a mile or so, I would arrive at Mitchell Ave. My brother Eddie had his first apartment on that street, and when he bought a nearby condo, my youngest brother Alex joined him as a roommate for awhile. My sister Gracie even rented an apartment nearby, before she moved to San Francisco. A little further south from Wade on Venice Blvd, I arrived at the jewel of the boulevard, Venice High School.

 

The permanent image I have of Venice High School is of manor-like grounds, with lush, green grass, beautiful gardens, and towering, gleaming white, Art Deco buildings. The focal point of this picture was a dramatically posed sculpture of a woman, pointing skyward. The scantily clad statue rose above two crouching figures and was positioned in the middle of a rose garden, between a double walkway, that traveled from the sidewalk to the Main Building. It was a captivating sight, which raised my opinion of the design and planning that went into the school construction of that age. I later learned that the sculpture was of Myrna Loy, a famous motion picture star of the 30’s and 40’s, who attended Venice High in the 1920’s. The school was first established in 1911. In those days it was called Venice Union Polytechnic High School. The original buildings were severely damaged in the Long Beach earthquake of 1933. The Art Deco style was used in the reconstructed school that we see today.

 


 

I never attended Venice High School, but I became intimately familiar with its grounds, athletic fields, and football stadium. For three seasons, from 1960 to 1962, I played Pop Warner Football at Venice High School. We practiced three to five days a week on the small eastside playing field, and we played on Saturdays in the football stadium. It was the site of my training and initiation into a ritual sport that I grew to love, play, and leave behind. When I went out for football, I knew absolutely nothing about it. I was aware that my father played football in junior college, because I’d found an old photograph of him in pads and uniform. We also watched some of the early NFL games on television; but that was all. I’d learned the rudiments of baseball by playing on the streets and playgrounds of Los Angeles. By the time I joined a Little League baseball team in Venice, I was 12 years old, with unrefined skills, and many bad fielding habits. However, when I signed up for Pop Warner football, I committed to learning a sport from the ground up, under the tutelage of knowledgeable and dedicated teachers and coaches. The Venice Athletic Association, the sponsoring organization, was a mature version of Little League. Players were made responsible for equipment, playbooks, and practices, and they addressed all adults as “Sir” and coaches as “Mr.” or “Coach” (we had been on a first name basis in Little League). My football coaches were the first teachers to illustrate the principle that football skills such as blocking, tackling, catching, passing, and scrimmaging had to be learned correctly. Skills could only be mastered by meticulous discipline, attention to detail, and practice; practice, practice, practice. Games were the easy part; they were the reward after 5 grueling days of exercise, drills, and scrimmages. I discovered that playing the game well was not about individual talent; it was about practice and working as a team. The benefit of playing on the same team, with the same players, and consistent coaching for 3 years was physical, intellectual, and technical improvement that I could witness and experience. The first time I was sent into a game for a series of plays was a blur of lights, bodies, huddles, and collisions. Players spoke in garbled words that I could not comprehend, and everything moved too fast, except me. I was stuck in quicksand with a filmy bag over my head. After my first series of downs I returned to the safety and calmness of the bench, and stayed there when the offensive unit returned to the field. I did not realize that I was supposed to stay in the game until THE COACH took me out. Three years later, as co-captain of the defensive unit, each down was a slow, elongated interval between actions which allowed me time to analyze and reflect. Each play flowed as if it was in slow motion, giving me time to think, react, and recover.

 


 

The corner of Venice Blvd and Walgrove Avenue was my final milestone. It marked the northwest boundary of Venice High School, and signaled a change of direction from my westerly migration. I turned right and headed north on Walgrove. This would be my first visit to Mark Twain Junior High in over 45 years. I’d passed it countless times in my youth. This was a familiar path because I had taken it many times when a football practice or scrimmage was held at Penmar Playground, in North Venice. On those occasions, the players who weren’t driven by their parents, would meet at the high school and then ride their bikes up Walgrove Ave to Lake St. Along the way, we’d pass Mark Twain, with its distinctive mural entrance. It was the school all my Pop Warner teammates attended before they matriculated to their respective high schools as 10th graders. Playing football for three years with public school students had been an educational experience for me. These boys took courses and talked about subjects that didn’t exist in my school. They dressed for P.E., showered in locker rooms, and took shop classes. They also used more colorful and expressive words when cursing and swearing. I don’t recall any racial or pejorative name calling and put-downs, but I do remember anger, with some pushing and shoving. We were experiencing many new feelings and emotions in those days. Playing on the same team for three years had taught us to deal with anger, successes, and failure. The contact nature of football, with its strict rules, transcending folklore, and rigid penalties, allowed a fair and physical means of resolving disputes, and expressing joy and despair. We would practice during the week, play a game on Saturday, and then, win or lose, get on with the rest of our lives at school, home, or play. Football was a sport that was sensible, balanced, and enjoyable, and the coaches and boosters of the Pop Warner program emphasized and practiced those values.

 


 

I drove past the front of Mark Twain Middle School on Walgrove and turned right on Victoria Ave. The street took me to the P.E. field on the north side of campus, and the parking that had been reserved for member of the visiting organization. I was curious to see what the school actually looked like from the inside. As I walked through the hallways and along the outdoor arcades, I though of my old teammates and the game we played. I was struck by a thought about endings. My playing days ended with Pop Warner football on the fields of Venice High, while most of my teammates continued playing at their respective schools. Our lives divided, like intersecting highways, and I never saw them again.

dedalus_1947: (Default)

Be thankful for your blessings all,
and the happy memories we recall.
For times we spent in winter and fall,
before our children grew wise and tall.

I think it was their tall symmetry that first caught my attention. Once I noticed them, I couldn’t stop my fascination with the balanced perspective and narrative unease they started in me. The angular tableaux presented so many mysteries and questions that my gaze kept returning to it.

 

I was sitting in a bookstore café and reading room on the day after Thanksgiving. The room was steeped in dark earth colors with one beige wall reflecting the light that washed in through a row of windows. The wooden furniture was solid and simple. A series of straight-lined, mahogany colored coffee tables with high-backed chairs bordered the glassed-in wall. The room had the air of a college library, with more tables and chairs filling the center of the room, and one taller, circular table with 4 highchairs at the far end. A coffee bar with two servers lay just beyond this stilted perch. At first I took no notice of anything unusual. Then a series of visual images began intruding into my reading and writing:

  • The straight lines of the high chair melded into long angles of the jean pedal-pusher slacks and legs.
  • Amber-framed, horn-rimmed glasses tilted at a 45º slant, on a head of tightly braided strands of black hair.
  • Elongated upper arms were hidden under an emerald colored, diamond-shaped poncho sweater which covered the angular shoulders, and reached past the mid-section of her long waist.
  • Bony elbows, followed by long, slender arms, hands and fingers extended from the knitted fabric, holding a sheet of white paper.
  • A shorter, mirror image, in white sweatshirt and pale jeans, sat at the accompanying chair, her feet dangling down, without reaching the floor.
  • The smaller companion moved skittishly around the table and chairs.
  • The taller girl was slim, slender, and solemn.
  • She sat and stood ramrod straight and still, with long legs and lean arms, and ignored the little girl by her side.

 They were two young, black girls, sitting in tall, bar-like, high chairs in the reading room of Borders Book Store. They were about 10 and 7 years of age, and their stilted, circular table was strewn with rectangular binders, notebooks, and workbooks. The older of the girls stood about 5’-9”, and was most seriously intense in her work. She sat erect, holding a sheet of paper in one hand. A long arm and elbow formed a perfect right angle with her body as she held her work in a slender hand with tapered fingers. Lean and long, she presented a queenly pose as she studied the paper through amber-colored, horn-rimmed eye glasses. Her swan-like neck was motionless as she mouthed the written words to herself; and her tightly-braided hair formed a delicate design of black lace, pulled closely around her head. Her younger sister did not use glasses, and wore different color slacks. She was a smaller, colt-like, kinetic version of her sober sister. Frozen in this eternal moment of infinite possibility, the older sibling looked like an aloof, ebony princess, with no intention of recognizing her sister. Their mother sat off to the side, away from the smaller child’s occasional antics and whisperings. She too was surrounded by papers, textbooks, and notebooks. She would periodically look away from the page and the paragraphs she was highlighting in yellow and inspect the actions of these two, younger versions of herself. What was she thinking as she gazed upon the unlimited futures of her children? What were her personal circumstances? Was she a graduate student? Were those law books in front of her, or accounting books? Was she married, single, or divorced?
 

 

I pulled back from the unfolding diorama before me, when I realized I was filling in the narrative gaps with struggles and conflicts I was inventing. I’d gone from fact to fiction in only a few brief glimpses of these three individuals, with no basis in reality. These girls were total strangers, and I was jumping to dramatic conclusions based on little evidence or clues. Yet there was something hauntingly familiar about this scene. They reminded me of a tableau I had witnessed on many occasions in another lifetime. The characters, sex, and ethnicity were different, but their relationship was the same. In that life, so long ago, I too would secretly watch a tall and skinny boy, deep in concentrated study, with a smaller sister by his side. He would have been about the same angular height and width as the solemn ebony princess, and he would have ignored his younger sibling in the same stern manner. In those days, I would not know what to imagine as I watched them standing, sitting, and moving, when they accompanied me to a library or bookstore. I could not visualize a future for them in those days, because to do so imposed an artificial boundary. I would just watch and wonder at the miracle that made them my children. Their unbounded futures astounded me. It was a moment I wanted to last forever.

 

Our family and children came together for Thanksgiving last week. The simplicity of this year’s reunion made it especially memorable. Instead of going to a family dinner at another home, with additional families included – this was a small and private affair. Our children did not bring friends, roommates, or guests - only their fiancées. It would be an uncomplicated feast with only two goals: to savor a fine meal, and give thanks for the gift of family. Prisa arrived early and helped set up the hors d’oeuvres and drinks. She was going to spend the night and leave the following day. She and Kathy had planned a busy “Black Friday” agenda: breakfast at Nico’s Coffee Shop, checking the bridal registry at Crate and Barrel, visiting her grandfather, and returning to coach the J.V. Basketball practice at her south bay high school. Her fiancé Joe would join us during dessert, after stopping to visit and dine with long time friends and family. Toñito and his fiancé arrived after 6 o’clock. Jonaya came bearing a cornucopia of delicious side dishes.  She had cut, cooked and baked mashed potatoes (regular and garlic), collared greens, macaroni and cheese, and sweet potatoes. She had expanded on her cuisine of last year, when her talent was first revealed to us. During his bachelor days, Toñito was known to bake a pie or two for Thanksgiving, but Jonaya’s culinary magic now took priority in the kitchen. While homemade pie was a charming addition to a meal, a delicious side dish was transforming. Collared greens were my new discovery this year; and on tasting the sweet potatoes, I was again struck by how gastronomically complimentary they are with turkey and stuffing. In short, it was a delightful dining and family reunion. I recall laughter, smiles, and feasting – lots of feasting. The Nordic halls of mythic Asgard could not have hosted a finer banquet than the sumptuous Thanksgiving meal we devoured that night.
 

dedalus_1947: (Default)

By sweat of brow

Shall you earn your food,

Until you return to the ground

From which you came.

Remember, thou art dust,

And to dust thou shall return.

(Genesis 3:19)

 

As I walked down the extended, brick archway, to the church entrance, I noticed a narrow table pushed against the wall. It was piled high with posters and brochures, and festooned with bright yellow signs.  “Yes on 8: Protect Marriage” the placards read, in giant blue letters. Speeding past this gaudy altar, and ignoring the 2 men passing out flyers, I sensed that this Sunday’s liturgy was going to be difficult. Once seated, I tried centering my thoughts, and ignored the disturbing political presence at the door. The choir was settling into place and awaiting the choral master to lead them in the processional song. It was a lyrical litany of saints, followed by the melodic refrain “Pray for us”. On and on, the roll call sounded, chased by our plea for intercession: “Saint Lucy – pray for us; Saint Catherine – pray for us; Saint Francis - pray for us; Saint Joseph – pray for us; Saint Jude – pray for us; Saint Sebastian – pray for us…” Keeping rhythm with the tune, I scanned the Old and New Testament readings as the priest and altar servers marched in and began the service. When the first lector took the podium, I made a special effort to concentrate and listen to the words. Some of them were particularly reassuring.
 

 

The first reading was from the Old Testament: “Those who trust in him shall understand truth, and the faithful shall abide with him in love” (Wisdom 3: 1-9). The second reading was from the epistle of St. Paul: “Brothers and sisters: hope does not disappoint, because the love of God has been poured into our hearts” (Romans 5: 5-11).  The final reading was from the Gospel according to St. John: “Jesus said to the crowds: ‘… For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him may have eternal life, and I shall raise him on the last day’” (John 6: 37-40). The readings were comforting, and I hoped the priest would use them in his homily. Unfortunately, it was not the message of love, forgiveness, and eternal life that I heard pronounced from the pulpit that morning. Instead I heard a clear command to do my duty as a Catholic and support the sanctity of marriage by voting Yes on Proposition 8. This was the controversial amendment that sought to circumvent the 2008 California Supreme Court ruling which declared a previous same-sex marriage ban (Proposition 22) as unconstitutional. I was insulted and disappointed, but I struggled to suppress my anger. The clearest thought I had, sitting in the pew, was relief that my children and their fiancés were not present to hear this disheartening, political directive. This was the Catholic Church at its doctrinaire worst, stepping across the line between faith and politics, and wandering away from the spiritual Kingdom of God and the Good News that Jesus proclaimed. I had already decided to support the ruling of the courts by voting No on Proposition 8 and avoiding the religious controversy surrounding the debate. Now the Catholic Church was thrusting the issue back in my face and telling me how to vote from the pulpit. I had come to church with very different expectations. My plan had been to attend mass and then participate in the community celebration of Dia de los Muertos. I knew of this Mexican tradition, with the art work, foods, and activities which took place every year on this day, but I had never participated. I was hoping to go and watch, free from rancorous moral or political arguments. With an effort, I closed my mind to the priest’s exhortations and suppressed my emotions for the remainder of the service. This Sunday was All Soul’s Day, the Day of the Dead, or Dia de los Muertos. It was the final leg of the 3-day series of secular and religious rites that started with Halloween and ended on November 2. As a child, I remembered this autumnal triduum beginning with the magical words “Trick or Treat!”

 

 

Trick or treat! That declaration, or question, was the “open sesame” to the wonder and excitement of Halloween. My earliest memory of that day was dressing up in a skeleton costume and going, along with my brother and two sisters, to Abuelita’s House in Lincoln Heights. There, embraced by the family’s blend of English-and-Spanish, we were handed over to our youngest aunts and uncle, Espie, Lisa, and Charlie (see Nacimiento Stories), who instructed us in the rules and etiquette of this uniquely American tradition. Our parents and older relatives stayed at home to distribute candy, or left for adult parties, while we took to the sidewalks. It was so cool; and so simple! Halloween consisted of children banding together for courage and convenience, and calling on houses in the neighborhood to solicit candy. A child’s ease with night-time activities requires structure, and Charlie was a master at Halloween. To insure safety and profitability, he explained, five rules needed to be followed: 1) always go in a group, keeping an eye on your younger brothers and sisters, because if you lose one, you might as well never come home; 2) only visit houses with well-lit porches, because luminosity meant trick-or-treaters were safe; 3) keep the smallest and cutest children at the forefront of the group when saying “Trick ó treat!”, because adults loved being charmed before giving the finer treats; 4) never enter the homes you visit, because some adults were not to be trusted; and, finally, 5) all the collected booty had to be pooled. The length of our “trick-or-treating” depended on a variety of factors: the weather (cold was a problem, but rain was a killer); the willingness and cooperation of the little ones (the longer they held out, the richer the haul); and the game plan – to concentrate on the opulent homes, and hop-scotch along the street, or go door-to-door, visiting each house, one by one. Every year was different, because the ages and make up of our groups varied each season. However we never had a bad outing because rewards were guaranteed.

 

The key to a successful Halloween in a Mexican family was the rendezvous at the end of the evening, and the merging of loot in an elaborate ceremony. Once the “trick ó treating” was over, and all the children were back at home (the oldest kids were always the last to return, carrying the largest bags), we would huddle together with mugs of steaming chocolate, the little ones already in pajamas, to combine, and reorganize our candy. One by one, each child stepped forward, youngest to oldest, to empty their Halloween bags on the kitchen (or dining room) table. We would “ooohhh” at the bulk and shape of each sack that was raised, and “aaahhhh” as the gum, suckers, candy, and chocolate bars spilled out. Each candy was a house-memory, and the big bars of chocolate were mythic. Tales were shared and exaggerated upon for the adults who gathered around us. They would hear of the evening’s travels and adventures, of the people we met, the jokes we heard, and the odd behaviors we noticed. If time allowed, we would then adjourn to the family room to watch scary movies on television before leaving for home, or going to bed. Vampira was the fright-night diva in the mid 50’s, and her slinky, clinging, low-cut black gown, and her eastern European (Transylvanian?) accent, was the perfect nightcap to Halloween. However, before we got too excited or comfortable, or fell asleep, our mother would hustle us home or to bed. Tomorrow, she reminded us, was a holy day of obligation, and we had to go to mass.

 

 

One of the few “perks” of being a Catholic school student was having a school holiday on the day after Halloween, All Saints’ Day. However, it was a mixed blessing. On the one hand, the magic of Halloween was heightened by the blissful knowledge that there was no school the following day. On the other, there is nothing worse than being dragged out of a warm and comfortable bed, sleepy, exhausted, and grumpy at 8 o’clock on a cold or rainy morning. The fact that we were obligated, under pain of mortal sin, to attend mass on November 1, made it very clear that this was the central religious feast day of this triduum. However, for a child, the reasons weren’t obvious, although I knew the answer lay in its title. This day commemorated all the dead martyrs and saints of the Church who did not have specific feast days. Okay and why was that important to me as a second grader at St. Teresa of Avila School in Silver Lake? Why did saints need my prayers? I loved October 31, the Eve of All Saints’ Day, because it was a gaudy, folk-celebration filled with costumes, excitement, and repressed fears of death, ghosts, and demons. I also saw the value for November 2, as a day to remember dead relatives and friends. But the keystone to this triad, All Saints’ Day, was pointless; people simply went to mass and prayed for the saints. It seemed more of a hassle than a celebration. I didn’t “get it” until after my father died on November 1, 1971.

 

 

I never saw my father on the day he died. I was stationed at Norton Air Force Base, in San Bernardino at the time of his death. When I finally arrived home, his body had been removed to the mortuary. Even though he had experienced 3 previous heart attacks, and was unable to work or exert himself for over two years, his death was a shock. No one expected a husband and father of 6 children to die so suddenly. I was 23 years old at the time, and a first year soldier in the Air Force; my baby brother Alex was 4. There was something very wrong with a man dying that way. Death was for OLD people, abuelos (grandparents), bisabuelos (great-grandparents), and the ancient and infirm; my dad was only 50 years old. His disappearance made my previously ordered and predictable life seem uncertain and precarious. I saw my father on a weekend leave, and then he was gone forever. These feelings of impermanence lasted for a long time. A consequence of this unease was a series of crazy sightings I had for many years after the funeral. They would occur when driving on the freeway, and I glimpsed the familiar back of a man’s head, or a recognizable profile in the car beside me. I was convinced my father was in those cars. I tried speeding up, or re-positioning my car to confirm my impulse, but never managed to close the distance. My logic would intrude and shame me into doubting the possibility of such an encounter. I had seen my father in his casket, and knew he was buried – the dead did not rise. It was then that I began searching for confirmation of an ordered and loving universe, and the existence of people who knew the path from life to death, and could explain the detours that occurred along the way. These Beacons of Light would have to be rare individuals who had broken through the membrane of our earthly plain and achieved spiritual and metaphysical enlightenment. They knew the way, and could help others find it. These were the saints, the mystics, and the buddhas - the spiritual pathfinders of the Catholic Church, and other religions. The Church has always venerated these holy and mystical people as models, guides, and patrons who help others in their search for meaning, compassion, and the Kingdom of God. In the early church tradition, parents named their boys and girls in honor of saints, so as to bind them as spiritual co-parents to these children. In many European countries, Catholic children still celebrate two anniversaries: their birth-days (cumpleaños), AND their saint-days (dia de santos).Towns and cities were also named for saints (or dedicated to them) with the expectation that in return the municipalities would receive blessings and protection from their namesakes. Over time, although the customs continued to be practiced, the rationale for this close connection to the saints faded. In Latin America, when Spanish and Portuguese priests and monks began converting Native Americans to Catholicism, their notion of a huge body of saints (the Communion of Saints) fit perfectly with the Indian pantheon of gods, goddesses, and spirits. Indians, eager to satisfy the demands of the priests, while still maintaining their cultural identity (and in some cases their religious practices), chose Christian saint names, or adopted patron saints for towns and villages, whose feast days coincided with their pagan gods and goddess. Therefore saints, in the Catholic tradition, were a repository of wisdom and guidance, and a vital spiritual resource which had to be recognized and respected. It seemed to me, that All Saint’s Day, on November 1, was a form of spiritual insurance, a catch-all holy day for every saint who did not have their own particular feast day. The concept would make a lot of sense to the Catholic Church who did not want to slight or offend ANY saint and martyr. Six years after my father’s death, at the birth of my son, the sightings ceased. I had come to accept my father as one of the saints which the Church honored on his death day. My life changed dramatically when he died, and it seemed as if all my subsequent actions and experiences were guided by his presence and benevolent spirit. From being offered a teaching job at my high school alma mater, meeting my future bride on a blind date, to the births of my children (Toñito named after St. Anthony of Padua, and Prisa, named after St. Teresa of Avila), blessings and good fortune befell my father’s family, his children and grandchildren. However, my private canonization of my father was a personal matter, not recognized by the Church. The Church offered its own version of a day for the dead on November 2.

 

 

At the end of the “Yes on Proposition 8”mass, I escaped through a side exit, and evaded the pamphleteers who were handing out flyers to the predominately Hispanic parishioners. Once away from the pressing crowds and congestion, I took a deep breath of fresh air and continued on my way. All Soul’s Day has always been the most sensible and practical day of the triduum. It is simply the Day of the Dead. I was never really satisfied with the official Church explanation of who was a saint, who was a soul, and how Purgatory factored into this equation - so I ignored it. On the other hand, the Mexican folk customs and traditions for Dia de los Muertos fascinated me. I was intrigued by the artistic craftwork, the papier-mâché sculptures, the paintings, the candy, pastry and the elaborate decoration of family altars commemorating the dead. The celebration of Dia de los Muertos in Canoga Park, centers on a street fair along Sherman Way. It begins at the conclusion of the 9:30 Mass at the parish church, and ends with a parade back to the church for the 6 o’clock service. After mass, I parked my car near the old public library. This was a quiet and shady location, one block away from the hub of activity. I could hear and feel the thumping bass coming from distant loudspeakers as I geared up, standing next to my trunk. I took my coat, 2 cameras, a carrying case, cell phone, wallet, and notebook. This was more stuff than I needed, could use, or adequately carry; but I wanted to cover every contingency. In this over-dressed and overburdened fashion, I labored along the uneven, tree-lined sidewalk, and pushed the last vestiges of the morning’s sermon out of my head. Keeping pace with the quickening rhythms in the air, it struck me that I had no plan; I had no expectations of today’s adventure. Suddenly, I was out of the shade and into the bright sunlight of the main street. Hip-hop Latino music bounced off the one-story buildings and stores that bordered the street. A flood of men, women, teenagers, and children swirled around me and the white-topped booths in the center of the street. The island-like pavilions anchored the hundreds of craftsmen, vendors, and concessionaires who were working, cooking, or selling their wares. I was swept up in the surging multitude of walking, talking, standing, pointing, buying, and eating spectators. A riptide of flowing bodies, colors, and sounds, pushed me farther and faster than I wanted to go along the street. I came to a momentary stop when I bumped into a shaved-headed, thickly biceped, tattooed man, standing in front of a booth. There I found myself staring at a wedding cake arrangement of skulls, bones, and crucifixes. The highest layers contained finely appareled Madonna skeletons and elegant figurines of gowned and bonneted “catrina” skeletons of various sizes. I was drowning in a sea of plaster, ceramic, and papier-mâché artwork of the ghoulish and the dead. I stepped away from my cholo friend, and took hold of myself. This was going too fast, and there was too much to see, hear, and remember. I needed a plan and a perspective from which to view and appreciate these objects and experiences. I was determined to start over, concentrating on every moment. I would approach this celebration, its art, and its meaning, as a first time viewer, a fascinated student and a thoughtful photographer. I would take in all that I saw and observed. Walking back, against the pedestrian current, I slowly made my way to the intersection where I had entered, and found an empty store alcove to stop and take my bearings. I looked around.
 

 

The entire sidewalk corner was covered with a series of 4, hunched-over, technically engrossed, chalk artists, and an audience watching them work. How could I have missed this? I marveled at the care with which the artists treated the concrete surface, and their gentleness in creating something new. I’d always thought of chalk painters as sketchers, caricaturists, or street hustlers who turned a quick-trick on the ground for a few extra dollars. These were authentic artists, teachers, and philosophers, who used the earth as their medium, and the street as their studio.The artists only painted images of macabre, iconic, or historical significance. The first sidewalk fresco was an anatomically detailed skeleton (esqueleto), bordered in a field of black; the next was a giant portrait of Frida Kahlo, the Mexican artist, feminist, and political activist of the 1930’s and 40’s; the third was a stylized depiction of a dancing, Mexican esqueleto, wearing a wide-brimmed mariachi sombrero; and the last was a painting of Emiliano Zapata, the legendary Mexican revolutionary of the 1910’s. I could see mothers and fathers pointing out these figures to their children. It was reminiscent of the first time I saw the historical murals of Siqueiros and Orozco in Mexico City and heard elderly grandparents using them as illustrations of the national struggles of Mexico for their grandchildren. Sadly, these sidewalk murals would not last the week. By Tuesday or Wednesday, pedestrians, skateboarders, joggers and cyclists would no longer avoid defacing the works by walking around them. Indifferent wheels, shoes, and sneakers would soon rub away and erase the momentary images that existed on the sidewalk. This was one of the over-arching themes that ran through the day and the festival – death and impermanence; nothing lasts forever, and everything dies. This theme was manifested in every artistic medium in the festival. I was surrounded by art. It was in the air, on the ground, and in each stall; creation and decay, innovation and destruction, beginnings and endings. I spent 3 hours exploring the street fair on Dia de los Muertos. I visited every booth, inspected all the paintings and artwork, explored the roof and balcony floors of the Madrid Theatre, watched the Aztec dancers, and listened to the mariachi bands. The preponderance of skulls (calaveras), skeletons (esqueletos), and stylized crucifixes were a constant reminder of death, and yet, life and renewal was everywhere.
 

 

Halloween is not celebrated in Mexico. There are no festivities on the EVE of All Saints’ Day; the holiday occurs the next day. Dia de los Muertos is a blossoming of a transplanted European religious practice. I saw this immediately in a recurring image that was visible in every booth and exhibit I passed. The repetition of esqueletos and calaveras in paintings, drawings, figurines, candy and bread, makes those images appear uniquely Mexican. The most recognized Mexican figures are the paintings and drawings of a string or quintet of musical skeletons dancing, strutting, or playing instruments. In fact, this common motif is a lineal descendent of the late medieval engravings and woodcuts of The Danse Macabre (The Dance of Death). The 1400’s were dark and dangerous times in Europe. This was the period when the Four Horseman of the Apocalypse (Death, Famine, Pestilence, and War) terrorized the countryside, cities, and towns. These were the Dark Ages; the times of witchcraft and the Black Plague which left such an indelible impression on the hearts, minds, and imaginations of Europeans, and gave birth to the images of the Danse Macabre. The original depiction showed Death leading a row of dancing figures from all walks of life to the grave. The “dance” was an allegory of the equality and inevitability of death – no matter our wealth, station, or age, everyone will die. It was a reminder of the Christian concept of the fragility of life, and the hollowness of the vanities of wealth, youth, and beauty. It was also a reminder of the statement in Genesis that we are dust, and to dust we will return. The only escape from this short and brutish life was eternal happiness in Heaven. However, only the Catholic Church held the keys to this Kingdom; it held the power to forgive sins and erase the impediments to heaven. Therefore, All Souls’ Day was the European feast day that concentrated the efforts of the living on praying and offering masses and indulgences for the dead (this would later be corrupted into the practice of paying for masses and indulgences - which prompted Martin Luther into starting the Protestant Reformation). This was the religious iconography and traditions that the Catholic Church brought to Mexico and the Americas in the 1500’s. However, instead of surrendering to them, the Indians changed them. Just as a Mexican representation of the Danse Macabre transposed a frightful line of awkwardly moving skeletons, into a merry and raucous band of mariachi esqueletos, so it took a morbid feast day for the dead, and transformed it into a festive celebration of the living.

 



 

The rhythmic rattles and steady beat of the Indian drums alerted me to the main attraction at the center of the street fair. There, at the foot of the main stage, a troop of eight plumed and costumed performers moved and swayed to the flute and percussion arrangement of a pre-Cortesian dance. The complexity of the choreography belied the simplicity of the beat. The music was easy to follow and it attracted larger and larger audiences. Standing at the outer limits of the crowd, and searching for a line of sight that would allow photographs of the dancers, I was struck by the irony of this sight. What was being memorialized here, Mexico’s pagan past or the liberating new religion? This indigenous pageant pointed out one of Mexico’s central mysteries – whose religion actually won out after the “conquest”?

 

 

By 1550, Spain and Portugal occupied all of Mexico, Central and South America, and were inadvertently melding the two peoples and cultures into one. The possibility of mixing the religions would have been anathema. However, in converting Indians to Catholicism, enlightened missionaries first learned the indigenous languages, the cultures, and the religions of the vanquished people. Then they taught their own doctrine by pointing out the differences, similarities, and superior benefits of the Catholic faith. Sophisticated Indian religions were violent and bloody, with human sacrifices and cannibalism a common feature at the highest levels of observance. Aztec, Inca, and Mayan ceremonies included pulsating hearts being ripped out of heaving chests, and walls of skulls decorating pyramid topping temples. The pastoral religion of Abraham, Moses, and Jesus Christ was certainly an improvement over this, even with its morbid medieval iconography of suffering, torture, and death. Showing similarities was meant to comfort and reassure the Indians that converting to Christianity was the smart thing to do. To emphasize the inevitability of submission, the Spaniards even built their churches and cathedrals atop the rubble of destroyed pyramid temples and shrines. The victors never expected the Indians to fuse or unify the Christian beliefs and forms with Indian practices and observances. Priests and friars began suspecting this syncretistic practice only when they discovered pagan idols and statuettes behind church altars, or buried on church grounds and in cemeteries. Dia de los Muertos, became one of these syncretistic observances.

 

Standing on the balcony of the Madrid Theatre, I saw the full sweep of the day’s events. The Aztec dancers had moved to a courtyard setting, the juvenile mariachi bands were mobilizing near the outdoor stage, and wave after wave of people flowed in and around the tables, booths and exhibits on the street. Until today, I had never seen a Dia de los Muertos celebration. My visits and vacations to Mexico never coincided with this fall holiday, and the customs were not observed in my family. While my mother was strict in observing the religious aspects of the feast days, we never took part in any of the Dia de los Muertos activities. I was only academically familiar with the history, artwork, iconography, and practices of this day through stories, books and pictures. It took a discovery by Kathy’s parents, Mary and the doctor (see On My Way to You), to pique my ethnic curiosity and revitalize my own interest in the central aspects of this Mexican holiday.

 

 

After the death of their daughter Debbie (see The Pleiades), Mary and the doctor became regular visitors to the San Fernando Mission Cemetery. It was there, surrounded by the graves of many Mexican and Mexican-American families that they observed a curious phenomenon. Throughout the year, Mexican families would descend on the graves of loved ones and stand, sit, gossip, or picnic. These were not drive-by occasions, but full half-day excursions. The families would bring gardening equipment, blankets, chairs and tables, and they would tend, decorate, and deposit gifts, food, beer, and pictures at the site. They would also bring, and set up miniature Christmas trees, televisions, Valentine’s Day bouquets, and Easter eggs baskets. It seemed as if these families were continuing to include their departed sister, brother, mother, or father in the cyclical celebrations of life that occupied the living. While these practices at first shocked my in-laws, they also gave them license to maintain their own level of intense communion with their deceased daughter. Mary was especially fascinated with the Dia de los Muertos custom of setting up private altars by the headstones, and there placing the favorite foods, beverages, photos, and memorabilia of the departed. When she asked me about it, I explained that many rural and provincial Mexicans held the folk belief that during Day of the Dead, it was easier for souls of the departed to visit the living. Therefore, families went to cemeteries not only to REMEMBER the dead, but to coax and encourage them to VISIT and STAY with them for a while. The altars were meant as spiritual inducements to the dead. Small shrines were placed at the gravesites, but larger, more elaborate altars were constructed at home. These were the multi-tiered altars flowing with countless candles, food, cakes, candies, crosses, statues, images of the saints and the Virgen de Guadalupe, and photographs of deceased relatives and friends.

 

 

At the conclusion of my day, walking past a car with a “Yes on Proposition 8” bumper sticker, I felt oddly reassured. I had spent the day witnessing how a people and a culture can affect the Church by simply ignoring a dreary, solemn practice, and changing it into a joyful observance. All Souls’ Day (Day of the Dead) was never part of Christ’s message to humanity; it was an observance of the Church, meant to point us in the right direction (the finger pointing at the moon). Mexico translated and modified this day into something very different. Dia de los Muertos, with all its images and pictures of skulls and skeletons, is not about remembering the dead, and the inevitability of our own death. Paradoxically, the day is a celebration of this brief and wonderful life.  The calaveras are decorated and transformed into sugared candies and curious figurines for the living. Esqueletos are not presented as frightful reminders of decay and decomposition, but as slender, well-dressed mariachi musicians, or curvaceous and elegantly gowned women who are here to entertain and seduce. This is the day when the dead can remember being alive, and perhaps leave us, the living, with a message: “Life may be short, harsh, and unfair, but it is such a blessing – so treasure every moment”.
 



 

dedalus_1947: (Default)

You unlock this door

with the key of imagination.

Beyond it

is another dimension;

a dimension of sound,

a dimension of sight,

a dimension of mind.

You’re moving into a land

of both shadow and substance,

of things and ideas.

You’ve just crossed over

into the Twilight Zone.

(Preface to each episode of The Twilight Zone, by Rod Serling)

 

I wrote a poem last week and called it First Thoughts. The original title was “Orthotics”; but that exotic word did not convey the feelings I was trying to express. The word orthotic WAS the first thought I had while jogging that day, and it became my theme. Instead of using prose, I wanted to describe the mental images that went through my head in another way. It was an exercise in “right-brain thinking”. Once I started, and stopped worrying about the logic of my words and phrases, it was quite liberating. This makes the third poem I’ve written. I wrote one for my birthday (Birthday Boy), and another one about my memories of Mexico (Calle Chopo). I once tried composing a lament when I learned of a fellow principal’s death. He had a heart attack and died the day before his school was to be evaluated by the District’s Red Team. I only finished one stanza before my anger at the District consumed me and the words turned to ash. Poetry is a new way of writing for me; an abstract and symbolic means of communicating that’s solid and transcendent at the same time. Poems are metaphorical images that crack the code of the Unconscious, and allow one to describe feelings and emotions that are otherwise, inexpressible. It is the language of the Japanese haiku, and the Zen koan. On this occasion, the time I invested in First Thoughts, helped distract me from a crisis in my writing.
 

 


I had been on a writing streak since the New Year; averaging one essay a week. Topics would pop into my head, or suggest themselves by the activities and events that surrounded me. However, after posting V for Vandalism , an essay which explored new journalistic territory for me, I lost my desire to write. Despite a huge backlog of ideas, nothing prompted me to act. I just didn’t care to start a new writing project. This ennui even crept into my rituals of morning journaling and afternoon jogging. I’d stopped running for periods of time before, but I had never experienced such a disinterest in writing. I felt “becalmed”, like a sailboat brought unexpectedly motionless by the sudden drop in the wind. This stillness was a new sensation; it was like being adrift and directionless, but it wasn’t writer’s block or depression. Since the listlessness seemed benign, I didn’t panic. Instead, I tried to address the little things that were troubling me. I struggled to go jogging when I could, and complete Morning Pages when I was able. The afternoon I did go running, I had my “First Thought” about Orthotics. Another morning, while agonizing over what to write, the image of the Sunday Missalette materialized in my mind. When attending mass the day before, I noticed we were celebrating the 29th Sunday in Ordinary Time. The thought of those two words reached across my memory and grabbed me by the neck. Ordinary Time - what delicious words, and they seemed so fitting, given my current state and frame of mind. I held to this slender thread of inspiration and developed the following ideas about this ubiquitous season.

 

According to Wikipedia, Ordinary Time is one of the five “seasons” of the Catholic liturgical calendar. The name corresponds to the Latin term Tempus per annum, which means, literally, “time through the year”. Ordinary Time actually comprises two periods of the liturgical year – one following Epiphany (12 days after Christmas), and the other after Pentecost (49 days after Easter). The four other seasons are Advent, Christmas, Lent, and Easter. In other words, Ordinary Time occurs before and after the two most active phases in the Church’s annual cycle. I always considered it a “breather” in the life of a parish after the frenetic and emotional rituals and ceremonies of Christmas and Easter. It was an opportunity for the pastor, ministers, and congregation to catch their breath and rest. The season signaled the end game - the cessation of rites and celebrations, and a time to recover and renew. Ordinary Time was also the anticipatory prelude to Advent, and it fits perfectly with autumn. I felt that fall signified the procession of annual events that ended with Christmas: school, the World Series, football games, cold weather, Halloween, elections, and Thanksgiving. These perennials are so predictable and comfortable, that they seemed ORDINARY. However, the liturgical term Ordinary does not mean “common, conventional or plain”. In fact, the word is derived from the term ordinal or "numbered." The 33 or 34 weeks in Ordinary Time are simply “numbered” periods of astronomical notation. It did strike me as odd, that this liturgical season corresponded to a current period, which I saw as truly remarkable. Since the Feast of the Epiphany we have been living in the most EXTRAORDINARY of political and historical times.

  

  

This season witnessed the most improbable political events in American history. A white woman and an African-American man were the two leading contenders in the Democratic primaries. With the surprise emergence of Barack Obama as a frontrunner in the Iowa Caucuses (A Whisper of Hope), the campaign became a drawn out, knock-down, drag-out fight, with Hilary Clinton. She never gave an inch or conceded any set-back or defeat until every conceivable political, electoral, and legal tactic had been tried and exhausted. Despite efforts to minimize it significance, race and gender dominated private thoughts and public discussions. Could a black man win the presidential election? Would Americans vote for a woman president? As Obama’s superior organization, fundraising, and strategy continued winning primaries and increasing their delegate count, the Clinton camp dropped their message of experience and sanctioned negative excursions into emotional territory. Barack’s association with Reverend Jeremiah Wright and former Weather Underground terrorist Bill Ayers were used to imply that he was somehow un-American, “not one of us”, and not to be trusted. Despite these attacks, Obama continued winning key primaries, and by June 3, had won enough delegates to officially become the Democratic nominee. Clinton conceded 2 days later. Then in late August through October, with the Presidential race in full swing, we moved “into a land of both shadow and substance, of things and ideas”. We entered the Twilight Zone when media-driven momentum swings, the credit and financial meltdown, and last ditch, mudslinging efforts took over the campaigns.

  

 

Although I was decided on my choice for president, I was still curious about watching the presidential debates and seeing how events unfolded. At the outset, both candidates claimed to be avatars, or embodiments, of CHANGE: Barack Obama, because he was a Democrat with a new philosophical agenda, and John McCain, because he was a maverick, constantly at odds with his own party. The Democratic game plan was to paint McCain with the George W. Bush-Republican brush of failed economic and military policies, and color him as an out-of-touch, outdated inheritor and promoter of 4 more years of the same policies. The Republican game plan was to paint Obama with the tax-raising, big-spending Democrat brush, and color him as too Ivy League, too liberal, and too inexperienced to lead a nation in difficult and dangerous times. In August, the early advantage went to Obama. His triumphant tour of Europe and the Middle East, followed by the spectacularly staged nominating convention, shot him into the early lead. He was new, eloquent, and different; and he offered a fresh change from the Republican economic and foreign relation policies that were stalemated in Iraq, deteriorating in Afghanistan, and in denial of the ticking financial time-bomb. Faced with Obama’s seemingly overwhelming popularity, McCain was able to change the political momentum in September, regain the public’s attention, and generate media excitement with a new, wide-open, game plan. While Barack “kept the ball on the ground” with his grinding and methodical message, John came out throwing. The inspired selection of Sarah Palin, the governor of Alaska, as his vice-presidential running mate galvanized the Republican convention and captured the nation’s imagination. The media couldn’t get enough of her – especially since they were not allowed direct access without carefully established ground rules and controlled formats. Palin and McCain appearances were the hottest tickets in town, and speculation of a Ronald Reagan Republican Renaissance filled the radio airways and television talk shows. Overnight, they were the winning combination: McCain had the desired experience and conservative credentials, and Palin was in touch with the common American man and woman, Joe Six-pack and Hockey mom. Obama now appeared distant and cerebral, and his message sounded dull and alarmist. On this wave of popularity, in the middle of what seemed an exhilarating, downhill Republican ski race to November 4th, there was a slight rumble on the financial mountain of Wall Street. On September 5, the U.S. Government, fearing the bankruptcy of the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac), seized control of these two mortgage giants. It would be the first of many moves to nationalize troubled financial institutions. As the foreclosure and banking tremors continued, Barack kept criticizing the Republican deregulation policies, while John recited the administration mantra that “the fundamentals of our economy are strong”.  By September 24th, even President Bush was ready to concede that a subprime mortgage crisis existed, and the federal government needed to nationalize private institutions to save our financial system. Throughout October, the mortgage, credit and stock market avalanche built up overwhelming force and cascaded down to what will eventually be a millennial crash. During this period, the worst since 1929, the electoral momentum had again swung to Obama and the Democrats, where it has remained.

 

 

The economic situation in the United States and the world has dictated the ebb and flow of this presidential campaign. So far, it seems to work in favor of Obama’s methodical approach and consistent message. The worsening financial picture has framed his calm and steady demeanor, and his unhurried and measured approach to problem-solving and decision-making in a very favorable light. McCain, on the other hand, continued with his “run-and-gun” style of campaigning, throwing one ‘Hail Mary pass” after another, in the hopes of regaining the lead. He suspended his campaigning appearances to rush back to Washington D.C. and tried to direct the fiscal rescue plan; he threatened to ignore the 1st debate to concentrate on the crisis; and he insisted on firing the chairman of the Federal Securities and Exchange Commission, Christopher Cox. During the first debate, an aggressive McCain appeared disdainful, and dismissive of Obama, claiming he was naïve, inexperienced, and “dangerous”, while Obama came across as careful, reflective, and precise in his answers and explanations. These impressions of the two candidates were sustained in the 2nd and 3rd debates, even as the banking, credit, and stock market situations became worse.

 

 

The latest offensive barrage by the McCain-Palin duo has been a variation on the wedding tradition for luck, of using “something old, something new, something borrowed, and something blue”. They hammered at the age-old accusation that Obama and the Democrats would raise taxes and destroy small businesses; they accused Obama of being a socialist who sought to redistribute the wealth and reward welfare mothers; and they resuscitated the mudslinging attacks first launched by Hilary Clinton about his association with 60’s terrorist Bill Ayers. From these three fanciful premises, McCain and Palin tried to characterize Barack Obama as an unreliable, two-faced politician, who was a committed, un-American terrorist, and a subversive socialist planning to overthrow the capitalist system. If these portrayals sought to provoke nationwide fear and panic in the electorate, they do not appear to be getting much traction. The economic situation, with its threats of massive unemployment, evaporating retirement funds, and a world-wide depression, is a lot scarier than a Democrat in the White House. I will say one thing for John McCain; even in his desperation, he has not adopted the Carl Rove-ian terror tactics that were employed in the 2004 Republican primaries against him, and against John Kerry in the general election. There is actually SOME logic behind the negative attacks against Obama, albeit incredibly associative and exaggerated.
  

 

Who will win this election, which took place during Ordinary Time in the liturgical calendar? I honestly don’t know. After the roller coaster ride of the primaries, the radical pendulum swings of the general election, and the disintegration of our leveraged, highly speculative, free market, capitalistic system, I haven’t a clue. I distrust polls and pundits, and financial managers; and I have no confidence in my ability to think like an “average” American. I feel this will be a very close election, and I’m apprehensive about the margin of victory. The nation has grown incredibly polarized over the last eight years, and past presidential elections proved that clear majorities did not exist in our culturally divided and fearful electorate. I have discovered one thing during this extraordinary time: to again have faith and confidence in American Youth.

 

My journey on this election road has been guided by the actions of young people I know, and have come to respect and admire: my daughter, Prisa, working as a precinct volunteer for a year in the Obama For President campaign; my nephew Billy donating the financial maximum to the Obama campaign, and then creating a political action committee to raise more; and my niece Maria standing in the Pennsylvania rain to see and hear a new message about tomorrow from a dripping wet, African-American candidate for president. Silent circumspection and discretion are the watchwords of our family when it comes to politics and political action. The fact that I learned of these three incidents makes me suspect that many, many more actions were performed by my countless nephews and nieces in support of this unique candidate. I can honestly say that I have been led to my current views about this year and this election by the youth of the nation. They never told me who to vote for, but their actions made me see Barack Obama in a different light. These times have seen the rebirth of youthful idealism and hope at a time we need both. We will need the determined action of a new generation to recover from the shambles of this financial catastrophe that was fed by greed, arrogance, and cynicism. These young people bring a willingness to volunteer, commit, and work to overcome the challenges and obstacles before us. Does Barack have the answers? No, but he may be able to frame the problems that need to be addressed and resolved. Our hope will not be in one man, but in the followers he can inspire and support in the years to come. As Wall Street’s Tower of Babel continues cracking and crumbling, the voices of young people seem to rise up. There is a new music in the air, and it is a song of hope, optimism, and determination. The voices belong to the young and they echo the music I once heard at civil rights marches and peace demonstrations in the 60’s and 70’s. Instead of feeling angry and bitter about the criminal actions of greedy Wall Street financiers, bankers, and loan agents, I’d rather look forward to creating something new and better. I think young people might be pointing the way.
 


dedalus_1947: (Default)

Orthotic: Taken from Latin
meaning artificial support, or brace;

and Greek, meaning to straighten.

The science that deals

with the use of custom-built

devices, such as molded insoles,

which fit in a shoe to make foot

motion more efficient, to reduce

the risk of foot injury, or to

correct anatomical imbalances

that may lead to pain in the

back, hips, knees, and feet.


 

 
Gliding on cement-smooth paths,

My lungs fill with air

That the heart converts

Into energy, and

Propels my driving pistons.

 

Bubbly, bouncy, buoyant

Freedom

Pulses through my veins,

And oxygenates the cells

In my head.

 

Cascading images in

Orange and black, of

Pumpkins and chimneys,

Fill my head with

Aching memories

Of agony and dread.

 

In midstride,

Teetering

Between past and present,

A file cabinet drawer rolls open,

And I think:

Where were you last Thursday?

 

Those roadrunner mornings,

Were rudely awakened,

With bloody, stiletto pikes.

Stepping through those wispy dreams,

I still feel the naked sting,

Of metallic frozen streets.

 

Tender petals of baby skin,

Leave a spotted trail

That only I can feel

On the moon lit rug.

Will it ever end?

 

Trails never to be seen,

Nor inspirations grasped.

This would bring a halt

To the mysterious gestalt

Of mindful running.

 

 

All those nightmare fears,

Quelled by a jello mold

That frees the wind

And shakes the earth.

Thank you,

Dr. Liebeskind!


dedalus_1947: (Default)

Remember, remember,
The fifth of November

The Gunpowder Treason and plot;

I know of no reason

Why the Gunpowder Treason

Should ever be forgot.

(Variation of traditional rhyme recited on Guy Fawkes Night, in the graphic novel and movie, V for Vendetta, by Alan Moore.)

 

I glided my car down the slope of the freeway off ramp and stopped at the stop sign. Years of constant repetition forced me to look carefully for oncoming traffic on my left and possible pedestrians on my right. It was evening, and although a street light shone overhead, intervals of darkness, like long, black dashes, hyphenated the sidewalk and curbs of this section of Ventura Boulevard. These blind spots could easily hide a cyclist or child. Seeing nothing, I turned sharply to the right onto the boulevard, then right again, onto Shoup Avenue. Cruising at a easy speed, my mind slowly drifted back to the football game I’d just watched, and UCLA’s stunning upset over Tennessee. I shook my head, thinking of the miserable performance of the Bruin quarterback in the first half, and his redemption in the final minutes of the game and overtime. What a great season opener! After traveling a mile or so, I looked sharply to my right. Somewhere along this tree-lined and familiar route, a mocking hint seemed to be whispered in my ear. “Something’s wrong”, a shadowed voice hissed. I looked again. Everything was in its place along the street; there was nothing out of order. However, I couldn’t shake the uneasy feeling of wrongness, as I drove. At the well-lit intersection of Victory Boulevard, I sensed it again. “There’s something wrong” I seemed to hear. Now I was frustrated. I was missing something. I concentrated fully on the road ahead, and checked off each object as I approached them on the street: the curb, sidewalk, grass, tree, sign pennants, apartments, houses, street sign, speed sign, mobile ad, bus stop, street lights, and intersection. Everything was there, and everything was in the right place; so what was wrong? As I came to the last large intersection at Sherman Way, I stopped for the red light. Staring at the street and curb ahead, I again thought “What am I missing?” I turned away for a moment to watch the gas station customers using the pumps and walking into the mini-mart at the corner as the signal changed. When I drove across the intersection, I glanced to the curb and finally saw the detail I had been missing. A tall, mobile billboard, about 5 feet tall and 3 feet across, was mounted atop a licensed trailer platform. I had seen these mobile ads all along Shoup; what I had missed was the distinct lettering. As I passed the sign, I saw that all the words on the white background had been blocked out in black house paint with wide brush roller strokes. Nothing was readable. Each of the 6 or 7 curbside billboards along Shoup, between Ventura Boulevard and Sherman Way had been defaced and vandalized that evening.
 



I discovered this damage on Labor Day, the night of the UCLA game, on my way home. I’d been noticing these mobile billboards in the west San Fernando Valley region, all year long, especially on streets with heavy traffic density and large stretches of open curb space. Shoup and Fallbrook Avenues, sections of Topanga Canyon, and Roscoe and Devonshire Boulevards, were places where they seemed most prominent. These mobile ads and curbside billboards have become ubiquitous and annoying; they prevent the flow of traffic, and disrupt the scenic continuity of neighborhood streets. I have to admit that a part of me was secretly amused by the idea that an ordinary citizen had finally gotten “fed up” and struck a blow against billboard pollution. However, this was not a one-night stunt. Over the course of the next three weeks I saw more and more of these painted and defaced curbside signs, billboards, and mobile ads. This was not a single symbolic act; it was a crime spree. The more defaced billboards I saw along Topanga Canyon or Shoup, the more troubled I became. Who was doing it, and why? Had a citizen despaired of city government and the law, and was now taking matters into their own hands? Was this vigilantism, or a personal vendetta? It was clear that considerable damage was being done. Someone was losing money, and an angry citizen (or citizens) was increasing the odds of being identified and apprehended. My speculations would flare up whenever I saw a defaced billboard on the street. After three weeks of letting my imagination run wild, I finally decided to get some facts. I called one of the telephone numbers on an undamaged trailer hitch carrying a mobile billboard, and talked to Bill of Mobile Ads. He confirmed that the crime spree started on the Labor Day weekend and hadn’t stopped. The first billboards vandalized were the property of At a Glance advertisements, and a report had been made to the police. So far, Bill had suffered only about $800 worth of damage.

 

Bill’s information only raised more questions. Were these destructive acts aimed at businesses or the city’s parking ordinances? Municipal codes permit these vehicles to occupy curb space. Had this citizen become so frustrated with the city that he transferred his civic outrage to other citizens? Had he fanned and stoked his anger to the point of willfully damaging other people’s property? Vandalism is a vile and negative act; it is committed subversively, and under cover of darkness. The defacement of these billboards disturbed me. Wrongs were not corrected; laws were not changed; and civil rights were not protected. My conversation with Bill put a human voice to the phenomenon I was watching played out in the west San Fernando Valley. He sounded relieved that someone was discussing the problem. For him, this was not a crime against property; it was a personal attack. He told me that people just didn’t want to see these ads on the street. They called him and threatened him. He was responsive when callers were civil and polite in stating their complaints or requests, but he couldn’t understand the hate and violence. The only counter-strategy he had was to keep his trailers moving on a regular basis, and not concentrating them on one street.
 

 

I couldn’t help but be sympathetic to Bill’s plight, and angry at the perpetrator. There is always a side of us that wants to root for the underdog, the little guy, the lone voice calling in the wilderness. We love to be angry at them - the government, “the man”, bureaucracy, or lawyers. Stories abound around the world of heroes rising up to fight greedy overlords and faceless bureaucracies: Robin Hood and “his merry band of outlaws” plagued England’s Prince John, Zorro fought the alcalde of Los Angeles, Jesse James attacked the railroads in Kansas and Missouri, and Emiliano Zapata opposed Victoriano Huerta and the federales of Mexico. But what happens when one underdog victimizes another underdog. Bill was not a “fat cat”, a greedy, Wall Street capitalist. He works hard, answers the phone Monday through Sunday, worries about his trailers, and shepherds the mobile ads and signs to safe pastures; he’s just an ordinary guy trying to make a living.

 

I’m not a stranger to vandalism; as a public school principal it happens to school buildings and walls all the time (see A Monday without Graffiti), I should also confess, that some years, graffiti vandalism becomes such an overwhelming problem, that I find myself fantasizing about placing land mines or snipers on roofs to stop despoilers from defacing my professional home. Of course I never give into these murderous thoughts, but I still have to guard against impulsive tendencies that punish innocent students or “the usual suspects” who come so readily to mind when vandalism occurs. First of all, I have to step back and wonder if I have become “the man” to somebody’s Robin Hood. Is the graffiti a political act or destructive mischief? Next I avoid reacting to these crimes by restricting or depriving students of their rights or privileges. Closing frequently “tagged up” restrooms does not stop vandalism; it only produces annoyance, anger, and constipation among other students (and their parents). Lastly, I have to avoid harassing or prosecuting the students who fit my profile of likely hoodlums, simply because I don’t like the way they look, act, dress, or behave. Over 24 years of anecdotal experiences have taught me that “the usual suspects” are rarely guilty of anonymous crimes. The few times we actually caught a teenage vandal, spoke with their shamed and humbled parents, and heard the perpetrator’s childish and thoughtless reasons for destruction, they actually made sense to me. Children’s and adolescent mental development allows them to make stupid choices; our goal as teachers is to help them learn to THINK and make better ones. But the vandalism I was seeing in the west San Fernando Valley was different. The actions of thoughtless and boneheaded kids are bad, but developmentally logical; the deliberate and malicious act of retaliation or vigilantism, by adults, against private property was sinful.
 

 

The billboard bandit has staked himself to dangerous ground. He is not a vigilante in the classic sense, because the laws that regulate street parking are flexible and open to challenge – if one is determined, the law can be changed. Impatience with the legal system is not justification for violence; attacking a person who annoys you, but obeys the law, is a personal vendetta and a crime. This is what I believe is happening in the West Valley, and it bewilders me. The mobile ad marauder is not a child or a teenager; he’s an adult who is making criminal choices.

dedalus_1947: (Default)

It is time I stepped aside

for a less experienced

and less able man.

(Scott Elledge, author and English professor)

 

At the end of my first year at Shangri-la, the faculty, in a burst of euphoric optimism, voted to join the LEARN (Los Angeles Alliance for Restructuring Now) Initiative, a consortium of District schools united in a reform effort to improve schools and student achievement by empowering teachers, administrators, and parents. It involved four weeks of summer training in Palms Springs that was hot, tedious and boring. However, the experience had 2 side benefits; it allowed me to build a long-term, trusting relationship with Dorothy, the teacher union rep, and introduced me to 2 “trainers” (instructional advisors) who were more interested in personal wisdom and improving human relationships than studying data and management systems. I liked one in particular, who, at the end of our last week, told me of two books that had changed her views on careers and education. She recommended The Artist’s Way, by Julia Cameron, and Management of the Absurd: Paradoxes in Leadership, by Richard Farson. Cameron’s book offered a radically new approach to self-awareness and jobs. In her work with “blocked” painters and writers, Cameron helped them overcome their creative paralysis with Morning Pages - the simple practice of producing 3 pages of spontaneous, reflective writing every morning. I never thought of myself as artistic, or creative, but the practice helped me to survive my second year at Shangri-la.
 

 

My daily entries of Morning Pages stretch from September 22, 1996 to April 17, 1997 (when they suddenly stopped for 8 months). They chronicled my solitary struggles and the steady deterioration of my physical and psychological health as I battled the insubordination, defiance, and undermining efforts of three staff members. The conflict began as a tropical depression at the start of the year, gained intensity through the winter, and reached hurricane proportions in the spring. Principals are easy targets if one wishes to relentlessly criticize and attack them, because they are responsible for EVERY aspect of a school, and for EVERY action, error, oversight, and mistake by the people they supervise. Principals sin by commission (what they actually do), and omission (what they didn’t do); and they are only as successful as their clients (teachers, parents, and students) believe them to be. If principals become hesitant and fearful, they run the risk of pandering to their opponents, and judging themselves through the eyes of their critics. In doing so, they lose all confidence, becoming more and more isolated and suspicious of everyone; finally despairing, completely – as I did. At first, I arrogantly thought I could handle the growing problems by myself; refusing to believe that two or three unhappy, and determined, staff members could effect my removal from a school. I was confident that if I acted intelligently, professionally, and ethically, I was safe and secure. I never expected the opposite behaviors by my opponents: unauthorized and unsigned letters with outrageous lies about me, assistant principals, and teachers, being placed in faculty mailboxes; formal petitions with unverified parent signatures being mailed to District administrators and board members demanding my immediate removal for lack of leadership; and visits to elected officials and community leaders by spokesmen of a parent organization secretly directed by my disaffected coordinators to make unsubstantiated allegations of supervisory incompetence, intimidation, and racial discrimination. It was a gradual campaign of slander and innuendo, which grew and grew because the accusations were so outrageous and so incredible, that reasonable parents, teachers, and administrators began wondering if there weren’t SOME grounds for suspicion. In December I was ready to ask for help from the LEARN trainers and my administrative team (composed of assistant principals, trusted coordinators, the teacher’s union rep, my administrative assistant, and a counselor). I didn’t want them to assume my burden, but I realized that I desperately needed their help to generate ideas, implement strategies, and win others to our cause. The LEARN trainers recommended a battle plan of transparency, full disclosure, and Fabian battle tactics; which translated into systematically exposing the sneaky, underhanded, and unethical maneuvers employed by our opponents, and pouncing on their errors and misjudgments. In doing this we built leadership capacity and awareness in the faculty and among parents, and I documented every unethical and unprofessional misstep they took; following it up with a witnessed meeting and a conference memo. It was a smart strategy, but it took time, a long, long time of ceaseless conflict and guerrilla warfare - and I did not feel I was winning.
 

 

In April, I was dreading going to school. Every day promised a new catastrophe, a new crisis, or another emotional scene of defiance and confrontation with one of the opposing staff members or their minions. I could only compare my feelings to the “battle fatigue” that bomber crews experienced during World War II after countless missions over flak infested skies where they were sitting ducks for enemy fighter pilots and anti-aircraft guns. Yet, even at that point, I hadn’t hit the depth of my despair. It was not until the first Friday of the month that I realized how broken I was. I was driving home when the aftermath of the week caught up with me. The week was the same as many others that year, with the usual emotional incidents: the same group of parents going (for the fourth time) to the Office of the Deputy Superintendent to demand my removal; the coordinator and her community rep again scheduling a meeting with the Cluster Leader to report my unfair treatment of them; and the parent officers of the advisory council demanding my presence at a special budget meeting to answer their questions. These highlights flashed through my mind, and when I arrived home, I just sat in the car, without moving, for about 30 minutes. I felt shell-shocked and depressed. I was comatose – just sitting there, gulping deep breaths, closing my eyes, and then opening them to stare off, vacantly, into space. I’d spent the day dealing with emotional personnel and angry administrative interactions that had drained me. I was paralyzed and unable to think or make decisions. I felt helpless and overwhelmed by these never-ending problems and the constant realization that they were being taken “over my head” and delivered directly to my superiors. Feelings of failure and inadequacy welled up like a giant, black wave, and then came crashing down over me. I only had one wish – I wanted to feel competent again. I wished I could once again act with confidence instead of reacting with doubts, fears, and uncertainty. That evening Kathy finally stepped in and, by telling me what she was observing in my actions and behaviors, put a mirror to my face and let me see for myself what I had become in the course of the year. I wasn’t sleeping through the night, awakening daily at 2:00 or 3:00 A.M. and not being able to return; I was experiencing gripping aches and pains in my back, neck and chest which were recurrent; I was coming down with constant colds and coughs; I had stopped jogging and exercising, replacing a healthy routine with daily cocktails at 6 o’clock, and drinking wine with dinner; I had developed an uncontrollable and annoying twitch in my upper eyelid; my handwriting had deteriorated so badly that my secretary (who had worked with me for 4 years) could no longer decipher it; and I was always so sad, that not even Prisa’s animated talk after a basketball game could cheer me. Kathy told me that she loved me, and would do anything to help, but if I could not recognize the symptoms for myself there was no hope. I was stunned, but not blind. I called Employee Assistance the next day, and scheduled a psychiatric assessment the following week. The psychiatrist confirmed what Kathy already knew and I suspected; I was clinically depressed, and had been for a long time. What surprised me most was my quick consent in accepting medication and therapy; a lifetime of stoic bravado, machismo, and hubris melted in seconds before my desire to be ME again – the intrepid, curious, and humorous assistant principal who found his job interesting and wanted to learn how to be a principal.
 


By May, the conflict had boiled to the point of direct confrontation. A handful of parents had finally gone to the School Cluster Leader demanding that I meet with them to answer their complaints, allegations, and demands. Suspecting an ambush, or, worse, an inquisition followed by public burning at the stake, I had dodged this frontal assault for weeks - believing myself vulnerable and defenseless. The Cluster Leader, however, sided with the parents and she directed me to appear at their meeting. That weekend, feeling alone, cornered, and defeated, it finally dawned on me that there might be people willing to help me, if I were humble enough to ask and let them. Nothing (except my pride) prevented me from inviting other school “stakeholders” (students, teachers, parents, and community members) from joining this meeting. On Sunday night, I called Dorothy and asked for her help. She gave me her unqualified support and, between the two of us, we divided up a telephone tree composed of team leaders, department chairs, staff members, and administrators; asking them to join us on the night of the “tribunal”. That evening, the original, hand-picked audience of 10 denouncing parents was outnumbered and outmatched by a crowd of 30 open-minded and supportive teachers, staff members, and parents. Every outrageous slander and lie directed at me, or my staff, was challenged, countered, and contradicted with the truth by other parents, teachers, and counselors. What had started as a trial for my job, ended as a vindication of my leadership. The tide had finally turned, and within weeks of this Armageddon encounter, the three staff members would resign, and eventually be released from their positions for the following year. There would still be some emotional skirmishes at parent meetings, and an embarrassing parent demonstration in front of school that was covered by television and newspapers, but the opposition was tiny, exposed, and irrelevant and it faded away over the course of the next two years.
 

 

Looking back at my 10 years at Shangri-la MS (See Telephone Game), I would call them the most satisfying and successful professional period of my life. I fell in love with the school, and learned how to be a principal. I did not learn it from books on school management, from administrative training programs, or from a master principal – I finally learned from the people I worked with; by allowing them to help me and to influence me: assistant principals, teachers, clerks, deans, counselors (therapists), and students. They all gave me challenges, insights, and behaviors that I incorporated into my own attitudes and actions. The most important lesson was realizing that the job of principal was ABSURDLY IMPOSSIBLE. There was simply no way ONE person could assume and perform the overwhelming number of duties and responsibilities heaped upon them by parents, teachers, boards of education, superintendents, universities, state legislatures, governors, or presidents. There is no way ONE human being can do it all. Trying only leads to frustration, disillusion, or depression. The more a principal acts in the belief that they alone can perform this role in a controlling, linear fashion (“getting all their ducks in a row”), the more they will experience paradoxical consequences and unintended outcomes. I found that the more I tried to CONTROL people, choices, and events – the opposite results would occur. I became curious of this phenomenon at Fire Mountain, but it finally made sense after reading Farson’s book in Shangri-la. There I discovered that once I accepted the notion that the job was overwhelming and impossible, I was liberated to ask for help and advice, and to act in the best interest of children. I let go of the illusion of the all-controlling and all-responsible principal and focused on my IMMEDIATE (momentary) interactions with people. I concentrated on doing the RIGHT thing (being fair, honest, and caring), or not doing anything. CONTROL requires clear choices and decisive actions – even when the alternatives are bad (picking the best of the bad choices). FREEDOM from this illusion allows one the option of doing NOTHING, and letting other people, or other forces come into play. It recognizes that something, or someone greater is in control. This was illustrated for me when I stumbled into a prayer group at school. Even after my Night of Armageddon, I was never certain of the outcome of the conflict until the day I hurriedly unlocked the closed door to the Dean’s Office and discovered Magda, Antonia, Maricela, and Beatrice, four classified employees, sitting quietly in a circle. I was surprised and embarrassed. Magda just smiled and put me at ease by saying “we were praying”. I mumbled an apology for intruding, turned around, and closed the door behind me. As I paused outside, I was embraced by a sensation of such comfort and warmth, that I imagined myself being carried to bed, in the arms of my father, while pretending to be asleep in the car after a long ride home. Without another word of explanation, I KNEW what Magda and the other women were praying for; they were asking God to resolve the conflict and bring peace to Shangri-la. She knew and loved all the parties involved in this crisis and she was not picking sides; she was picking God, and beseeching him to take control. For the first time that year, I knew everything would work out fine. God was in charge, and I knew He would answer the prayers of these women. All I needed to do was concentrate on the essential interactions of my job and leave the grand strategy and future to God. Years later at a principal’s meeting, John McLaughlin (principal of Romer Middle School) reworded my description into two words: “Benign Neglect”. The job of a principal was to know what to ignore, delegate, and perform; because to do everything was impossible.
 

 

I even learned things from Caesar, one of the mutinous staff members. He had the bizarre habit of addressing each student as “SIR” or “MISS” and shaking their hands before transacting his business with them. The students thought it an odd and eccentric behavior, but I was intrigued. I had always toyed with the idea of trying to learn the names of every student in the school, but had been intimidated by the vast enrollment at Fire Mountain MS (over 2,000 students). Shangri-la was smaller in comparison, and its enrollment of 1100 offered me the possibility of getting close to this impossible dream. All I needed was a means to practice and the willingness to make mistakes and appear “silly” to middle school children. Slight adjustments to Caesar’s quirky habit gave me the perfect vehicle to greet, meet, and interact with students on a daily basis, AND learn their names. I could do it before school, during Nutrition and Lunch, and after school. The practice allowed me to look into their faces, and acknowledge each student I encountered every day. When I could not recall their names (and saw the fading of their smiles), I simply went to Plan B: asking them to help me remember by giving me a clue – the first letter of their name. I would usually guess the correct name after one or two tries; or finally give up and ask them to tell me. By that time the student would be laughing and appear to believe me when I would exclaim, “Of course! I knew that; now I remember!” This simple ritual calibrated my perspective each morning as I stood in front of school shaking hands and reciting names, by reminding me who was important and who made my job enjoyable. It also had unexpected, and beneficial side effects. Parents and neighbors called, or sent unsolicited emails and letters, saying how much they appreciated and were comforted by the sight of a principal, standing in front of school, shaking hands, and greeting every child by name every morning and afternoon. Students, parents, and teachers came to believe that I had mastered an IMPOSSIBLE task and memorized the names of every child at Shangri-la M.S. I had made the impossible seem possible.
 

 

In 2005, I was informed by my District Director that the Superintendent wished to assign me to Mash M.S., a school that was recovering from a State intervention, and a District take-over and reconstitution. The school was coming off of a four-year, transformational effort to revive its program of instruction and insure consistent student achievement. The Superintendent was now looking for a veteran principal to replace the “transforming” principal, stabilize the school, and assure that the more mundane District policies, guidelines, and practices were also in place. My first response was “What if I don’t accept?”

She gave me a bemused smile and replied “Would you rather take over Sherman High School?”

Suddenly, a nightmarish vision of trying to direct that large, comprehensive high school, which was caught in the throws of violent ethnic confrontation and conflict between Hispanic and Middle-eastern students, made Mash MS a much more appealing alternative. I gathered from my options that I did not really have a choice; so after an upbeat conversation with the exiting principal hearing the reasons why I should accept, and discussing the offer with Kathy, I called my director and said “yes”.
 

 

In my third year at Mash MS, I finally awoke one day, looking into the faces of the children I continued to greet, shake their hands, and learn their names, and realized that they were all mine. I recognized every one (or felt I did), but more importantly they all recognized me. I’d spent the first two years of my assignment being very objective, very aloof, and very professional. That was easy, because I was now “an old hand” at my job, and the teachers, staff, and students at this school were strangers. I’d finally become “the old man” assigned to a refitted Man-ó-War, on one last voyage; the grizzled old sea captain who had made the hazardous trip “around the horn” so often, he could do it in his sleep. Piloting a school was no longer difficult, because I’d learned not to provoke personal animosities, and to see that every problem has a finite number of steps towards a resolution. The consequences of my actions might be unpleasant, but the decisions were obvious, if one has faced the same situations semester after semester for 14 years. Mash MS was FILLED with dilemmas (see tag, MASH); but I didn’t panic or despair, because I was secure in my abilities to handle any issue, conflict, or controversy “by the numbers”, without investing feelings or emotions. This emotional detachment was heightened by my anger and resentment over my assignment to Mash M.S. I grieved the loss of Shangri-la; the friends I’d made, the people I’d worked with, the teachers I had hired, and the students I had left behind. I had not allowed one person at Mash into that private place of trust and confidence which had been occupied by so many people at Shangri-la. I refused to find them worthy – until Bluestone walked into my office one day in May, and slapped me out of my stupor by announcing “Tony, I’m here to help you; and I have the solution to your problems!”
 


 

Bluestone was a retired counselor who had worked at Mash MS all of her educational career in Los Angeles. I first met her in 1989, when I was assigned there as an Assistant Principal. She was an amazingly energetic, loving and passionate mother-sister-aunt-friend, and counselor, who could look right through a person and know if they were fake or authentic. She was devoted to the students at the school (especially the most at-risk and hardest to love), and acted as their personal advisor and advocate. However, she won my admiration and respect because she balanced her compassion with maturity, professionalism, and a hard-nose grasp of the realities of life. She knew what the future held in store for these kids if they did not make better choices, and she offered them faith and opportunities to succeed.  She remained at Mash long after I left, and we would reconnect by chance or when one of her kids needed assistance, and I could help. Our friendship intertwined again when I discovered that Marty, my friend and counselor at Shangri-la (see Last Graduation at Shangri-la) was also her good friend from their days as IMPACT coordinators. That is when I learned of the similarities they shared: they were musicians and artists, they loved their respective schools and students (especially the outcasts and misfits); and they were practical counselors who deserved support. Now that Bluestone had recovered from a long illness, she looked strong and healthy again. I couldn’t help but smile at her well-meaning intentions as she explained that Marty had told her that I was looking for people who really loved the school and its kids, the way he and Kandy loved the students at Shangri-la. So, she had come to offer her services as a counselor, coordinator, and change agent. I was on the verge of turning her down, after pretending to listen, and dismissing her with the platitude “Well, thanks for sharing Blue, I’ll get back to you on this”; when I stopped. What was I doing? My sense of the absurd, which had lain dormant these two years, flared up. I sensed that this offer, while crazy, was a nexus point, a crossroad of choices that had far-reaching ramifications. I could choose the safe and conventional route, dismiss Blue and continue leading Mash M.S. as I was, in a haze of bitterness and detachment, or I could take a leap of faith with a person who truly loved these students and this school. That is when I woke up and realized that they had become my kids too. There was really only one road to choose; the “wrong” one, because it would paradoxically achieve the “right” goal. I hired Bluestone on the spot, not worrying about the rationale, the obstacles, or the contractual difficulties that would follow. The very next week, POSITIVE things started to happen. An elemental force had been unleashed at Mash MS, an energy the school had lacked for 5 years was alive – and it came in the color blue.
 

 
 My third year at Mash MS was an eye-popping and joyous experience, and it finally allowed me the chance to witness people coalescing and creating a rebirth of enthusiasm, accountability, and effort. My administrative team gelled with the addition of two new assistant principals from high schools. The Special Education Office became a hub of friendly and constructive interactions between the psychologist, coordinators, and A.P.’s The Dean’s and Counseling Offices started collaborating in their work, and student referrals, suspensions, and transfers dropped. Most importantly, the teachers, who had been stunned by the abysmal student scores on the California Standards Test and the school’s Academic Performance Index (see API Blues), were able to re-focus their instructional efforts and take advantage of the Class Size Reduction program which called for a 25-to-1, student-to-teacher ratio in academic classrooms. Not only did the teachers grasp the urgency for improvement, but they insisted on closer accountability for student progress and lobbied for subject matter testing by academic classes. I could not account for this wave of positive feelings and attitude, and found myself “knocking on wood” whenever I blurted out what a sweet year we were having. This is not to say that there weren’t emergencies, problems, and headaches (we had a rash of Child Abuse allegations, a student rape, and the trauma of reconfiguring the students, teachers, and staff into a traditional, single track format, after 17 years on a year-round schedule) – but none of them paralyzed the school. It was a great year, and I let myself savor and enjoy it, right up to the last handshake of the last student at graduation.

 

Before our summer vacation, Kathy and I went to our first STRS (State Teacher’s Retirement System) counseling session in June. Prior to that meeting we had tipped-toed around the topic of my retirement; not really certain if it was financially feasible. Although more and more of my generation of principals and A.P.’s were retiring – I’d always suspected they were economically better prepared than I for that inevitability. So I was glad that Kathy came along to evaluate the information we received together. To our surprise, the calculations for retirement at 61 years of age, with 32 years of service (increasing to 33 with illness days added) were optimal. Kathy was with me when we realized that I could retire on June 30, 2009. If I chose, this would be my farewell tour, my last year as principal. All I needed to do was pull the trigger.

 

I felt the first real loosening of the ties that bound me to my career as I looked out on the playing fields of Pierpont Elementary, and the sea beyond it, from the second story window of our beach house in Ventura. There was no envy, but some curiosity about its principals remained. I no longer cared about the facilities; they were just quaint buildings in a scenic vacation town. I did still wonder how the principals who had worked there described their jobs. Was it challenging for them, stressful, satisfying, or fun? My career odyssey had never been fun. For me, being a principal had been WORK – and work is hard. Work is painful to learn, painful to perfect, and painful to appreciate. My satisfaction came from knowing that I could finally perform the work well. I enjoyed it most, when I shared the experience with teachers, counselors, coordinators, deans, and co-administrators who seemed to have FUN doing what they loved. They are the artists I love to watch and appreciate. I experienced some of my greatest joys at Shangri-la, but I could now see the wisdom of my transfer. Over 10 years, my relationships with many teachers, administrators, and staff members had subtly shifted in their favor (or against them), so that my objectivity became difficult. They were friends as well as employees, and that emotional connection tended to prejudice my actions. My assignment to Mash MS freed me from that professional conflict and allowed me to be totally and completely on their side. I also felt good about my work at Mash. I enjoyed working with the A.P.’s, coordinators, psychologist, counselors, and teachers as we tackled serious problems and solved silly dilemmas. However, gazing out at the glistening sea and its far horizon, I couldn’t help feeling that there was something MORE out there. I had plotted a career route towards being a good principal, and I think that destination was reached at Shangri-la and Mash Middle Schools. Now it was time for something NEW – and possibly, something DIFFERENT. I guess that was when I decided to retire and move on; to find out what it is.


dedalus_1947: (Default)
You have to put off being young
until you can retire.
(Unknown)
 
The thoughtful soul,
To solitude retires.
(Omar Khayyam, Persian poet)
 
The stucco structures reflected the sun’s brightness with double intensity, and the luminous biege of the walls contrasted sharply with the deep burgundy tiles that lined the roofs. Sky blue-painted eaves, window frames, and doors muted and softened the light, allowing the eyes to gently glide toward the dark green lawns of the playing field and garden courtyard. It was like looking at a timeless, still-life painting of a simple sandstone vase with handpicked crimson, blue, and green spring flowers, highlighted with a spray of mimosa. One would never expect a school to be adorned in such vibrant colors, and yet here it was. A modernist impression of a pocket-sized World War II gymnasium, cafeteria, and classrooms; a seaside academy, a small school nestled a mere stones throw from the edge of the Pacific Ocean in Ventura, California. My first thoughts, when I saw Pierpoint Elementary School in 2002 were, “I wonder if we could buy a house here, because I’d love being the principal of this school”. I visualized myself walking out of my office, if I felt annoyed or frustrated by a problem or worry, and being refreshed when facing the fresh salty breezes coming off the beach and sand dunes. If I positioned myself just right, I could see the sparkling shimmer of the sea. From this distance, the ocean looks like painted dabs of twinkling light. The water gives off this glimmering effect at about 4 o’clock – when the sun is beginning its western descent, and most students have left the school. Working there would be a meditation, surrounded by soothing and tranquil sights and sounds. I envied the principal. I’ve lived and vacationed near or on the beach many times in my life, and I always longed to work in a seaside community. I remember making this same wish when I saw other schools in California: San Juan Capistrano, Venice, Santa Monica, Santa Barbara, Carmel, Monterey, and San Francisco. I never saw a seaside school I didn’t want to work at; until this year. This was the summer when the wishing stopped.
 
 

I always wondered how I would know when it was the right time to retire. When does a school administrator, especially a principal, know when they have had enough? What makes them decide? I remember posing a question like this to a newly retired elementary principal in 1985, when I was 39 and just promoted to my first assistant principal (AP) position at Flamenco High School. I was introduced to him by his wife, the coordinator of a continuing education program, who was recruiting me to teach a multi-cultural awareness class for post-graduate credit. I was still radiating pride and excitement from my new role as assistant principal, and I was eagerly quizzing veteran administrators to learn as much as possible. “What made you retire?” was my innocent question, after shaking hands. I was honestly curious, because he looked too young, fresh, and vital to be retired. I imagined retirees to be wizened, exhausted old people who barely had the energy to walk. This man looked like he had just stepped off the schoolyard from lunch supervision, having broken up a fight, played basketball with 6th graders, and was making mental preparations for a music assembly at 2 o’clock. He looked me up and down, reflecting for a moment on my query, and simply replied, “It stopped being fun”. No explanations and no illustrations were offered; just that it was no longer fun. He then changed the subject by asking me about my upcoming class. I continued talking, but I was a little confused by what I thought was a frivolous answer. I wanted to learn and he was talking about FUN. What kind of an answer was that? Fun! How was being a principal fun? Becoming an outstanding principal was the Holy Grail of my ambitions; what did it have to do with being fun? It wasn’t a game or sport! Did principals really retire when they stopped having FUN? His answer made no sense to me. In fact, I was so annoyed by the response, I asked my own principal about it, the following day.
 
Anne was a slender, white-haired, chiseled-faced, veteran principal with three successful assignments on her resume. She had completed her doctoral degree, worked as a middle school principal for 4 years, completed a difficult stint as an administrative legal advisor in Staff Relations for another 2, and was now being rewarded with a plum assignment to a high profile, high achieving high school. She was esteemed as a clear-headed, intelligent, and fair administrator. It was also whispered to me by various female professional friends that Anne was one of the seven assistant principals who had challenged the school district by suing the Board of Education for gender discrimination in their promotional practices. The insurgent women won the suit, and forced the district to promote more women principals in secondary schools. It was a testament to her talents that she was one of the first chosen. I respected her abilities, advice, and opinions, and was grateful that she became my career mentor. She did not share my annoyance with the retired principal. She thought for a bit and said, “Hmmm that’s an interesting way to put it. Fun – I don’t think I’d use that particular word to characterize the job of principal. I think rewarding or satisfying would be my choice”. She laughed when she saw the look on my face. “I’m not helping you much with my answer, am I? Look buster”, she chided me, “don’t worry about it. Every principal describes the work they do in different ways. Why do they retire? I don’t know. I suppose I’ll find out when it’s my time”. It sounded like sage advice, which I didn’t understand at the time. I nodded and said thank you, but the retired principal’s response bothered me, and I never forgot it.
 
 
I served as an AP for 6 more years at three schools (one high school and two middle schools) before I was promoted to principal. Looking back, those years were the hardest, most challenging, and most stimulating years of my professional life. I was constantly learning, exploring new experiences, searching and sharing information, making connections with people at the district and state levels, and interacting with professional friends and other assistant principals. The conceit among AP’s in Los Angeles, during the 80’s and 90’s, was that we were the best and the brightest in the state, and we engaged in a friendly competition to see which of us had “The Right Stuff” to be principals first. We were convinced that we were getting smarter, more experienced, and better able to handle any emergency or dilemma. We were ambitious and eager, but the top contenders were the ones who realized that they couldn’t learn it all, and they had to depend on other people who were older, smarter and more experienced. I thought it was an obvious lesson, but I was surprised by how many AP’s continued to think (or pretend) that they could do it all. The best part of my job was observing the 4 principals I worked for as they managed their schools and dealt with school problems, emergencies, and employees. I had a particular set of duties and responsibilities, but my overarching imperative was to research issues, solve problems, and support the principal. However, the principals had to shoulder ALL the school’s problems, worry about ALL the ramifications, and ALWAYS make the “right” decisions. I left my duties at school at the end of the day; the principals carried theirs around all the time. I learned from each principal I worked with; the ones I liked, the ones I feared, and the ones I tolerated. I learned from their successes and their failures (more from the failures), and after six years I impatiently believed that I was ready to match, or surpass them. I was restless and arrogant; and I was wrong. Nothing adequately prepared me for the actual experience of being a principal. It had to be lived and survived to be understood.
 
This year I turn 61, and as I look around at the administrative landscape of the district I see that all my former principals and the generation of assistant principals who were promoted in 1991 are gone. I have been in the district for 32 years, seventeen as a principal at three middle schools (not counting a brief stint as an “acting principal” at a fourth). Each assignment has been different from the one before, and my feeling toward each varies. I would guess that I am now about the age, if not older, of the retired principal I questioned in 1985. I have never forgotten my conversation with him, and each year, in every new location, I asked myself the question, “Am I having fun, yet?” I can honestly reply that I have never described the work I do as FUN. The excitement and eagerness of my first school, Fire Mountain Middle School (MS), dissipated in six months. The joy of being transferred to Shangri-la MS lasted one year, and I didn’t relax in my latest location, Mash MS, until after two years. Fun was never a criterion that measured the job or my performance. If I were pressed to characterize the job or role of principal, I’d use a metaphor and describe it as a voyage of exploration and discovery, on a treacherous sea. In 17 years, I’ve learned more about ME and my human and spiritual needs, than the mechanics of leadership, or how to increase student achievement.
 
 
At my first school, I fervently believed that the job of principal was manageable, if one had the “right” Vision, Mission, and leadership style. I also believed that I had the time to learn and command these skills, because I had 24 hours each day and 7 days each week. The trick was finding the techniques and strategies that produced the desired results. It was simple, right? Wrong! After a six month grace period, I learned that KNOWING the right course of action and practicing the corresponding leadership behaviors to achieve it did not always produce the desired result. In fact, most times it had the opposite effect when adult and personal agendas and interests got in the way. I learned that every decision and action by a principal is personal to the individual affected by it. Changing teachers’ classroom assignments to cluster students and interdisciplinary teams into discrete geographical locations on a middle school campus may be theoretically sound, and supported by research and district policies, but when it resulted in the union representative’s classroom being changed, it became a declaration of war. The next three years were a Cold War conflict, with constant posturing and brinksmanship between the three spheres of power and influence in the school: teachers (the union rep), management (me), and the parents (the Community Representative). It was a period of shifting loyalties, self-serving alliances, and betrayals. A teacher who had served as a Navy Seal in the Vietnam conflict once called me “The Old Man” of Fire Mountain, using the nickname that sailors give the captain of their ship. I told him that I was still too “green” to deserve the honorific, although images of Captain Bligh from Mutiny on the Bounty and Captain Queeg of The Caine Mutiny did cross my mind. The only practices that seemed to produce beneficial results were those directed at spiritual peace: jogging, meditation and attending daily mass at a church on my way to school. Even though they did not end the dull pains that developed in my back, neck, and chest, during times of confrontation and stress, these practices did provide a momentary respite. At the end of my first full year at Fire Mountain, I tried to resign and petitioned John Leichty, the Director of Middle Schools, to reinstate me as an AP at another school.  I didn’t feel I was doing a good job. He said he knew of the hardships I was facing, but believed I was being too critical of myself; he told me I was doing a fine job for a freshman principal, and that the situation would only improve with time. I trusted his confidence, continued going to 6:20 mass, and remained in the position until he transferred me to Shangri-la MS after two more years.
 
In Shangri-la, I attacked the challenge of effective leadership with renewed vigor and dedication. It was a smaller school, with fewer students, a stable and experienced administrative team and faculty, and was only 25 minutes away from home (Fire Mountain was a two to three hour round trip). Hoping to avoid my freshman mistakes, I put greater emphasis on collaboration, making a concerted effort to meet, get to know, and build consensus among my administrative team and the natural leaders in the faculty and parent organizations. I tried being extra careful and respectful of their feelings, because I had walked into a leadership vacuum, with the previous principal having abandoned the school at mid-year on a medical leave when a parent organization and some teachers began agitating for her removal. However, I still believed that the job was manageable, and that I just had to work harder, longer, and more efficiently to find the “right” vision and system to be effective and get results. For the first time as principal, I was happy. The first year was a textbook case of what new principals are supposed to do, and how teachers and parents are supposed to react. It was a honeymoon period that allowed the teachers, counselors, and administrators to know me, and I them. The situation was so idyllic that I ignored the ominous clouds of disaffection that a few people were pointing to, believing that, having survived Fire Mountain, I could weather any storm. In my sophomore year at Shangri-la I confronted the power of one; how one frustrated and angry coordinator (with 2 allies), feeling unappreciated, undervalued, and threatened, could generate sufficient parent support and media coverage to ALMOST oust a principal. I learned the consequences of hubris, the wisdom of asking for help and advice, and the absurdity of school management.
 
 
(To be continued)
dedalus_1947: (Default)
"The days of the pure whites, the victors of today,
are as numbered as were the days of their predecessors.
Having fulfilled their destiny of mechanizing the world,
they themselves have set, without knowing it,
the basis for the new period:
the period of the fusion and the mixing of all peoples."
(The Cosmic Race by José Vasconcelos)
 
“Kathy”, I called out towards the family room, “did you read Toñito’s blog?”
“Yes” she said. The emotional blandness of her reply, and the utter silence that followed, confused me.
“Then why didn’t you say something about it after you finished?” I called back, shaking my head as I looked again at the glowing document on the screen before me.
“Because”, she said quietly, miraculously materializing by my side, “I read it while you were writing, and there is no point trying to interrupt when you’re in that zone. I figured you’d read it soon enough”.
“You’re right”, I admitted, knowing how I tune out the world when writing a crucial paragraph or phrase; “but I can’t believe this!” I pointed at the blog I had just read by my son, titled IBARW: Red and Green and Mostly White (International Blog against Racism Week).
“I know; I’m stunned too” she added. “Obviously he sees huge gaps in his upbringing, especially about his ethnicity. What are you going to do?” That was an interesting question; not ‘what do you think?’, but ‘what are you going to do?’ I looked up at her, searching for a hint of accusation on her face, but her expression conveyed only uncertainty and confusion, not anger or impatience.
“I don’t know” I said, stalling for more time as I tried making sense out of the blog. “Let me read it again”. Accepting my delay, Kathy left me alone in the computer room. I stared at the screen for a long time, but the words did not register in my brain. I did not want to read it a second time; I did not want to re-experience the jolts of guilt and disillusion that first rocked me. I needed to sort out my thoughts and feelings before I reacted. What was I to do? My first impulse was to ignore the article and pretend that I never read it. That won’t work, I said to myself. Kathy read it and she won’t rest until it is resolved in some way. Something had to be done. If Tony’s blog WAS a parental indictment for past omissions, there were more counts against me than Kathy. Although this was OUR problem, I had to decide on my own course of action. I got up from my chair and left the computer room with the blog still shining on the screen. Following Kathy into the family room, I said “I’m not going to do anything right now. There is too much stuff going though my head. I’m not sure what I feel, or what Tony is saying. I’m going to sleep on it for now, and read it again tomorrow. What about you; what are you going to do?”
“I’d like to talk to him right now”, she replied, “but I don’t know what to say; I just know I have to respond. Maybe your right; I’ll wait too”.
With our immediate responses postponed, we surrendered into our confusion for a moment and verbalized some random thoughts.
“Kath”, I said, “I can’t believe we blew it with the kids. I thought we talked about these things all through their childhood. Do you remember the incident he mentions in the blog?”
“No I don’t” she replied, “but I’m sure that the comment Tony remembers making would have received a clear response from me or you. We could not have allowed those remarks to go by unchallenged”.
“It’s a scene at the periphery of my memory”, I mused; “but it feels so familiar. I’m positive we said something, too. Let’s sleep on it; it may make more sense tomorrow”.
 
Writing in my daily journal the next morning gave me a chance to spontaneously reflect on Tony’s blog, without the emotional barriers of the night before. I just wrote, not attempting to analyze, filter, or edit my thoughts. I would make sense of these spontaneous notations later; but it was important that I take action and put my reactions on paper before I got stuck over-thinking the proper course. As I wrote, it became apparent that Toñito’s blog revolved around three questions: 1) why don’t I have a clear awareness and knowledge of my Mexican family’s ethnic heritage? 2) Why weren’t my sister and I raised bilingually? 3) What happened when as a child I made a thoughtless, pejorative remark about Mexicans in the car? I answered these questions as honestly as I could, knowing they would require further rewriting and editing (I don’t often write formal pieces in my journal, but it does act as an effective device to jump-start stories, essays, and speeches that I develop later). The act of writing released my guarded feelings over Tony’s public airing of his personal questions and helped me detect a hint of anguish in them. Kathy and I were his only source for answers and relief. I expanded on these morning reflections during my lunch break at a principals’ meeting, and produced a fairly complete draft by evening. That night, when Kathy brought up the topic of how we might respond to Toñito’s blog, I asked her to read my initial composition. She was satisfied with the results, telling me that it seemed to address all the main points. While talking more about it, I also explained my idea that his blog was not an indictment of our parenting practices, but, rather, a plea to help him clarify his own ethnic self-identity. I believed that Tony, at the age of 30, was embarking on an Identity Quest, and we were instrumental in his first steps. Over the course of the next 24 hours, Kathy helped me craft a final “comment” to Tony’s article that we posted the evening of the Opening Ceremonies of the China Olympics. A few days later, I received an email notice that a new comment to Tony’s IBARW posting had appeared. I was surprised to see that Prisa, without any prompting from us, had taken the unusual step of reading and responding to Tony blog as well (I wasn’t aware that she even read his blog). We heard nothing further, until Tony posted a new entry on his blog, in which he mentioned our two responses, and linked the reader to the original IBARW piece (see IBARWRAGAMW). A week later, we finally had the chance to discuss this matter face to face.
 

To our delight, Tony continues to participate in the Liturgy of the Word at Sunday mass by reading one or both of the two scripture selections. Dramatic interpretation had always been his special talent since children’s theatre, so it was natural for Kathy to suggest that he volunteer as a Lector at our parish church. He has been reading once a month since his college days. We make a point of attending that mass and then treating him and Jonaya to breakfast; it’s a great way to keep in touch and up-to-date on family news. He was reading on August 17th, but I went alone that day, because Kathy had come down with a severe cold and Jonaya, his fiancé, was unable to attend. The Readings were a little disappointing, and even Tony’s dramatic energy could not breathe meaning into Paul’s short scolding in Romans 11:13. The Gospel, on the other hand, got my full attention. The selection from Mathew 15:21, described a pagan Canaanite parent who persisted in beseeching the assistance of Christ in saving her child from demonic torments. The parent would not give up, despite the rejections and insults from the Galilean disciples, until Jesus finally relented, declaring “O woman, great is your faith! Let it be done as you wish”. And the child was healed. The messages I gained from the gospel were that prayers are ALWAYS answered (even if we can’t see their obvious manifestations), and that Christ’s compassion IS guaranteed; God, the all-loving parent, will ALWAYS heed and assist the pleas and needs of his children. This is a recurring theme in the gospels; God, the loving father, the compassionate parent, who will ALWAYS listen, accept, help, love, and forgive his children. I’ve always wondered if Jesus used the metaphor of a loving parent as a sign of God’s covenant of Love, Compassion, and Forgiveness, or as a model for all parents and people to emulate and practice. I suppose it works on both levels, as metaphors should. At the conclusion of mass, I met Tony by the Baptismal Font and we agreed to go to the Deli for breakfast. Oddly enough, despite the tensions and drama caused by Tony’s blog and our crafted response, it did not occur to me until I drove there that I finally had a chance to talk about it. Approaching the entrance doorway, I suddenly became nervous and thought, how will I bring it up? Should we first chat about other things, or do I just get to the point? After I gave him a hug by the side of our table, I suddenly erupted with “So Tony that was quite a blog, would you like to talk about it?”
“Sure” he replied.
 
We circled around the topic at first, not knowing just where to begin. I started by questioning him about what he wanted to know, and he tried explaining the areas where he lacked information. Tony said that the issue first came up with International Blog against Racism Week. In formulating a response about being White and Mexican, he realized that he didn’t know, or couldn’t remember very much about his family history, or ethnic identity. My first stab at answering was to say that Kathy and I believed that color was never an issue and that he and Prisa were Americans of split Mexican and Irish descent. In teaching them about their ethnic backgrounds, we practiced “The teachable moment”. We used calendar dates (e.g. March 17, April 24, May 5, September 16, December 8, and December 24) to inculcate national and religious holidays that carried ethnic significance (Feast of Saint Patrick, Easter Rising, defeat of the French Army, Independence from Spain, Feast of the Virgen de Guadalupe, and the observance of Noche Buena); and we took advantage of opportune moments in the children’s elementary and high school years (places and situations), to introduce and explain racial attitudes, and ethnic pride. The pejorative remarks he made in the car about Mexicans would have been one of those teachable moments.
 
 
“Do you recall that scene, Dad?” Tony asked when the waitress interrupted to bring us our food.
“Yes I do”, I replied, “but surprisingly, your mother doesn’t. I remember her shooting me the look you described in your blog across the car. It seemed to scream ‘What are you going to do?’ But she knew exactly what to say. She wasn’t going to let that moment slip by without pointing out the errors of stereotyping by color or racial features. We both had something to say, and I clearly remember asking you if you understood what we were trying to tell you”.
“How old do you think I was?”
“I visualize it happening while I was driving along Topanga Canyon Boulevard. I’d guess that you were in the 5th grade”.  
 
It was here that Tony redirected my talk, by saying that he was familiar with the historical dates I mentioned and their significance, but he lacked specific knowledge about his deceased Mexican-American grandfather, Mexican great-grandparents, and their offspring scattered throughout Los Angeles. He did not know how they came to America, how they lived, and what they experienced in California. This clarification gave me pause, because I had never thought of mentioning these topics during his childhood. Except for on official reunion in 2001, Toñito  and Prisa had no contact or interaction with the aunts, uncles, and cousins in my father’s family. Tony’s sudden interest in a personal family history of how my Mexican grandparents and their offspring assimilated into America, and how they interacted with “white”, Anglo-Americans, caught me by surprise.
 
“I think I see what you want to know”, I said, nodding my head. “That’s more information than I can give you in one sitting. Since my father’s death in 1971, when I was 23, I slowly separated more and more from his family. With the deaths of my grandparents, contacts became even more infrequent and eventually stopped altogether. By then, I had my own family to care for, and we only socialized with your immediate grandparents and your aunts, uncles, and cousins. I can give you a brief synopsis from my own perspective. Is that alright for now?”
“Sure” he replied. So, as we began eating, I told an abbreviated version of a family saga that went something like this:
 
Color was never an ethnically defining feature for me. As an infant I learned that language and birthplace were the weights that anchored Hispanics to their specific nationality; not the color of their skins. Latinos come in all colors. Complexions of every hue and shade were present in my father’s Mexican-American family in Los Angeles, and my mother’s family in Mexico. I had grandparents, uncles, aunts, and cousins with complexions that ranged from dark chocolate, through creamy bronze, to alabaster white. This spectrum of features surrounded me in my infancy in Mexico, through my childhood in the Lincoln Heights and the Silver Lake areas of Los Angeles. It was not until 1960 that I became aware that Americans used color to identify all racial types and ethnic groups, and treated the darker ones as inferior. Color and ethnicity became an issue when we left the central and eastside urban areas of the city and moved to Venice Beach on the Westside. Venice in the 60’s was a wonderfully diverse community, containing a pocket Mexican barrio (Rose Avenue) and a Black ghetto (Oakwood). The Catholic school I attended in the 6th grade had a student population of all ethnicities, colors, and nationalities. The unifying factors among students were our age, grade, sports, religion, and ethnic pride. My parents had taken great pains to expose and indoctrinate us about Mexican history, culture, and the arts throughout our lives, and they had inculcated a great sense of ethnic pride. I was as proud of being Mexican as my Irish and Italian friends were of their ancestral nations. However, since my surname was a Latin-based word that ended in “o”, and Tony was my name, classmates (and their parents) assumed that my family and I were Italians. When I told them that we were Mexican, they became defiant and argumentative, refusing to believe me and telling me that Mexicans were brown or red. The only factor that finally reconciled them to our usual status (White Mexican!) was my ability to speak Spanish. When I mentioned this color identification to my parents, my mother became indignant and dismissed it as stereotypic tonterías (foolishness). They told me to ignore it; but my younger relatives in Lincoln Heights and East L.A. could not. These aunts, uncles, and cousins, were darker than I, and they were much more sensitive to the color discrimination by white Americans, and the inferiority it conferred on Mexicans. My Uncle Charlie and Aunts Espy and Lisa were my most reliable sources of teenage information. They attended high school and would soon be entering college. They were hipper, cooler, and more willing to ‘clue me in’ on ‘things you need to know’. They were the young adults who first explained and taught me the slag words, put-downs, and curse words that I could use as retaliatory weapons to taunting and bullying in after school playgrounds and parks. They also identified the ethnic and racial pejoratives that could enflame anger and ignite conflict: ‘beaner, wet-back, greaser, spics, mick, paddy, wop, dago, nigger, and spook’. These labels and their impact on people were my first clue into the simmering ethnic cauldron of anger and dissatisfaction that was boiling in Watts and brewing into a Chicano identity in East L.A. One would explode in violence in 1965 with the Watts Riots, and the other in the civil defiance of the Chicano Student Walkouts in 1968.
 
 
Because of my white skin and geographical isolation on the Westside, I was far removed from the effects of the Civil Rights Movement among the more alienated young people of color living in South Central and East Los Angeles. It didn’t exist in my world of Pop Warner Football, high school academics, sports, dating, and college. I remember watching the smoke rising over our Saturday soccer practice at Loyola University during the summer before my senior year in high school in 1965, not understanding the kind of anger that makes someone burn their community down around them. I was also oblivious to the rise of the Black and Brown Power Movements, and their evolution into the Black Panther Party, the Brown Berets, and La Raza Unida Party. These were names I heard on the news, read in Time and Life magazines, and would mention at the dinner table. My parents, Depression children, wartime adults, and solid Republicans, dismissed these movements as the actions of a few disaffected radicals and socialists, and advised me to discount them. As I graduated from high school and entered UCLA, I was still comfortable in my notion of being a fully assimilated, 2nd generation Mexican-American (on my father’s side), and quite content to agree with my parents. The only vulnerability in this armor of complacency was my Eastside uncle and aunts. They were living in and listening to the rumblings of this socio-political awakening, and they kept me informed. They were never strident or confrontational, but they were a constant reminder that something unusual was happening among the young Mexican-Americans in the barrios of Los Angeles that I could not ignore.
 
The Chicano Movement was a student initiated socio-political movement in the American Southwest in the late 60’s and 70’s. It started where the early legal and political action groups that arose with the campaign of John Kennedy, the first Catholic president, left off. Their issues centered on civil rights, equal access to education, social justice, and bilingual/biculturalism. Hispanic Americans did not have the local agencies that existed in Black communities in the form of churches and activist ministers. However, they did have a large baby boom generation of high school and college students who had heard their veteran father’s speak of World War II, the GI Bill, and the promise that they would reap the political, economic, and educational benefits of their efforts and sacrifice. More and more Mexican-American students were being admitted into state colleges and universities (especially as a result of the Civil Rights Movement and the Affirmative Action programs enacted during the Johnson Administration), and they used that perspective to look back at the high schools they came from and began questioning the complacency, discrimination, and inequities, that were practiced by well meaning board members, administrators, and teachers. Organizing themselves into on-campus student organizations in high schools, colleges, and universities, these students decided to act against the most accessible symbols and agents of their alienation – the schools themselves. The first orchestrated act of civil disobedience occurred in East Los Angeles with the Chicano Student Walkouts, in March of 1968. Mexican-American high school students, who in defiance of acceptable practice, adopted the derogatory term for the sons and daughters of Mexican immigrants, “Chicanos”, and broke the law by walking out of their schools in Boyle Heights and Lincoln Heights, in protest to the inadequacies of their school facilities, curriculum, counseling, and graduation rates. The after-shocks of this high school, civil disorder, reached across the city to the suburban slopes of Westwood and knocked me out of my Westside complacency to bring on a full scale identity crisis. The Chicano Movement forced me to ask questions about myself and my place in this Anglo-American society. It challenged me to look at myself and ask the questions - who was I and whom did I serve? Was I a hyphenated-American in an assimilated, white world, or a person who did not fit, a new man who was neither all- white in the American way, nor all-Hispanic in the Mexican way; but someone new and different? The term “Chicano” afforded me a temporary, safe harbor, because it was the defiant declaration of an ethnically independent man who was neither Anglo-American nor Mexican. Until that moment, I had been happy as a history major concentrating on Mexican and Latin American history; from hence I would spend the next 7 years seeking a Chicano identity. The questing stopped when I married and had children, because I gave them my full attention. During those seven years, I attended school in Mexico twice, took a graduate degree at UCLA in Latin American Studies, and enrolled in Chicano Studies classes. I even taught Chicano History for 2 years at Santa Monica College.
 
 
“I think I better stop for now” I said, bringing my long monologue to an end. I felt I had talked too much already.
“Thanks, Dad”, Tony said, leaning back from the table. “I never knew any of that”.
“Your welcome”, I replied. “I never knew it was that important to you. You know, there is still much more to tell. We need to have more conversations like this. Now, as for your question about bilingualism - I tried to address it in my blog response. But I’m curious, when did speaking Spanish become so important? You took it in high school for 2 years, and you never seemed excited about it. I thought you were simply humoring me; especially when I would carry full-on conversations with you in Spanish, after picking you up from school”.
Tony paused for a while, and said “Jonaya and I are thinking of bringing up our children bilingually. You see, in all likelihood, for the first time in this family, our children will LOOK Mexican. With their darker skin, and Hispanic surname, their ability to speak Spanish will immediately ground them ethnically and spare them a lot of ridiculous questions and speculations from white, Anglo-Americans. I want to give them a strong sense of identity and pride. Jonaya and I have are in agreement on this, and we plan to do it”.
 
 
Well that explained it. Now I could see what had prompted Toñito’s blog and the questions about ethnicity, bilingualism, and family history. He was anticipating the issues that might arise when raising children of color from three ethnic groups; white Irish, brown/red/or yellow Mexican, and black African. We spent the next 30 minutes over breakfast talking about the more immediate family events and activities, and then Tony left to drop in on his mother before heading home. On my own drive home, it occurred to me that Toñito  was indeed beginning a quest. The prospect of multi-racial children had challenged him to seek answers to new questions about where he came from, who he was, and what would his children need? It was a quest that I had begun, but never completed. What help could I provide now? Of course I could continue answering his questions about family history, but quests are not about knowing – they are about learning. In Parzival, the archetypal tale by Wolfram Von Eschenbach, the young hero-knight, Percival, goes in search of the Sangreal, the Holy Grail. The quest is achieved NOT by acquisition of an object or a goal, but by learning the 2 questions that must be asked: “What is the secret of the Grail?” and “Whom does it serve?” It is only in the heartfelt asking of these two questions, from a compassionate, yearning desire to help others, that Christ’s “precious blood” (sangreal) is released and the wasteland of our lives is nourished and allowed to flower.
 
 
As I drove into the garage, I couldn’t help but think of one more piece of advice I would give Toñito – to read Jose Vasconcelos’ treatise called The Cosmic Race. In my own quest in search of identity, I discovered that Vasconcelos, a Mexican philosopher at the time of the Revolution, proposed the theory that America offered the world a potential gift beyond value – the opportunity for the melding (mestizaje) of a new race, “The Cosmic Race”, born from the mixture of  the 3 primary races (African, Asian, and White). Tony and Jonaya’s offspring would be those cosmic children, and my grandchildren.
 

 
dedalus_1947: (Default)
"Come closer, famous Odysseus –
Achaea
’s pride and glory –
moor your ship on our coast
so you can hear our song!
Never has any sailor passed our shores
in his black craft
until he has heard the honeyed voices
pouring from our lips,
and once he hears to his heart’s content
sails on, a wiser man”.
(The Odyssey, 12:200. Homer. Trans. by Robert Fagles )


A hint of music entered my head as I walked along the pathway between the Humanities Building and Knudsen Hall. Echoes of familiar sounds turned my thoughts away from the lecture I’d just heard, and which route to take to the Newman Center. They crept up on me like the tickling sensations one feels when someone silently enters your room, or pulls up alongside your car while driving. I was forced to stop and look for the source of the intrusion. Turning my head from side to side, I swept the area, searching for a tell-tale sight or sound. I heard it again; a whisper of music that I could almost identify. I hesitated asking anyone, since no one else seemed to notice. Students were trooping past me, oblivious to anything unusual, seemingly determined to reach their destinations as quickly as possible. There it was again! Obsessed now, by these mysterious sounds, and determined to prove I wasn’t going crazy, I changed my path. I crossed the tree-lined street onto the open grassy area of Dickson Court. I could hear better from there, but the sounds were still faint. My audio Geiger counter finally started crackling as I walked toward Schoenberg Hall. Of course, I thought, strike my forehead with my palm, the music building! The source of the sounds may have been revealed, but not the mystery.

What was I hearing, and why was I the only person on this side of campus reacting to this music? As I approached the entrance to the glassed façade, I finally began to distinguish the melodious sounds of violins and cello playing a hauntingly familiar piece of classical music. I walked in on what can only be described as an impromptu string quartet concert. There in the middle of a vast lobby, four student musicians sat on battered folding chairs, in front of rickety music stands, playing 2 violins, a viola, and a cello. Staring intently at the music sheets before their eyes, these young men and women rocked furiously in rhythm with their instruments, and the music they created. I stood mute and entranced. They were clearly students who had come together to practice and play. They were similar to my Political Science study group which met to research a topic or investigate a hypothesis in the library. Only these were Fine Arts students and their major consisted of practicing for musical performances. They sat in a towering chamber and hallway which allowed the music to swell and soar into the air, until one of them would suddenly halt it, by saying “Wait, wait, wait, that’s not it. Let’s try it again. Start from the top”. There weren’t many interruptions; the musicians seemed pretty good. Students and an occasional adult would walk by, stop, listen, and continue forward, entering or exiting the building. Everyone seemed to accept this spectacle as a natural part of the environment of this building, which I was visiting for the first time in my freshman year. I couldn’t believe my good fortune. Music for free, and it was all for me. I was done for the day, with no more classes. I had nothing to do, and it didn’t appear that the quartet was leaving any time soon. I found a nearby bench and sat down. Placing my backpack by my side, I settled in to enjoy this private concerto, in the echoing chamber of Schoenberg Hall. I would never discover the titles or composers of the pieces they practiced, but it didn’t matter in those early days of college. My clapping startled the musicians when they finished the practice, and I was too embarrassed to ask them what they had played. I just sat and enjoyed the music and the sensations they created. It was my only private concert at UCLA, and my introduction to chamber music and the intimate seductions of a string quartet. I never found out why other students did not follow me into the building to discover this music. They acted as though their ears were plugged with wax.



Classical music has always transported me to other times, places, and sensations. My mother claims that she listened to classical records during her pregnancy to teach me an appreciation for fine music while I was en utero. I can’t testify to the effectiveness of this practice, and it certainly did not engender or stimulate my musical talent. I neither play an instrument nor carry a decent tune when singing. However, classical music was the first musical genre I fell in love with (followed by rock and roll in my youth, blues in middle age, jazz in my wisdom, and occasionally country). My first memory of a concert was being taken to the Palacio de Bellas Artes, the Palace of Fine Arts, in Mexico City, to hear the National Philharmonic Symphony when I was a child. My uncle Carlos was a cellist in the symphony and he arranged for my mother and I to attend an afternoon performance. I recall dressing up and treating the occasion as a very special event. I loved the location, the setting, the orchestra, and the ritualistic aspects of the performance. The only draw back was the dress requirement; I loved the music, hated the coat and tie. Later, when I discovered my parent’s classical record collection I played the LP’s over and over on our Victrola phonograph: Flight of the Valkyries, by Wagner, Swan Lake and The Nutcracker Suite, by Tchaikovsky, Beethoven’s Fifth Symphony, Blue Danube by Strauss, and even Rhapsody in Blue by Gershwin. I wore (or scratched) the vinyl off those records by my repetitive playing. Despite this attraction to classical music, the only class I ever took in Music Appreciation was in high school. In college I satisfied my fine arts requirement by taking three quarters of Art History, so I was relegated to public libraries to explore and discover the world of classical composers on my own. It was from these borrowed records that I heard the differences between the Baroque, Classic, and Romantic periods, by listening to Bach, Handel, Mozart, Haydn, Beethoven, Schubert, Liszt, Wagner, and Brahms, to name just a few. I enjoyed them all, but the greatest allure for me was the smaller orchestras that played chamber music. My accidental discovery of the string quartet at Schoenberg Hall only whet my appetite for this type of ensemble, and I’ve been a fan ever since. It was this attraction that brought me to the First Baptist Church of Glendale, on August 17, 2008, to hear the Avanti String Quartet.



All artists, whether they are painters, writers, photographers, designers, sculptors, or actors create a unique, thought-provoking experience or object out of nothing. Professional artists are especially blessed because they have reached a level of expertise that people will pay to watch, hear, and appreciate their performance or product. I’ve always considered it an honor to know them because they are in a class by themselves. That is not to imply that their lives are easy; in fact the opposite is usually true. Only the most fortunate of artists can live from their art.  Most professionals still need additional jobs (substitute teachers, personal tutors, temporary secretaries, caterers, waiters, landscapers, realtors, etc) in order to continue creating. Of all these artists, I’ve always thought musicians to be “other worldly”. Good musicians, in every genre, produce the sounds of angels. They create a sensory experience that touches all our faculties, and take us outside our selves. Listening to professional musicians who are also friends or family members is a transcendental treat, because of the extra dimension of personal familiarity. Even when they return to their mortal guises of uncles, nephews, nieces, sisters-in-law, brothers-in-law,  daughters-in-law,  sons-in-law, or friends, their professional status gives off a special aura. My Mexican uncle Carlos was the only classical musician I knew until Eddie, my brother, met and married Tamsen (see Giri: Family Obligations), a violinist for the Los Angeles Opera Orchestra and the Glendale Symphony. While my uncle has retired, Tamsen is in full career, performing as a soloist and as a leader or member of various ensemble groups. In 2004, she and three other women formed the Avanti Quartet. Eddie has always kept his family abreast of Tamsen’s performance schedule. Because of my love of chamber music, and my desire to support family artists, I have always tried to attend as many performances of the Avanti String Quartet as possible. When I received Eddie’s email alerting me to three performance dates, I chose one and responded that I would see him on the 17th.



A string quartet is an amazingly intimate vehicle to enjoy classical music. The instruments are versatile enough to play most musical compositions, and the proximity to the audience makes the experience personal and inviting. The Avanti Quartet seduces the audience into the music, with their combination of style and talent. The ensemble is composed of 4 attractive women who are classically trained, accomplished, and respected professionals: Tamsen Beseke, first violin, Carrie Kennedy, second violin, Kaila Potts, viola, and a guest cellist for this performance, Cathy Biagini. During the performance they made time to interact with the audience, introducing themselves and their instrument, and discussing the composers and their works. The artists were personable and open with their guests, revealing confidence, shyness, humor, and charm in their speech and manner. These four sirens of music left a lasting impression on the men and women sitting in the pews of this picturesque, little church in Glendale. Starting with movements from Mozart’s String Quartet in C major, K157, followed by Glaznov’s peppy Five Novellettes, the Jazz Pizzicato by Leroy Anderson, and the String Quartet in D major, Op. 44 No 1, by Mendelssohn, the Avanti group guided their audience on a musical odyssey of the 18th, 19th, and 20th Century. I usually just sit and listen when I go to chamber recitals, much the same way I did at Schoenberg Hall so many years ago. On this occasion, however, I didn’t want to be a spellbound captive to music. I wanted to do something different; so I brought my camera.



I have been experimenting with my camera all summer – trying out different action sequences, lighting perspectives, shooting angles, and shutter speeds. Candid action shots have posed the biggest challenge because of the equipment and technical requirements. This is even more problematic for me because my pictures need proximity to the subject. I lack the high powered telephoto lenses to shoot from a distance. Since I have to be close to the person or action I’m photographing, it’s easier having willing subjects and spectators who allow me to intrude. This is difficult if I want take pictures of strangers performing spontaneous actions, or in front of a ticket-purchasing, sophisticated audience. I’ve avoided this dilemma by concentrating on family events and friends. Although I assumed that Eddie and Tamsen would allow me to take pictures of the concert if I was unobtrusive, I wasn’t sure of the audience; classical music aficionados can be finicky and pretentious. I might wander about freely in a Concert in the Park, taking pictures of performers and spectators, but a formal music chamber like a church or auditorium did not allow that liberty of motion. I needed a cloak of invisibility, a device that would make me part of the landscape, or background, as I moved about taking pictures of musicians, scenery, and audience; and I thought I had it. On a whim, about 3 months ago I’d taken an imaginary precaution in case I ever wanted to photograph an unplanned or unexpected subject or event. I’d always noticed how individuals carrying cameras and wearing lanyards with plastic encased, oversized identification passes with photos, labeled OFFICIAL and PRESS, were always given open access at public events. People just moved aside and let the photographer step in and shoot. Rarely did anyone challenge the cameraman or check his credentials. So, I downloaded a blank “Official” Press Pass for the Mobile Broadcast News from the internet. On one side it had space for a photo mug shot and information, and on the back an authentic sounding, Constitution-like quote, invoking the rights of religion, free speech, the press, and assembly. I typed in my information, added a recent passport photo, and encased the pass in a bold plastic sleeve on a brightly colored lanyard. It looked great; and real! I never had the nerve to use it, but I imagined that one day, in a Rockford File situation, I might need to. The Avanti Concert was the first time I dusted it off and tossed it into my camera case. It worked like a charm.



Eddie gave me carte blanche to take pictures of the Avanti Quartet during their performance, and the press pass gave me a freedom of movement I would not have dared take without it. No one in the audience turned a head or batted an eye as I changed locations; moving forward, back, to one side of the church and another. The more photos I took, the bolder I became. There was another photographer in the church using a camera with a telephoto lens on a tripod. We silently nodded to each other and continued shooting. I became so confident of my disguise that I hoped someone would actually challenge me. I had a ready response: I was Tony, a freelance photographer and journalist for LiveJournal, an internet website, covering the story on the Avanti Quartet concert. After all, these were talented, hardworking professional artists who merited media attention. Why not treat them as stars? The artists certainly deserved the attention. I got so carried away with my new persona of paparazzi that I insisted on more intimate photos of the performers. At intermission, Eddie took me backstage to meet and photograph the quartet as they relaxed and refreshed; that’s when my façade cracked. In the actual presence of these attractive and charming ladies and talented artists, I became a gushing fan. I awkwardly confessed that I loved their music, their selection of works, and their interaction with the audience (Thank God, I didn’t ask for their autographs). When I shyly asked if I could take their pictures, they rescued me by finding the right location, the best light, and posed professionally. I just had to point the viewfinder and click.



As I was awakening from this magically feminine and artistic encounter and returning to my seat, an elderly gentleman walked up to me and said in a very sincere way, “Thank you for being here”. When it dawned on me that he had thanked me, believing I was a newspaper photographer, I felt like a charlatan and fraud. Until that point, I had been playing a game, pretending to be someone I was not. My intention had been to merely take pictures of Tamsen and the quartet for myself and Eddie, now I felt guilty. The only way I could redeem myself and enjoy the second half of the performance was to give truth to my pretense. I WAS an amateur photographer and an authentic blogger on LiveJournal; all I had to do now was record and report the event for everyone to read and see. I made a silent promise to write this essay and post it, even though the elderly gentleman might never see it. At peace with myself, and one with the audience, I settled back into my seat to enjoy the music of my youth.
dedalus_1947: (Default)

Sisters, sisters
There were never such devoted sisters;
Never had to have a chaperone, no sir,
I’m there to keep my eye on her.
Caring, sharing
Every little thing that we are wearing;
When a certain gentleman arrives from Rome,
She wore the dress, and I stayed home.
All kinds of weather, we stick together,
The same in the rain and sun;
Two different faces, but in tight places,
We think and act as one.
Those who’ve seen us
Know that not a thing could come between us;
Many men have tried to split us up, but no one can.
Lord help the mister who comes between me and my sister,
And Lord help the sister, who comes between me and my man.
(Sisters, sisters: words & lyrics by Irving Berlin. Recorded by Rosemary
Clooney and Vera Ellen in movie,
White Christmas: 1954)

 “Is solace anywhere more comforting than in the arms of a sister?”
(Alice Walker)

 This essay is really about nothing. It is not a newsworthy story, nor does it relate information of any significant importance. No philosophical theme or political treatise is presented; and no allegory or metaphor is imbedded in the tale. It’s just a story of seven sisters who came together for a day and a half at a beach house in July. In fact, everything that happened during the event conspired to keep it ordinary. There were no fights, arguments, or conflicts; and even the photographic record was remarkably innocent, as if censored by some benevolent, angelic guardian. The evening photos I took during the giggly, hot tub session were blurry, unfocused, and poorly lit, allowing no clear identification of face, body, or bathing suit. The only pictures that came out were bright and luminous portraits of women sitting, laughing, and posing for the camera. One would think that when seven ladies, between the ages of 46 and 64, came together to talk for 36 hours, something scandalous would occur. However, there was no material here for an Edward Albee play, like Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? It seemed as though the one to two hour drive to Ventura from various locations in Los Angeles had allowed each of these experienced women to leave their jobs, husbands, children, and worries behind, and become open, carefree, and frivolous girls again. For two days, these 7 ladies would be only one thing – sisters.

 A Sisters’ Reunion is a regular feature of the relationships that exist among the female siblings in Kathy’s family. For over 20 years, the girls would make an effort to meet at least 4 or 5 times a year (not counting official family parties, such as Thanksgiving, Christmas or Easter). These meeting took on extra significance after the death of Debbie, the second sibling, and Mary, their mother. The loss of these two central female figures in their lives, really illustrated the need for connection and communication between family members, and birthdays provided the best excuses to get together. A restaurant would be selected nearest the person, or persons, celebrating the event, and as many sisters as possible tried to attend. These occasions were usually single sex affairs, although a man (Greg or their father) would sometimes make a sneak appearance. Because of the all-girl nature of these parties, I’ve always been curious about what they did and the topics they discussed. Granted, I’d been present, and a participant, at many after-dinner, and after-party, discussions with Kathy’s siblings (see Over the Hill), but never at one of these official Sisters’ Reunions. They held a forbidden allure for me. So when Kathy asked me if I would mind if she invited her six sisters to the beach house we were renting in Ventura during our summer vacation, I said the idea sounded fine – as long as I was able to stay and help. She agreed to my conditions and the planning of the event began in earnest.


As I listened to Kathy and watched her logistical machinations, I gathered that three factors were driving the concept of hosting a party for Beth, the eighth of 10 siblings in her family.  First, Mary Ellen (M.E.), the eldest sister, would be in town at the end of July, visiting their father. Her presence would serendipitously unite all 7 of the surviving sisters together at the same time, something that is difficult to do with M.E. living in Washington D.C. Second, Beth was turning 50 on July 31, and Kathy wanted to do something special for the occasion. A half century, five decades, is a significant benchmark that calls for a special celebration. However, Beth was in the middle of a hundred things in the month of July: teaching summer school at a Jesuit high school, finishing her Master’s research paper, organizing visits to and from her college, and post-college aged children who live throughout the state, and preparing for the start of the new school year in August. Kathy felt that a 50th birthday called for a unique location and a different agenda.  A beach house would present an attractive destination, especially for sisters who spent their childhood summers on the beach in Capistrano. Lastly, the girls had never participated in an adult, over-night sleep-over that would allow them to be together, without the annoying distractions of time, travel, and other family obligations. An extended period of time together, would give them the chance to really explore and discuss issues, questions, and concerns that would not be mentioned in a restaurant. These were the three talking points that Kathy used when calling her sisters to gauge their interest, and then convincing them that this opportunity was simply too good to pass up. I couldn’t imagine how any of her sisters would turn her down - and they didn’t. Within a month’s time of the first phone call in May, all of the sisters were on board and committed to coming on July 29 for a day at the beach, dinner, and a slumber party.

 Beth and Mary Ellen arrived just before noon, and joined us for lunch as they described their father’s health and driving habits at 89 years old. Then, as if in a rhythmically choreographed routine, one by one, the other “little girls” arrived: Tootie, then Meg, and finally Tere, the youngest. Soon after, Patty called to say that she was in route and not to wait on her account. When the sisters realized that, other than food and refreshments, there was no planned agenda or program to guide their actions for the day, they immediately reverted to “Capistrano Beach mode” and began differentiating their activities. Meg decided to go jogging, M.E. and Kathy wanted to sit by the ocean, and the rest went walking to the pier.  My role was simple. I was the cook, photographer, and cabana boy for the event. In return for these efforts, I would be permitted to observe, listen, and, to some degree, record the activities of the next 36 hours. It was actually a lot of fun. I’ve watched these young women (M.E., Kathy, and Patty), and girls when I first met them (Meg, Beth, Tootie, and Tere), mature and grow up over the last 35 years. They are fun to be around. They all share many of the same qualities that cause me to BE in love with Kathy. Their intelligence, cleverness, empathy, and humor make for great company and a terrific band of sisters.


 Eventually, everyone found themselves by the ocean, sitting on beach chairs, towels, or benches. People were reading, talking, or just staring off to sea. Slowly, singly or in pair, they made their way back to the beach house where cocktails and hors d’houvres awaited them on the patio. Over the course of the evening and the following morning, these seven sisters would talk, laugh, drink, eat, and talk some more. It wasn’t quite a marathon gab-fest, but it was close. I just listened, and occasionally took pictures. Listening to these sisters’ talk and laugh is like hearing an impromptu jazz performance by a seasoned septet, who had reunited for a special benefit show. They played the standard pieces about their father, mother, and brothers, and then they did some improvisation on their own. Each sister would take a solo riff and tell a short or long story, or reveal a long hidden insight. These were variations on old themes that now came from a new perspective, but they sounded different; a new twist, a new sound, a new detail. My being there was superfluous, but Prisa’s presence opened up talk about her upcoming wedding and reflections on their own ceremonies and marriages.

 I’d considered writing a blog about the occasion, but wasn’t sure what it would be about. I could not come up with a unifying theme or incident that would give it meaning. I did not want to write an expose of some outrageous comment or revelation that was mentioned in the course of the reunion. I was there as a trusted brother-in-law, an uncle to their children, and a caring friend; I did not want to violate that confidence. Actually I couldn’t even if I wanted to – I wasn’t really paying attention to the facts and every detail being said. I was just sitting back and enjoying the whole experience. Yet one question haunted me during and after the celebration was over. How would I describe these ladies, whom I have seen going “from crayons to perfume?”  Photos could easily provide an image of their physical appearance, but I wondered if an accurate characterization of these girls, now women, was really possible – or even advisable. These women are always evolving, and what they say at sibling reunions and get-togethers is always colored by a unique family filter that allows for large fluctuations of sentiment and emotion. These ladies use talk and confessions as a form of beneficial therapy (something like the “talking cure” that Freud described in his early writings). Verbalizing ones fears, insecurities, and embarrassments (real and imagined) liberates them, and gives them the opportunity to reflect about themselves and be empathetic to others. What they say, however, is not necessarily what they do, or who they are. Yet a silly idea did occur to me as I was making up titles for an imaginary blog about this reunion, and I googled the name Seven Sisters.


 The popular use of the term Seven Sisters was first coined in 1927, as the name given to the 7 prestigious women’s colleges, Barnard, Smith, Mount Holyoke, Vassar, Bryn Mawr, Wellesley, and Radcliffe. These are the “sister” schools to the elite Ivy League men’s colleges. However, the name was originally a reference to the Greek myth of the Pleiades, the seven daughters of Atlas, the titan, and the sea-nymph Pleione. The daughters were collectively referred to as the Seven Sisters. The myth recounts the tale that one day the great hunter Orion saw the Pleiades as they were walking through the countryside and was smitten by their grace and beauty. He became so crazed with desire that he relentlessly pursued them for seven years, until Zeus finally intervened. Granting the prayers and petitions of the desperate siblings, he transformed them into 7 doves and placed them in the heavens – becoming the star cluster called The Pleiades in the constellation of Taurus. Later, when Orion was killed, Zeus also placed him in the night sky, but behind the Pleiades, thereby immortalizing (or mocking) his futile pursuit of them. The names of The Pleiades, or The Seven Sisters, were Maia, Electra, Taygete, Alcyone, Celaeno, Asterope, and Merope.

 I was especially surprised when my google search also identified the Seven AND Eight Virtues in this category. The existence of an eighth virtue intrigued me because it allowed me to resolve a problem I had in drawing parallels with the Pleiades of myth and Kathy’s sisters. You see, there should have been eight sisters at this party to make it complete. If the indifferent hand of fate had not intervened 5 years ago, the missing place at the table would have been occupied by another sister. I wondered then, if perhaps, in the myriad of Greek and Roman myths, an alternate story of the daughters of Atlas and Pleione might not exist; one in which there was an eighth sister called Deborah. This daughter became lost one night when she foolishly wandered into the Labyrinth of Minos, and was not present when Orion came along and chased the other seven sisters into the heavens. In the world of mythology, this would explain why there are 8 Virtues, but only 7 Pleiades.


 At the conclusion of the party, once the gaiety and celebration was over, and the sisters had taken their leave and departed the beach house, I took the liberty of matching Kathy’s sisters with their corresponding Pleiades name and its meaning. I then added the Virtue that might fit that particular sister, followed by my own italicized character trait for each one:

 1. Mary Ellen (M.E.) – Maia: “grandmother, mother, nurse, the great one”. Kindness/Peace, Intelligence
* (Debbie – Deborah:“bee, or prophetess”, the lost Pleiades of mythology. Liberality/Generosity, Grace/Charm).
2. Kathy – Electra: “amber, shining, bright, to flow, running, as a liquid”. Humility/Modesty, Charisma
3. Patty – Taygete: “long-necked”. Chastity/Purity, Compassion
4. Meg – Alcyone or Halcyone: “queen who wards off evil (storms)”. Patience/Forbearance, Humor.
5. Beth – Celaeno: “swarthy”. Diligence/Effort, Persistence.
6. Tootie – Asterope or Sterope: “lightning, twinkling, sun-face, stubborn-face, star, stellar”. Temperance/Restraint, Independence.
7. Tere – Merope: “eloquent, bee-eater, mortal”. Justice/Righteousness, Competitiveness.


 As I explained at the beginning of the essay, there is really nothing extraordinary about a reunion of siblings. In the early days of our youth, we simply had to state the wish to meet, and it would happen; we lived together, played together, and suffered together. Yet with the advancement of years, marriage, children and families, opportunities to do so became scarcer and scarcer, and we became more and more alienated from the unity we once experienced. Big family get-togethers at weddings, Christmas, or Easter don’t really allow sufficient time to question, talk, and bond; and we always seem too busy to arrange other occasions. Kathy’s party for Beth gave these seven sisters a chance to cohere for a moment, and to call forth that wondrous time of childhood, when siblings could imagine and make up how things SHOULD be. Watching them talk, laugh, and play reminded me of my own 5 siblings, whom I don’t see often enough, outside of Christmas Eve and special occasions. Perhaps the constancy of the Pleiades in the night sky is a reminder to us that sisters and brothers are always there, but we have to look up to see them.


dedalus_1947: (Default)
 “A Moveable Feast: a feast day that falls 
on the same day of the week each year,

but has a date that varies.”

(The Phrase Finder)
 
“The most sublime creation of modern times

is the ideal woman of the average man.

She is a migratory bird, a sort of movable feast as it were.”

(First use of the words as a metaphor: “The Ideal Woman”- Bismarck Tribune, 1882)

 

“If you are lucky enough to have lived in Paris as a young man,

then wherever you go for the rest of your life it stays with you,

for Paris is a moveable feast”.

(A Moveable Feast: Ernest Hemingway, 1964)

 

“The ‘Baby Boom Siblings’ (Kathy, Mike, Patty, Greg, Meg, Beth, Tootie and Tere) were, and continue being a fun-loving group to be around. In the early days of our marriage, they were a moveable feast”.

(Over the Hill: Dedalus Log, 2008)
 

Vacation, leave, liberty, recreation, rest and relaxation (R & R), holiday; these are words to describe “a fixed period of holidays, especially one during which a school, court, or business suspends activities. It is the act or an instance of vacating”. It has been over 30 years since I’ve had a summer vacation in the truest sense; in the way students think of one. An extended period of time in which there are “no more pencils, no more books, and no more teachers’ dirty looks.” Those long ago, wistful summers were the best of times: staying up late, watching TV past 10 o’clock, sleeping in, playing street games until dark, reading trashy novels, walking to the playground to play caroms, or biking to the beach to lay in the sun. Those were the endless days of childhood summer, when my brothers, sisters, and I lost track of time and obligations, and only worried about how to answer our recurring, daily question – “What do you want to do today?” Every day we decided on a new adventure or distraction, from breaking into a deserted house up the street or playing marathon games of Monopoly, to weaving countless key lanyards from plastic strips.

 

Recapturing some aspects of those blissful times was one of the reasons Kathy and I considered going into teaching, and staying in education. A summer hiatus away from students, teachers, and lessons was rejuvenating and invigorating. After a summer vacation, Kathy and I would attack the new school year with renewed vim and vigor. Even the eventual necessity of part-time work during the two month break didn’t diminish the glamour of summer. There was still plenty of time for pool parties at Yarmouth Ave, reading science fiction novels, and spending a week at the beach house of Kathy’s parents. Unfortunately, job demands began encroaching on these idyllic summers about 13 years ago. This corresponded with the State’s decision to increase instructional days and expand the school year to the end of June, which required principals to report to work in August. These additional days created a two week overlap with my 6 week summer school duties and the start of my regular assignment, so that I found myself working 2 weeks for free, with no time off. Summer vacation as a reality disappeared completely when I was assigned to MASH Middle School, a year-round school.

 

For the last three years, the spring semester would end on June 30th, for A and B Track students and teachers, and then a new “fall” semester would resume for B and C Track students and teachers on July 1st. It was a treadmill existence; a school that never stopped operating. A year-round school is a metaphor for hell to principals and assistant principals who work there; they are schools with no exit. The only oasis of tranquility, in this otherwise barren chronology, was a two week break we took at a rented beach house in Ventura (see Ventura Highway). That has been my island of serenity for the last three years – until this July. On June 30, 2008, the school year at MASH Middle School came to a close, and it stayed closed for the summer. School will not reopen until September 3, when students and teachers return for the first day of class, at a newly constituted, traditional-calendar, school.

 
As happens when a rubber band snaps back after having been stretched to its extreme limits for a long time, returning to my original state of rest and normalcy took awhile. I endured three sleepless nights and drowsy mornings until I started to feel relaxed and comfortable. Luckily, my first weekend on vacation (the Fourth of July weekend) was filled with diversions and visits by Tonito, Prisa, and their fiancées. It wasn’t until my first Monday in bed that it hit me – I didn’t have to go to work today, tomorrow, or the next day. In fact, I would have no contact with the school or District officials until August. I had nothing to do for two weeks except keep myself occupied, watch Kathy leave each morning, and make preparations for our annual escape to Ventura for a two week holiday. Kathy was still working, completing her summer school business, so I was totally alone and on my own. My first sensation was panic, and I started making lists of things to do. Yet somehow, the idea of “lists” struck me as anathema to a proper approach to my first real summer vacation - certainly my youthful approach (I didn’t discover “To Do Lists” until I married and became organized.). The closest I came to itemizing my plans was mentioning some of my summer longings in my Morning Journal. I wanted to read more, do some writing, get together with my brothers and sisters, and be spontaneous. The latter was the most intriguing – but so elusive as to be chimerical. How do you practice spontaneity when you have lots of time, but nothing to do? You can’t get into the car and drive around looking for it. Spontaneous occurrences are opportunities that present themselves in the course of an ordinary day; the trick is to recognize them and seize them (carpe diem). Just as I was shaking my head at this whimsical notion of being spontaneous during the summer, I recalled an invitation I had previously dismissed as too distant, too troublesome, and too farfetched. I’d received an email from Tere, Kathy’s youngest sister, informing me of a series of diving finals in which her two daughters were competing. At first I was pleased to be on Tere’s family email grouping, but I hadn’t really considered attending, figuring that I would be too busy doing something, or preferring to do nothing, rather than driving to USC and watching a junior diving meet. Now I realized that spontaneity doesn’t happen in a vacuum, one needs people and action to be spontaneous. Here was an opportunity staring me in the face, waiting to be grasped. The more I thought about it, the more serendipitous it became. The next day I sent Tere a responding email asking for directions, adding that I was planning to attend.

 

Actually, Tere’s email wasn’t all that unusual; it was simply another example of the ingrained custom in Kathy’s family of informing (inviting) relatives and friends of upcoming family occasions and events. Since becoming part of Kathy’s large family, I’ve observed this practice over 30 years. My earliest memories are of Debbie (the second child) letting us know when her children, Jeff and Christy (and eventually Alicia) were swimming (both), performing (Jeff), or playing sports (Christy). Kathy’s brothers and sisters always managed to drop by, and if enough of them came together, an impromptu party might ensue at Debbie’s home. In those days, Debbie was the preeminent hostess of spontaneous family parties. In the years that followed, with successive marriages and more and more nieces and nephews, the family calendar of events was always full. Kathy has always been a strong advocate and supporter of this practice, even though now with adult children (and as we edge closer and closer to retirement) our own family doesn’t generate as many “invite-able” activities or events as in past years. However, she always makes an effort to attend, and encourages her sisters and brothers to always announce such activities. This custom is difficult to explain, because it has no succinct title or definition. Giri misses the mark. Kathy and her brothers and sisters (and their husbands, wives, and children) do not attend these events out of a sense of duty or obligation, but rather, I think, because of a desire to share in a possibly unique experience and be present for someone other than themselves. The obligation is to inform and publicize the family event; the response must come from a personal desire to go, without it being a burden. This dynamic was best illustrated for me in 1998, when Prisa was a senior in high school, playing in a CIF playoff game in basketball.

 

After four years on the varsity team, Prisa had a great senior year in basketball. Her coaches blended two experienced veterans and co-captains (Prisa and Kari) with a crop of very talented freshman, into a formidable team. The team had jumped out to a surprising string of early tournament victories, stayed competitive during conference play, and, with a 15 – 6 record, was now making a determined run for a playoff title. The playoffs were single game eliminations. Louisville won its first 2 games, and was advancing to play St. Paul in the third round. Kathy put out the informative with the clear understanding that the game was inconveniently scheduled on a Saturday night and in the geographically challenging city of Santa Fe Springs. The game site was simply too far away to be practical for general family attendance. Even Kathy wouldn’t be there, because the date conflicted with an obligatory conference in Anaheim; but she put out the informative anyway, believing that the prayers, thoughts, and best wishes of family members would help Prisa and the team. On the night of the game I was there with a small band of loyal supporters, and Prisa was in a zone. She was building up for a monster game, leading the Louisville offense at just the right time. As the first half was winding to a close (with Prisa scoring 5 points), I caught sight of a familiar figure entering the gym. I couldn’t believe it, hundreds of miles from home, on a cold and rainy February night, Greg, Kathy’s youngest brother (see Giri: Family Taboos). was sauntering into the scantily filled arena, watching the action and scanning the bleachers. I was stunned; but I was also elated, because I was no longer alone to witness this critical game. After giving him a heartfelt abrazo and back-pounding, I asked him why he had traveled all the way from Santa Barbara on this stormy night just to see a basketball game. He looked at me curiously and said that it wasn’t JUST a basketball game, it was a playoff game, and it might be Prisa’s last. He added that he had played varsity basketball in high school and knew the significance of playoffs. He was glad Kathy had informed him, and he was happy to be here. As these words were sinking in, I looked up to see that Kathy had somehow materialized to join us as well. She confessed that she couldn’t stay away; so she sneaked away from a session. Kathy had skipped dinner and driven here, figuring that she could get back before anyone missed her. Together, the three of us watched Prisa have the game of her career, scoring a season high 19 points (14 in the second half, and 7 in the last quarter). With St. Paul up 55 – 52 and less than a minute to play, Louisville called a time out to set up the last play. Prisa took the last shot from the 3-point line at the buzzer - and missed (she was actually fouled, but no referee would have dared to called it). It was the most exciting game of the year, and although we were disappointed with the score, we weren’t unhappy with the outcome. Prisa and the team had stepped up and delivered a great game, and we couldn’t be prouder of her leadership or performance – and Greg was there to share it.

 

Greg’s unexpected presence that evening had a profound impact on me. Not only did his cheering, commentary and insights enhance the evening for me, but I saw it as a selfless act of sharing in an important family moment. He didn’t have to be there; there was no burden or obligation to come. He claimed to have done it out of enlightened self-interest (“I love playoff games”), but its affect on me (and I believe Prisa) was different. We felt connected, because he took the time and effort to share an important (and emotional) event with us. Since that occasion, I have also tried to “pay forward” Greg’s act by showing up at some family events. I think it is a dynamic that maintains and energizes the family. When family members respond to these in formatives by showing up, it reinforces the practice for the people who dared to announce and publicize it, and they in turn feel appreciative and compelled to show up when others repeat the process. It is a wonderful cycle of love; showing up to share in a family experience.

 

I had never been to the McDonald’s Olympic Swim Stadium at USC, and normally, as a die-hard UCLA alumni and sports fan, I would have no reason to go. But on July 10, I was there to watch and cheer for Maggie, Tere and Mike’s 13 year old daughter, as she competed in the 2008 USA Junior Zone E Diving Championships. She, and her sister Anora, had been diving now for some years at the Rose Bowl Aquatic Center. Occasionally Kathy and Prisa would go, but I had never seen them dive. The only diving meet I had ever attended was Marisa’s competition against Cal last spring (see All American Girl). I really didn’t know what to expect, or the quality of competition at these junior meets, but I was determined to enjoy myself. The meet would give me a great opportunity to experiment with my new camera, and I was curious to see who else might show up. I did not expect Tere’s incredulity at my arrival. Despite my emailed RSVP, Tere couldn’t believe that I actually showed up. “I can’t believe you came!” she kept repeating, shaking her head. Followed with the refrain, “You didn’t have to come”. In the face of this bewilderment, I just smiled and said, “I wanted to come. I’m on vacation and I couldn’t think of a better place to be on a beautiful, summer morning. Plus, I’ve never seen Maggie or Anora dive”.


 

Tere is the youngest of Kathy’s siblings, and her two girls are the youngest of 26 grandchildren. I don’t often get the chance to see her in the role of mom, juggling multiple tasks while smiling, charmingly: interacting with other diving mothers; dodging their worried requests to meet her husband, a counselor at a prominent Jesuit high school; reassuring Maggie that she will do fine in the meet; and assigning increasingly more complex duties to Anora, so she wouldn’t get bored on her off day. When she was free, she filled me in on the present meet and the diving background of the girls. This was the zone qualifying round, and the top 6 finishers in each category would advance to the Nationals in Houston, Texas. Maggie had just aged up into the senior division, but still had a good chance at qualifying. Nora, she said, was on fire, and barring some unforeseen catastrophe, was expected to advance easily. Tere was finishing her summary when Prisa showed up to join us. About 5 minutes later, Meg smiling and waving, swept onto the pool deck to complete the family cheering section that was present for Maggie. The morning went by quickly, with the older divers moving rapidly through their sequence of nine dives. Maggie started out strongly and confidently, and then held on to finish in the top 6. I got a little carried away with the ease of my camera and took tons of pictures (Maggie thinking, Maggie taking a breath, Maggie advancing to the apex of the board, Maggie leaping…..). It struck me later, when Prisa and I were exploring the USC bookstore after the meet, that I would have to return the following day to photograph Anora as well. Equality of familial attention is a vital concern among pre-teen sisters, and I suspected that Anora had been watching me during the morning, and she was keeping score.

 

Anora was a different person on the day of her competition. While she had been listless, distracted, and slightly bored on Thursday, she was totally focused on Friday. She was diving in a popular age group, with many, many divers. When Tere caught me frowning at the number of competitors, and the huge number of adults in the bleachers, she told me not to worry. There would be less dives (6), she explained, and the organizers would move the events quickly. She was right.


 

The rest of the family boosters arrived just as the meet got underway. Prisa returned to join me for another round, and Christy arrived with her two girls, Taylor and Maya. She (as usual) looked fabulous! Except for the big family events (Christmas and weddings), I don’t see her very often, so today was a treat. Christy was a superb athlete in her youth, playing club soccer for many years, swimming and playing basketball in high school, and playing water polo in college. In many ways she modeled the behaviors that her uncles and aunts pointed out and described to their own daughters as they grew up; a good balance of athletics and learning, with a clear focus on practicing the skills and lessons taught in sports and academics to ensure successful performances in games and classrooms. These were habits that Prisa followed in high school and college, and I could see it in more and more girls in this family. It was a tradition that stretched in a long feminine line from Christy, to Alicia, to Prisa, to Brigid, to Caitrin, to Marisa, to Maria, to Brenna, to Maggie, and finally to Anora. Except for Mary Ellen’s girls, who did not have this Southern California exposure to all-year sports, these cousins’ shared remarkable abilities and similarities.

 

As Tere predicted, the meet moved swiftly. Anora was seeded second in the diving order and she systematically dominated each dive. She was quick, efficient, and machine-like in her preparation, concentration, and performance technique. I don’t remember seeing her smile until the competition was over. I took the opportunity of the long wait for the announcements of the times and places of each of the 30 divers to photograph Tere, her daughters, her nieces, and grand-nieces. I hoped they would see the inter-connections that bound them all together on this sunny morning. I knew that these events, so time consuming and bothersome in many ways, would slowly disappear as the girls went into high school and college. Eventually they would end all together. Tere and Christy were still a long time away from that place, but I knew it would arrive sooner than expected. I wondered if Anora and Maggie would remember these days and the people who came to share them. Would they also feel the need to “pay it forward”? I was glad I was able to be present to share one of those occasions.

 

Anora took first place in her division
dedalus_1947: (Default)
Jesus had revealed himself to his disciples
And, when they had finished breakfast,
Said to Simon Peter,
“Simon, son of John, do you love me more than these?”
Simon Peter answered, “Yes, Lord,
You know that I love you”.
Jesus said to him, “Feed my lambs”.
He then said to Simon Peter a second time,
“Simon, son of John, do you love me?”
Simon answered him,
“Yes, Lord, you know that I love you”.
He said, “Tend my sheep”.
He said to him the third time,
“Simon, son of John, do you love me?”
Peter was distressed that he had asked a third time,
And he said, “Lord, you know everything;
You know that I love you”.
Jesus said to him, “Feed my sheep”…
And when he had said this, he said, “Follow me”.
(John 21: 15-19)
 
Thou art a priest forever
According to the order of Melchizedek.
(Hebrews 7:18)
 
I went out to take some pictures in preparation for Father Alden’s last Mass at OLV and his farewell dinner. It was the first time I admitted feeling any emotions about these two events and their significance. Father Alden has been a comfortable part of the community and spiritual life at OLV for 11 years. I’m avoiding coming to grips with my feelings about his departure, and keep circling around them – literally circling. I found myself driving around taking photographs of the church and the Canoga Park community on a hot Saturday afternoon. I started in the heights of West Hills, overlooking the church, and slowly spiraled my way toward the single steeple along Topanga Canyon Boulevard. I’m clearly in denial over all this.
 


I remember when Fr. Alden arrived in 1997. He was young, enthusiastic, and bursting with energy. Alden was such a contrast to our departing pastor, whom I’d grown to love. I suppose I accepted him quickly because Fr. John had made it so clear that managing a huge multi-ethnic parish was not a job he wanted to continue. He was so relieved and excited at the prospect of escaping the rigors and stresses of the business sides of pastoral work that I could only be happy for him. John was a loving, compassionate, and saintly man, who was never cut out for the role of administrator. On the other hand, Alden looked eager and sounded confident of his ability to take on these duties. As a middle school principal with 7 years experience at the time, I was beginning to appreciate John’s desire to escape executive responsibilities; and I was a little bemused at Alden’s eagerness to grasp them. The glamour of being the leader and in command of a huge enterprise that ministers to hundreds and hundreds of people can be very heady and thrilling at first. Then the inexorable, glacially moving pressures begin to build and build. One doesn’t notice at first, but slowly, year after year, the stresses of problem-solving grow, the tensions of decision-making build, and soon your back, shoulders, neck, and chest start exhibiting the gnawing aches of physical pain. When the sensations of physical discomfort finally cross the subconscious divide into sleep, then you have reached full maturity in the fearful world of overwhelming responsibility. This occurs when one, mistakenly, comes to think that they are responsible for everything and everyone.
 
Normally, I had little to do with pastors, priests, or parish affairs. I usually kept a distance from the Church, the religious orders, and parish events. However, Kathy did not. Kathy has always had a personal and personable relationship with all things churchy – even before becoming a Catholic school teacher and principal. I think it was the guidance and influence of the Sisters of St. Joseph of Carondelet (CSJ) at Mount Saint Mary’s College that really liberated Kathy’s approach toward her faith, the Church, and its priests and sisters. With her natural enthusiasm, and charismatic personality, Kathy connected with religious people; and her intelligence and college coursework gave her insights into post-Vatican II Catholicism and the Church. With the birth of our children, she became actively involved in the parishes we joined, and the parish schools our children attended. At OLV she succumbed to the entreaties of the principal, a nun whom she knew from the Mount, and joined the faculty of the parish school as the 8th grade teacher. She had been teaching at the school for 9 years, when Alden arrived. At first, he seemed to be a typical, young American priest: bold and self-assured in his ability to successfully direct a parish, communicate correct dogma from the pulpit, and create beautiful liturgies. However, two things immediately separated Alden from easy over-generalization: an early, personal encounter with him, and a curious comment by Bishop George.



During the first months of his assignment, Alden was meeting with each minister of the various parish programs to talk about their mission and commitment. Kathy and I had been teachers in the Baptism Formation course for 7 years, working with the parents and godparents who sought to baptize their children into the Church. As a teacher in the parish school, Kathy had already met him, but had not yet formed an opinion. I was nervous about this first contact; feeling curious about him, and apprehensive of his approval of our ministry. The encounter was progressing predictably with a discussion about the program, our curriculum and teaching strategies, when he suddenly stopped it. Turning to Kathy, he asked if everything was alright. He claimed to sense a discomfort or unease between us. It was at that point that Kathy revealed that we had just been informed of her need to have an immediate medical biopsy for possible cancer. This sudden confession of our family medical crisis, the unspoken fears about the procedure and its implications had me bewildered. Alden just listened, carefully and thoughtfully. When Kathy finished speaking, he quietly asked her if she wished to be anointed with the sacrament of healing. His prayers, anointing, and soothing words were a calming balm on both of us. We walked out of the Rectory feeling more hopeful about the biopsy, and very favorably impressed with this perceptive young priest. Alden’s first action with us had been that of a caring pastor tending the emotional and physical needs of two frightened members of his flock. This first impression was confirmed when Kathy mentioned our new pastor to her friend Bishop George, when we were talking about the new generation of “big roman-collared” American priests. George remembered Alden as a seminarian at the Camarillo campus, but he volunteered only one comment. He told us not to judge him by his youth or brashness as a manager, because Alden’s instincts and honesty as a priest of the people would surprise us.
 
Many changes occurred in the next 11 years.  The first thing I noticed was the music, and how it kept getting better and better in church. The choir, and especially the cantors, had always been a distraction for me during the masses; they were amateurish or intimidating. For the most part, I just ignored them. The music directors that Alden hired were consistently good, and the music and songs always complimented the mass and the prayers, becoming an integral part of the whole liturgy. There are moments when the music is transcendent. He also invited children to come up on the altar to watch him consecrate the Bread and Wine at the 9 o’clock Sunday mass. At first I thought it was an inspired stunt, but he made it a tradition at that mass. Once past my apprehensions of watching the children squirm, move around, and come too close to altar plants and candles, I learned to appreciate the symbolism. It also helped when I saw the look of wonder and awe in the faces of the children as they watched father lift up the consecrated Host for all to see and believe. But most of all, I appreciated his skill at the pulpit. Alden wasn’t an outstanding homilist, but he always tied his sermons to the readings, kept them short, and left you thinking. He was sometimes funny, and sometimes insightful, but he could always surprise us with an inspired message or lesson. His homilies kept the congregation listening and learning.

 
I suppose what I most admired about Alden as a pastor was his ability to maintain and then develop the cultural and ethnic diversity of the parish. We live in an ethnically segregated community, with an old and large Hispanic barrio surrounded by predominantly white enclaves. Our church was (and is) the only church in the West San Fernando Valley to serve the doctrinal, spiritual, and language needs of all of its congregation, albeit in English or Spanish. It was what first attracted me to OLV. I could look around during mass, and see the rich diversity of believers in the message of God’s Kingdom and Love. It is what won my loyalty to this parish and its school. Alden not only maintained the bilingual and Spanish religious services, but he stemmed the tide of white flight to the nearby affluent and racially homogeneous parishes. He also attracted a growing Filipino population to enroll in the school and swell the numbers of participants at mass. Another of his wiser decisions was accepting the recommendation of his search committee and selecting Kathy as the principal of the parish school. Rumor had it that he had a favored candidate in mind; and as a school administrator I was well aware of the proclivity for board members, superintendents, or parish pastors to choose their own man. Once again, Alden went against the generalized type and listened to the people he had commissioned to identify the best candidate. I had watched Kathy devote herself to the children of the school and parish as a teacher and minister for years. I had counseled her through her experiences as an assistant principal at the school, and a graduate student in the School Administration program at Mount Saint Mary’s College. I was convinced (personally and professionally) that she would make an outstanding principal, and she has.

 
Over eleven years, one gets to know their pastor in a personal way. Kathy’s relationship with Alden is very different from mine. I only knew him as my priest, confessor, and pastor. Kathy knew him as her boss. I think he was a competent manager of the parish, but I found him to be a very good pastor. In some ways he even reminded me of his predecessor, Father John. Alden had a natural tendency to be spontaneous and act out of inspiration, he accepted people for what they were, and he readily forgave them. I appreciated his confessional manner and the way he encouraged my efforts at mediation and prayer. I also learned of our shared interest in the Spanish Mystics of the 1500’s, especially St. John of the Cross. Alden seemed comfortable and satisfied with the job he was doing at OLV, so his reassignment was something of a shock to everyone in the parish. His successor would have a hard act to follow.
 
On the day of the last mass, I still hadn’t come to terms with his leaving, or why he was being reassigned to another parish. I volunteered to photograph both the liturgy and the farewell dinner, figuring that with a camera lens as a buffer, I could maintain emotional distance while coming up with an explanation. During the mass, I occupied myself with countless tasks and distractions. I was constantly changing lenses, changing positions, and moving from seat, to wall, to balcony looking for the right angle or perspective. I finally stopped during the homily; and it was then that Alden’s gospel message hit its mark with me. The sermon was on the Gospel reading from John 21: 15-19 (see above), when Jesus asks Peter (the leader of his first 12 priests) if he loves him more than these others. When Peter responds “Yes, Lord”, Jesus challenges him to “feed my lambs”, “tend my sheep”, and “feed my sheep”. He then commands Peter to follow him. Alden explained that the message of the gospel was the pastoral mission of the Church and its priests, to teach the gospel and tend the flocks of believers wherever they may be. His duty as a priest was to follow Jesus’ command, and take that mission to another parish and a new flock of people. The homily gave me the explanation I sought, but it was his final words before the blessing at the end of mass that moved me. Alden stood in front of his flock and asked each person’s forgiveness for any actions, words, or omissions that caused harm, hurts, or offense. He asked this three times, as if answering Christ’s three commands in the gospel. He ended by telling us that “because I knew you, I have been changed forever”.

 
I’ll miss Father Alden. He was a fine pastor.
dedalus_1947: (Default)
Rapeseed (Brassica napus), also known as rape,
oilseed rape, rapa, rapeseed, and canola, is a bright
yellow flowering member of the family Brassicaceae,
the mustard or cabbage family.
(Wikipedia)
 
That’s how I started my original blog - with a clever definition of the “rape blossom” or rapeseed. It was meant to create an image in your mind of a yellow flower, in a panoramic field of solid yellow. I would also insert a photo of such a meadow, to give you a pictorial reference as well. Then I was going to quickly begin describing a presentation I made at school to the parents of fieldtrip group who were going to Washington D.C. You would read the dialogue of what I said about the trip, and my assurances of the safety of their children. All of this was meant to set up the real story I wanted to tell – a story about a rape; a rape that took place at my school over two months ago.

 

Things happen at schools, and they occur at three levels of perception and reality. There is the world of the students (and even that world is divided into grade levels and classes), the adult world of teachers and staff, and another adult world of parents and family. They are usually peaceful and harmonic worlds, with a natural gravitational pull centered on the education of children that allows these worlds to move far and near, with occasional intersections. However, an act of sexual violence or physical force has a way of stabbing straight through these planes of existence – wounding and smashing them together.
 
When I write personal narratives for this blog – I go where my mind leads, and write what occurs to me. It’s like a prose journey that I start at one place, never knowing where it will end; it’s a trip without a destination, until I arrive. For the first time in writing this blog, I realized that this story about a rape wouldn’t fit; the narrative journey would go too far. There were too many complex characters to introduce, too many plot twists to guide, and too many shocks and surprises to spring. They wouldn’t fit into one blog. My blogs are too long as it is! This one would have gone on, and on, and on. So I stopped.  I haven’t stopped the story, I can’t stop that story. That boat left the harbor and won’t stop until it reaches its destination. I’m compelled to write it; I’ve been haunted by that story for months. I just can’t write it here.
 
I’ve come to a demarcation line in my blog: do I write stories or personal essays? There is a big difference between a personal narrative about an event, and a story about an incident that deeply affected the lives and emotions of everyone involved. I started an essay about a rape at school that was leading me toward an extensive short story which needs to be fictionalized. There was no doubt in my mind; the piece was not a topic for a subjective personal essay. This story was simply too real, and thereby too complex and ambiguous to be told as FACT. This story had to be told in a manner that would preserve anonymity while pluming the depth of the people involved and their actions. It would be the only way to find some meaning in what occurred. So, my resolution was to write this essay about my epiphany on the differences between story and essay, and continue working on the story. Will I ever post it? I don’t know. I’ll have to see what it looks like when it’s done.

Profile

dedalus_1947: (Default)
dedalus_1947

March 2024

S M T W T F S
      12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 28th, 2026 05:22 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios